Sentences with phrase «so simple i think»

This looks so simple I think I could even do it.

So simple I thought that can't be right.

I'm in love with your cute little bag - it's so simple I think I will have my littles do them for their Easter baskets!

And so simple I think I might be able to do it myself!

Not exact matches

Forget so - called «brain training» programs, which science has recently largely discredited, and instead think about taking up a simple meditation practice.

So Carolyn and I thought we would stimulate your brain with eight simple ideas on how to delight your customers right away.

It seems so simple, you could have thought of it yourself, right?

But because there are so many Canadian Tire stores right across the country — I think 90 % of the population lives within 15 minutes of a Canadian Tire — it's much simpler just to order online and pick up at the store.

Even if the mistake was simple — like not thinking through an idea — you can improve your thought process so it doesn't happen next time.

«Often times you may think an idea is so simple that the «big guys» should be doing it.

Reacher agrees to help Chang in her case, thinking it should be pretty simple, but when it ends up dragging him all over the country and face - to - face with some villainous characters, Reacher thinks maybe it's not so cut - and - dry after all.

Making ice cream commercially was not so simple as multiplying his kitchen recipe by 50, as he'd thought.

That's why their epiphanies and visions often sound so simple, in a «Why didn't I think of that?»

You may not think something so simple as a job listing merits much attention, but missing some key details could cause you to miss out on some serious talent.

Now as a full - time entrepreneur, I've mastered the simple diet changes that keep my critical thinking skills sharp, so that I can perform my best, no matter what challenges come my way!

«It ensures you think things through, and find strong simple explanations so that others can learn from you.»

Much of what we think of as simple good fortune can be explained if we look hard, so forget about a lucky horseshoe and study what «luckier» people do.

«My dear, I think we can make this so much simpler if we agree not to lie to each other.

Often we spend so much time thinking about our business, that we overlook the simple, almost painfully obvious things that can help our business grow.

Trump responds to question «Why don't I just fire Mueller» «Many people have said you should fire him... we'll see what happens, I think this is disgraceful and so do a lot of other people, this is a pure and simple witch hunt» pic.twitter.com/llJrXhig4 2

And to think, so many people pay a financial advisor thousands of dollars each year to do something as simple as this.

The principle is so simple and yet so many people think only about customers and not competitors as well.

Rather simple, when you ponder it a while» Frank Martin «I think volatility is so widely used as a risk - metric simply because it is easy to measure, not because it is a good gauge of risk of permanent loss of capital.

Demanding that people think a certain way in order to belong is so clean, so black - and - white simple.

The fact that you think the question of how the world was created is so simple, shows how simple you are.

So personally, I think they got exactly what they deserved for opening their mouths and complaining over 4 busses having a simple basic add that is not offensive at all except to those who believe they have the right to DICTATE (derived from Dictator) to others what they can and can not do and who SCREAM bloody murder if they are subject to the same rules they themselves wish to espouse.

The population that summer was 307,006,550... so in simple terms that would mean that the 24 % equates out to be approximately 73, 681, 572... I think there are more than enough... the difference between an Atheist baseball team and a christian ball team is that we'd walk away, have a beer and pat each other on the back for a job well done, a christian ball team would give credit to their god.

The claim was a simple thing to do in ancient times because scientifically ignorant people still did not know why the sun rose and set and why the seasons changed and why lightning and why thunder and why earthquakes and why disease and why just about anything... so people all thought that a god or gods controlled it all.

are people so simple they crave the misguided beliefs of others to feel better about themselves or are we triing to understand the lunacy of our citizens to believe something as pathic as a 3000 year old IDEA in order to act properly when voting in those who will run this country for the next 4 years a.k.a. voting in one who using rational thinking and logic to make choices!

So I don't know y u think Pascal's Wager is so simplSo I don't know y u think Pascal's Wager is so simplso simple.

When I am told not to think so much because the «plain and simple reading» of Scripture demands certain conclusions, the cognitive dissonance is excruciating.

It's simple: You don't get to say what marriage is or is not based upon the bible or the so - called word of god (whatever that is... think about that for a minute... unless you speak 1st century aramaic you have no idea what the original writers of the ficto - mythic texts you now presume as the word of god even means!)

If God already considers us all thus, which I think He / she does, then that pure thought... God loves me, God loves them... so I must as well... To me its that simple.

The point about all these pontifications, I thought at the time, whether over the airwaves or in the print media, either by secular commentators or by the kind of Catholics the liberal media like to give a platform to because their views on the Catholic tradition are so similar to their own (it seemed by the beginning of the conclave that it had all been going on for ever) was — or so I reflected then in my simple way — that this wonderful free - for - all was the only chance for many of them to be heard at all on this subject.

But we persist in the struggle because we think it is our simple duty to do so, and we frankly do not take it well that so many of our fellow intellectuals — who if they can not join us in the struggle could at least offer moral support — prefer instead to strike ostentatiously Olympian poses above the fray and to chide us for our combative ways.

Christianity is a rather simple thought virus (meme) by today's standards, the USA government uses much more complex thought viruses today, so do large corporations for marketing purposes (simply because on 75 % of the people they WORK).

It's too bad that laws and courts must become involved with what used to be the simplest of lessons: Not everyone thinks the same way, but everyone is entitled to their opinions; if that kid won't play with you — or that baker will not make your cake — someone else will, so just kiss them up to God, and move on.

A very simple exercise in logic for all of you who are so intent on the need for a «creator» to exist to satiate your wonder is: if you think there needs to be a «creator» for existence, then who created your «creator»?

I just don't think that heterosexual people have the right to ask LGBT people to change, as if it was so simple.

For purposes of illustration, let us have a simple example: A and B are actual entities, and B prehends A. And so there is the nexus — call it the A-B nexus — that is constituted by B's prehension of A. 6 The phrase «prehensions of each other» in the category suggests that, in order to have a nexus, A must also prehend B. However, I think that Whitehead used that phrase loosely, and so its meaning can also be expressed as «prehensions of one another.»

In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).

I would think that evolutionists in this day and age would now be able to «create» the most simple life form, since it's so easy that just a matter of time, in a totally sterile environment, could see life come forth.

Why is it that an otherwise intelligent man like Billy Graham can be so simple minded as to think that there is any real condemnation in the bible of those of us that are born gay or transgender?

They want «ordinary» folks — not overeducated eggheads who think so abstractly that they don't recognize a plain simple fact on the one hand, or don't respond to emotional appeals on the other.

When all allowance has been made for these limiting factors — the chances of oral transmission, the effect of translation, the interest of teachers in making the sayings «contemporary,» and simple human fallibility — it remains that the first three gospels offer a body of sayings on the whole so consistent, so coherent, and withal so distinctive in manner, style content, that no reasonable critic should doubt, whatever reservations he may have about individual sayings, that we find reflected here the thought of a single, unique teacher.

The simpler parts are thought of as self - contained, so that internal relationships need not be considered.

Another school of thought, while conceding that war is one of the most vivid revelations of sin in human history, does not find the disavowal of war so simple a matter.

I want to say that I think this is a very valid question — but the answer to the issue is not so simple as you might think.

I think there is truth here in that the poor, the black, and the oppressed generally are occupied — and rightly so — with a most urgent social struggle for simple justice.

As for myself, I think it will prove to contain some elements which morality pure and simple does not contain, and these elements I shall soon seek to point out; so I will myself continue to apply the word «religion'to it; and in the last lecture of all, I will bring in the theologies and the ecclesiasticisms, and say something of its relation to them.