Sentences with phrase «so people on both sides»

You can extend the arm to the center of the car so people on both sides of the backseat can see.

Not exact matches

«I think Hillary is smart, but she's just upset so many people on the other side, that it's going to be very, very difficult,» he said.

So you have your earliest adopters who are very hard core on the engineering side, and now we're starting to see people who have experience at later - stage startups who understand the UX and business portion of it.

So I would have spent a little more time on the people side, a little more time on the relationship side, early in my career.

«Soon we realized it was accelerating beyond anything we were doing on the marketing or merchandising side, so it was pretty clear that people sharing their own content was driving the awareness of GoPro.»

People would talk about the founders of the organization, how they were stuck on the side of Mt. Baker in a storm and there was nowhere to buy their gear, so they came up with the idea of opening MEC.

The other side of the coin is a report released by the Pew Research Center, which found that as of February, only 15 % of people online use Twitter, while only 8 % do so on a typical day.

«I know in some cases [it] was lowered a level in an effort to streamline the process so it was more effective to the fighters on the ground,» he added, «but there was no change from a coalition perspective in the process — only who was the person saying «yes» to the strike on the Iraqi side.»

«There probably needs to be some education so we don't see people sitting on the side of their vehicle.»

And if you're someone who clearly identifies with being on either side of the fence, you know how challenging it can be living and working with people who can be so different from yourself.

«I think Hillary is smart, but she's just upset so many people on the other side, that it's going to be very, very difficult.»

I felt that was a shame, and so we wanted to provide something for people on the East Side.

Wichmann said Optum has «data around 200 million people on the administrative side, and then another 100 million or so in terms of medical records.»

Vaynerchuk says, «The only people you're going to trick are losing players, so you're not going to want them on their side anyway.»

«Building the peer - to - peer component is all about understanding different ways to market to people so you can feed the marketplace on both sides,» he says.

People that rely on work for this tend to be unsuccessful in remote positions, so we focus on finding people that gain their social side of life from other avPeople that rely on work for this tend to be unsuccessful in remote positions, so we focus on finding people that gain their social side of life from other avpeople that gain their social side of life from other avenues.

My pair skewed a bit on the skinny side, so people can make of that what they will.

On the negative side, people do seem to spend more when their houses are worth more, so low housing prices keep consumption down and that probably hurts the macro-economy.

People (on both sides) are so busy screaming at each other that rational conversation and discussion about this very difficult scenario keeps getting pushed to the side.

On the SD IRA custodian side, I've noticed a couple of them have setup specific «plans» for people investing in crowdfunding sites — these «plans» have significantly lower fees for crowdfunding deals compared to other SD IRA investments, so you end up paying significantly less to put $ 50K in a crowdfunding platform vs. $ 50K in a direct real estate deal or $ 50K in gold, for example.

So, generally, the biggest deltas are, one, a little bit weaker on the handset side; two, a little more conservative modeling of what happens later in the year than what we had, which frankly is not, again, just to drive that point home, nobody knows how many people are going to buy a new handset when it's launched on the market — not us, not our customers, not analysts, or you name it.

That was always a frustrating thing for me when I was an agent because people said «Oh, you sell on the East Side, so I'm going to go with a West Side broker.»

I just was sort of interested and talked to a lot of people about what was going on, but I wasn't really interested in looking at the business side of it, so I never was doing that.

People can also cancel 5 days in advance for a full refund on Airbnb so you should consider it side income, don't count on it to pay your mortgage or your holidays.

«The most important and fulfilling thing in my day to day life is taking care of my five children, who are ages 3 - 13 but on the business side, it's knowing CSSCS has so quickly made a difference in people's lives that makes the sacrifices I have made all worthwhile.

On the influencer side, the insights that you get with linking and tagging brands in Stories shows you how many people clicked on the link so you have a better idea of how much of an impact you're generating for brands and if I'm linking to a blog post (another way I drive traffic to my blog) then I can see how many people clicked on the link from my storieOn the influencer side, the insights that you get with linking and tagging brands in Stories shows you how many people clicked on the link so you have a better idea of how much of an impact you're generating for brands and if I'm linking to a blog post (another way I drive traffic to my blog) then I can see how many people clicked on the link from my storieon the link so you have a better idea of how much of an impact you're generating for brands and if I'm linking to a blog post (another way I drive traffic to my blog) then I can see how many people clicked on the link from my storieon the link from my stories.

So I guess on the up - side, I don't often piss people off.

I'm sorry if you are so incompetent to take what he says seriously and people base their votes on his input, that is their problem, there are really stupid people on both sides of the isle.

People who are true Agnostics would sit squarely in the middle, so their belief claim shouldn't tilt either way (but it typically errs on the side of a god).

So the thing is, when you see someone say they don't want the bible, christianity or any theology pushed down their throats, it's not only because of the constant annoyance of dealing with people walking up to my door, people on the side of the street, coworkers, etc..

And even if they are mature as a person, they still may have the fundamentalist mindset - where they are on God's side, so if you're criticizing them, you are on the OTHER side.

As a recovering christian, 5 years clean and open minded, the truth definitely did set me free - it set me free of the horrors and fear that come with christianity; it allowed me to look at things from all sides (putting the shoe on the other foot so to speak); it allowed me to love more freely and be a better person.

GW can be a christian yes but there are some people who are catholics and christians and jehovas and atheist and so on that don't understand their wrong doing, saying God is on my side to go ahead and kill millions of innocent woman and children based on lies while the truth is for oil, that's not a real christian in my book, There's plenty of serial killers out there that says they've heard God telling them to kill.

One concern often heard is that if the name «Saint Gilbert» had appeared on his books, Chesterton never would have attracted as many readers — or as many converts — as he has: It is precisely his approachability as an ordinary person, they say, which has won so many people over to his side; making a him a saint could risk that.

Its just plan stupid and a waste of time, if you believe in god or buddah or allah or anyother good thats great for you and if you do not believe in a god thats great too, Whats one big problem that i cant understand is why people are so narrow minded on both sides of the specturm and even within different religions.

Looking on the bright side, there is one positive aspect to the reality that so many people fall prey to religious myths: it is helpful to remember that so many people are irrational.

It's their way or the highway and to compromise is to show a lack of faith which means you have one side willing to make exceptions for all peoples religions as long as they don't force it on others, and the religious side that says making exceptions or compromising is against their religion so if they are not a majority in the democracy they instead decide to play obstructionist.

Meanwhile the opposing side is made of largely a lot of seemingly logical «smart» often well educated people who are ironically no where nearly as «smart» as people out there generally think or realize so it literally becomes a debate of ignorant verses stupid on both sides which I do as a footnote occasionally find mildly entertaining.

«Is there anyone so foolish as to believe that there are people living on the other side of the earth with their heels upward and their heads hanging down?»

On the other side, we have been reminded that the orthodox eschatological teaching is the resurrection of the body, so that we should understand psyche and soma as two aspects of one human person.

I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)

If anyone was on the side of Satan, it would be all the religious people who follow lies without real reason to do so but their sheer gullibility and cluelessness.

You all have mocked Christians and some have swore at people on here with Christian beliefs so what am I to think that atheists are compassionate, logic isn't on your side on this one.

So it is that «growing numbers of people are abandoning religion in practice; on every side they influence literature, the arts, the interpretation of the humanities and of history and civil laws themselves.

But I would also encourage people on the other side who haven't read the Bible to do so.

People tell me that the system needs people like me, people on the other side of this ministry shift, people who are on the other side of the gender debates and the postmodern movement and People tell me that the system needs people like me, people on the other side of this ministry shift, people who are on the other side of the gender debates and the postmodern movement and people like me, people on the other side of this ministry shift, people who are on the other side of the gender debates and the postmodern movement and people on the other side of this ministry shift, people who are on the other side of the gender debates and the postmodern movement and people who are on the other side of the gender debates and the postmodern movement and so on.

So when we debate an «issue» and forget that it is backed by people — imperfect, wounded, beloved people on both sides — we dehumanize each other.

But on the side accessible to introspection, their causal condition is nothing but the degree of spiritual excitement, getting at last so high and strong as to be sovereign; and it must be frankly confessed that we do not know just why or how such sovereignty comes about in one person and not in another.

Instead, people simply wanted to go to war, to annihilate their enemies, to set themselves up as ruler, or raise taxes, and so they claimed that God had given them a message, that God was on their side, and that God would fight for them in their «Holy War.»

So many people stand on the side and complain.