Sentences with phrase «so obvious the answer»

Jesus is the Son of God, so the obvious answer would be Jesus.

So the obvious answer to «why a 24 hour fast?»

Young children become close to pets very quickly, so the obvious answer to the problem - getting rid of it - is not always an alternative.

Last summer I spoke to Simon Fodden to see what he thought about my doing a blog on the Law Commission of Ontario website (oh, how so obvious the answer must have seemed!).

Not exact matches

So even when the answer is not immediately obvious, get into the routine of asking yourself regularly, What's going right and why am I grateful for that?

But, like Paiji says, most people don't walk around with their laptops — so mobile is the obvious answer.

So, the obvious answer is to separate those and a simple way of doing it is for governments to simply stop using the term «marriage».

Generally speaking, the answers are obvious, so to anyone with a modicum of discernment and common sense, the questions are rhetorical.

The main reason I abandoned Christianity to become an atheist is that I just couldn't keep rationalizing all the time when the one obvious answer, «there is no god» so effectively addressed all these questions.

Are you really so naive that you think you have the answer and the rest of the world is just too dumb to see what's so obvious to you?

From my perspective, the answer is so incredibly obvious.»

I have only read a few of your posts so forgive me if the answer is obvious, but I would sincerely appreciate and would like to consider your answer.

It comes as quite a surprise as it seems to be why are so many people leaving organized religions when the obvious answer is that organized religions aren't speaking to people and are becoming polarized and intermixed with politics.

So many times the questions are so leading that the answers will be obviouSo many times the questions are so leading that the answers will be obviouso leading that the answers will be obvious.

So yes, atheist should have to answer obvious questions.

Isn't the answer so obvious who did it??

I know that many people think that this is what God IS doing through answer to prayer, and daily blessings, and so on, but in our more honest moments, I think all of us wish that God would make His existence more obvious.

In any case, the question (which is so obvious as to not really need answering) is, why was SHE the only one of the pair brought before Jesus.

Besides, It actually takes very little effort to answer some of the posts here, the answers are so obvious.

A few of the obvious drives that pack us off, daily or weekly or episodically or, for some, in hope, permanently, are fear or even terror in the particular given set of circumstances; the sheer discouragement and exhaustion of facing questions without answer; profound disillusionment — it takes many forms — with the pertinent, prevailing system or systems; deep and bitter contempt for one's own society, bred of the abysmal failure to attain in consistent practice even a semblance of the justice professed and acclaimed; despair — so it was with the college generation of the late sixties — over the formidable obduracy of a political establishment in going its merciless way quite apparently deaf to the cries of anguish of its empathetic and real victims, victims by the tens of millions here and around the world.

Nevertheless, for all his artful linguistic deconstruction, Amar has no effective answer for the most obvious question of all: If in fact the framers of the Amendment intended to apply the Bill of Rights against the states, why didn't any of them say so?

Yes you're right, but everyone is so upset because Graham said the obvious when he was made to answer a question.

Finally, the answer was obvious: puree the riced and dried cauliflower along with some eggs, some really flavorful powdered vegetable bouillon that has a nutritional yeast base (I got that idea from my recipe for low carb cauliflower tortillas), and some tapioca starch to serve as both a binder and add some flexibility so the pizza bends -LRB-!).

The answers to the questions seemed so obvious but then again you never know how a 4 year old thinks.

The obvious answer is just to prepare more food so you have enough for a packed lunch the next day.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

i remember after the first Diaz fight, he was also talking about various things to answer a single question, as if he wanted to divert attention away from the obvious so he doesn't have to face them head - on.

So why do people keep defending a man who is obviously holding the club back by continuing to get it so wrong when the answer is obviouSo why do people keep defending a man who is obviously holding the club back by continuing to get it so wrong when the answer is obviouso wrong when the answer is obvious.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

In answer to the last comment It seems obvious that Sanchez wants out so why bother forking out that kind of money for him and Ozil does not deserve that kind of money (does anyone?)

are you trying to sell nic to us or convince yourself andy becos, even tho i like him myself, hes not a goalscorer and is forced wide away from goal all to easy.not our answer cant even begin to tell you how wrong you are when you said we wer gettin by quite nicely without a recognised goalscorer, as iv always said you cant expect our little midfielders and little beast verm to continue in the great vain thev shown this season, big teams will negate them, you need another outlet, an ian wright or defoe that goes in behind and turns a back 4, its painfully obvious and riles me when fellow fans ignore or dismiss it and tell me to keep the faith with players who hav had so much time to show their capabilities and not delivered, so how their now gonna excel just becos thev been absent a while is beyond me but that old proverb must be true.....»

For a younger sect, the answer is not so obvious.)

Take a little advice from seasoned safety professionals Denise Fields, author of Baby 411: Clear Answers and Smart Advice for Your Baby's First Year, and Alison Jacobson, The Safety Mom, and make sure you don't miss these 10 not - so - obvious tips to help keep your baby safe and sound.

The answer to this question so blatantly obvious that one has to wonder why the question was asked.

@DVK If there is evidence that it's a very small fraction engaged, that'd answer the question, but I discuss why this possibility alone doesn't seem to answer the question in the 1st paragraph after the bullet list (tldr; ISIS are split between as many if not more fronts too, so there's no obvious reason why the % of Iraqi / Peshmerga troops engaged with ISIS would be lower than the % of ISIS fraction engaged with Peshmerga)

He would constantly quiz me on certain topics, and it would be obvious if I knew the answer or not, so he'd say, «It's OK to ask questions.

And investigators typically thought the answer was obvious — we eat too much — and so the experiments were not worth the effort.

When I ask if you know Alex Ritchie, the answer is immediately obvious to you, and there is no good theory to explain how memory retrieval can happen so quickly.

The not so obvious formal answer: Raising one's calories by such an amount can reverse certain physiological (and psychological) occurrences, resulting from a prolonged calorie deficit, that can slow down, stall, or even reverse your hard - earned fat / weight loss.

The much more obvious informal answer: Dieting can suck, and sometimes it's a good idea to make something less sucky so that you don't go insane.

So, the obvious answer is to eliminate or severely reduce the stressor.

The answer, however, is not so obvious.

So I had to figure out what to do, and when I discovered intuitive eating, it seemed like the obvious answer.

So there really isn't an overwhelmingly obvious answer to the questions regarding the benefits of compression clothing for performance and recovery.

So if you will be ever wondering what to get me for my birthday, I think the answer is pretty obvious.

The most obvious answer is obviously that they dated your best friend, but there are so many more.

So what causes teeth marking and well the answer to this is just about everything we come in to contact with will stain the teeth and this ranges from the obvious perpetrators like coffee, tea and nicotine to stuff like cherries but the thing isnot to get too stressed about as there's a good solution.

But of course, the answer is obvious, so the audience will get that funny - warm assurance from the outset that there's trouble ahead, but don't worry, everything's gonna be OK.

It's not like Hiltzik is generous with the anecdotes, or even a cooperative interview subject — he has a habit of declining to answer questions, as if his real motivations are either so obvious that the line of inquiry is insulting, or so obscure that providing straight answers would undermine the movie's endless complexity.