Sentences with phrase «so nothing seems»

This will mean that I want them used to me standing near while they eat, and I usually carry the bottle with me as well - so nothing seems odd at all during the routine.

Each product is specifically designed to deliver the most energy achievable, so nothing seems daunting and everything is possible.

Not exact matches

That's why it's so common to meet business leaders who seem to think of nothing else.

You know if you're English, Americans always seem so tall, nothing personal, and he's in the elevator and I thought he said are you a movie star?

There seems nothing to be done about banks impoverishing people by extortionate credit card rates, junk securities and a debt burden so heavy that it will require one bailout after another over the next few years.

More and more people see the flooding, read the stories about sea levels, and worry privately — but everyone else seems to be going along as if nothing was wrong, so they go along too.

So far, it seems nothing major will happen in the near future.

Well guys it is Hell already here on earth endless killings worldwide... Back here where I am Ye is already heading towards that the whole country is on demonstrations demanding resignation of the ruler but he seems unwilling to resign before the end of his ruling period on 2013, while the streets are demanding immediate resignation and that has caused bloodshed in every city in the country... the streets demonstrations has enforced civil strikes all over the country which is now paralyzed... no cash with the banks all money frozen in the central bank... My business is in the field of services therefore I find my self now obliged to dismiss part of my staff in order to be able to survive this unfortunate thing... Already have reduced working hour to one shift to reduce running cost... so you see am now sitting alone in the whole building of our business office writing here as nothing can be done to carry on business even if there is business... Just I pray these unfortunate events passes over soon before it becomes out of control as had happened in Libya... we have nothing to say but (Ina - Lilah - WaIna - Alih - Ragoon) & (Alhmed - Lilah for every thing)... «Mankind has always been Hasty while God has always been the most Patient»...

lol... you making up a load of BS that's not even part of our beliefs... when we prayer... we ask that God gives you wisdom and insight... you still have a choice in the matter... so really you got nothing on us... you wan na avoid prayer cause it seems you think it might be real and it might make you go to hell if you don't heed... sorry... that don't change abit

atheists are such angry people they rarely make positive contributions to discussions of any kind because they are so busy feeling mad that they have nothing to be hopeful or happy about (or it would seem that way since they are so spiteful and unaccepting of anyone else)..

There is nothing here stopping groups from being exclusive it seems that you just can not get the University to fund your organisation if it excludes other students from joining, and I have no problem with that what so ever.

Were it not for that fortuity, nothing in his own interpretive canons, so it seems, would have led him to conclude that deaf - mutes are also fashioned In His Image and should be educated, and afforded the opportunity of consciousness and expression, just like anyone else.

The central allegation of paradox seems to me to run roughly as follows: a nontemporal divine experience would include in itself all events in time (cf. CSPM 105); but to experience all temporal events simultaneously would dissolve any real distinction between past and future (cf. CSPM 66); so there could be no temporal transition, no change, no contingency, and no freedom (cf. CSPM 137); and since nothing could become, there could be no real permanent and unchanging reality either, «for then the contrast between the terms, and therewith their meaning, must vanish» (CSPM 166).

So many of these comments seem to make vague allusions to incidents that I know nothing about, and yet they are offered as examples in some larger narrative.

Furthermore, the idea that I am just an individual, owing little or nothing to anyone, that I need to be autonomous, seems absurd when we consider our own personal origins: we each owe our conception and birth to a mother and a father; our whole lives involve a series ofinterlocking relationships with parents, family, friends, teachers, society and so on.

What I said was people in this country were ready to vote for someone of a different color not because of his credibility (after all, he had pretty much nothing for a record before running for office) which you seem to care so much about, but because of the color of his skin.

This difficulty lay like a great sorrow upon all theologians whose last norm of belief was nothing more certain than private interpretation of the Bible, and while it broke the faith of some, it serves also, paradox though it may seem, to explain how it was that so many non-Catholic exegetes found it easy to strip themselves of theological vesture and to plunge wildly with the higher critics into the maelstrom of that speculative free - for - all and devaluation of Christian dogma which followed.

Yet in another sense, Jesus» ethic is so free of substantive religious demands that it seems to disappear, to poof into nothing.

I remember waiting for something to feel different, but nothing seemed to change, and so I decided that Jesus must have been successful in keeping Satan out of my heart.

Even though Whitehead seems to have developed his Categories in response to issues in the philosophy of nature, still nothing in reality can be an exception to the Categories, especially the Category of Categories, so how does the Category of the Ultimate intersect with Whitehead's theism?

There was only one language at the time, and it seems their communication was so good, there was nothing they could not accomplish.

Our best moral theories might seem to entail that nothing could justify God's having created a world with so much evil in it.

So it seems that the previous universe was the decider and nothing was left open or indeterminate requiring further determination.

Paganism seems so easy to me because it requires nothing from you.

When the problems are added up, they do indeed appear so overwhelming that nothing but «basic social change» seems to be the answer.

By 2001 I had already become quite tuned - out from rock, and so maybe my sense of it is off, but from my removed listening post, it seemed to me that 9/11 afflicted rock with an excruciatingly awkward case of nothing to say.

Some of the writers in Homosexuality seem to believe that persuasion and «openness» can transform church and society, while others indicate that homophobia is so entrenched in the present order that nothing short of revolutionary apocalypse will do.

Atheists seemed to have a better grip on the bible than I did so I had nothing to offer on that count.

You have done nothing but insult me, so it seems kind of hypocritical that you keep posting the same things over and over, while making personal insults.

When Paul wrote to the Thessalonians in A.D. so he clearly expected it very soon indeed, and the qualifications he introduces in 2 Thessalonians seem to have been of the nature of an afterthought of which he had said nothing in his preaching.

Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have said no to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have to be in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because of that i just said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz

There is of course no special affinity between crankiness as such and superior intellect, (Superior intellect, as Professor Bain has admirably shown, seems to consist in nothing so much as in a large development of the faculty of association by similarity.)

Although this example has a modern ring to it, there is nothing really new about the problem it presents, which is: How is it that freedom and purpose that determine so much about us arise in a world that seems to run entirely on mechanical laws?

Even so, it seems to me nothing but simple justice to grant the one his prophet's mantle and his tragic wisdom, but still to grant the other the supremacy of his art.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

No wonder religious people seem so insecure when even the slightest rebuttal of their beliefs is brought up... they are taught they are nothing without «god», so to them if they were to stop believing they honestly buy into that line of garbage and believe they will actually be nothing.

Nothing seemed to «fit» that event, so we had to repair to Amos and be reminded that justice must roll down like waters, and righteousness must flow like a mighty stream.

All of this randomness of the universe, you know the one with the rules that seem to complement each other so well... almost like it was designed... but wasn't because you know it was randomly created... by nothing...

It seems to exhaust the theoretical options to say that such an answer must be achieved by reference to either: 1) the categories themselves; 2) the noncategorial aspects of events; 3) both categorial and non categorial aspects of events; 4) some alleged factor (e.g., a God, Platonic Forms, «nothing») other than the categorial aspects of events; or 5) by nothing (i.e., by no alleged factor at all, including «nothing»), so that the ultimate issue is meaningless or at least unanswerable in principle.

One of the challenges of this view is that if Mark truly ended his narrative here, he seems to have concluded by deliberately not concluding, by dangling something incomplete and unsatisfying before the reader in the final verse: «So they went out and fled from the tomb, for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.»

He was very old when I first came to know him, and his body so attenuated that it seemed formed of nothing so much as of so many roots of trees.

But as it seems every thing that has happened in this era was - is still stupid and am fed up with but have nothing in hand to change destiny that seems not going good at all and many inoccents will pay the price of faults that they have not made or agreed for... Honestly watching the news that is becoming to be of our area I feel tonight so much depressed and no sight of any glimpse of light to peace on earth for all in general.

Oh, costly bargain, where remorse must pay so dearly for what seemed in the eyes of lightheartedness and busyness and proud struggling and impatient passion and the judgment of the world to be reckoned as nothing!

Though, there is nothing wrong in seeking texts» wider pertinency, the liberal way of doing it increasingly came to seem so incoherent that any attempt to resuscitate it would require careful argument.

The first time there is some hint of this is a reference to a mood in the period after his finals, a time of anti-climax when, having attained ones goal, there seems to be nothing so well defined left.

Likewise, Voegelin applies the concept so broadly that it seems to take in almost everything — and thus tell us next to nothing at all.

The so - called «balanced approach» (a new code word that means the exact opposite from what it would seem) sought by the president is most likely going to be all about restricting guns and nothing but study on reigning in Hollywood for the culture of violence.

The true testing ground for the implicate - order strategy, it seems to me, may indeed be biology rather than physics, where abstract methods are so powerful as to perhaps make it dispensable: just as the old style building - block materialist was refuted not by philosophical polemic, but by the one authority in which he trusted, i.e., by physics itself, so the nothing - but reductionist in contemporary biology will modify his views should it be possible some day to provide him with a mathematical language that fills the currently existing gap between our formal knowledge of gene structure and combinations, and our intuitive apprehension of growth and shape.

It means nothing; and it seems, so far as I can observe, useless to others.

Over the last year or so I've realised that nothing is as bad as it seems either and even the worst issues got resolved in the end.