Sentences with phrase «so simple averages»

Data flows also differ greatly for 2G, 3G, and 4G devices, so simple averages of «typical cell phones» will mislead you, especially if you apply monthly data flows for 4G phones to the electricity intensity of 2G / 3G phones (as the Breakthrough Institute post and an associated email to the Time Magazine reporter appear to do).

Not exact matches

Trade is so simple that even Donald Trump could understand it, as could the average Joe in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, not to mention Mrs Joe.

These are so simple to make, and can really transform the average pancake into a fancy dessert!

I like these coconut flour pancakes because it's so easy to put something as simple as a banana into a pancake to spruce up the average flapjack.

Perhaps the greatest Italian comfort food, however, is the simplest tomato pasta, a recipe that is so deeply rooted in our childhood memories that the average Italian can differentiate the smell of her own family's tomato sauce recipe from any other.

Walcott as average as people say he is can get us about a total of 16 goals in all competitions this season when in form.Coquelin looked really good in preseason and looks to have gotten his interception ability back.Elneny has the ability to position himself in such a way that there's always someone next to him so he can make a simple pass while possessing aggresiveness and being able to intercept.This is for now is a good lineup.It's unfair to keep playing those who have failed while others wait.We need to get players back to form quickly.We must also bring back Wilshere who is bettrr than Ramsey and Xhaka and gets to form quickly.

Our favourite and go to recipe for making any salt dough ornaments is our quick and easy microwavable salt dough recipe — it's so simple to make and takes around 3 minutes for an average sized ornament.

When it comes to our public services, Gove's tactics are simple, yet done so skilfully that your average citizen is unaware that they are being bombarded with very sophisticated propaganda.

In the old days, ridding the average spacecraft of bugs was a simple matter: Place it in an oven, heat it up to a jillion degrees or so, and bake it for a couple of days.

Although these models vary in complexity, the simplest one is the so - called «poll of polls» approach, which simply averages the outcomes of all the polls under the assumption their respective biases will at least partially wash out.

«For the average person with healthy, untreated hair, there is no evidence that the simple act of shampooing, so long as it is with the appropriate ingredients for your hair, will cause damage.»

These are so simple to make, and can really transform the average pancake into a fancy dessert!

So over time, on average we eat fewer calories when we cut out simple and most complex carbs.

So has said a teacher of mine, and I doubt we'd find any medical expert or average Joe who would argue this simple logic.

A more simple way to average out this equation is to simply divide your weight in pounds by 2, so an adult weighing 150 pounds would therefore require 75grams of protein; a happy medium.

Adhering to these traditional concepts the US Department of Agriculture has concluded that diets, which reduce calories, will result in effective weight loss independent of the macronutrient composition, which is considered less important, even irrelevant.14 In contrast with these views, the majority of ad - libitum studies demonstrate that subjects who follow a low - carbohydrate diet lose more weight during the first 3 — 6 months compared with those who follow balanced diets.15, 16, 17 One hypothesis is that the use of energy from proteins in VLCKD is an «expensive» process for the body and so can lead to a «waste of calories», and therefore increased weight loss compared with other «less - expensive» diets.13, 18, 19 The average human body requires 60 — 65 g of glucose per day, and during the first phase of a diet very low in carbohydrates this is partially (16 %) obtained from glycerol, with the major part derived via gluconeogenesis from proteins of either dietary or tissue origin.12 The energy cost of gluconeogenesis has been confirmed in several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosis.

The dress features ranging from simple to casual, casual to formal and semi formal, so you can opt any desired style of the version and surroundings.The beautiful thing about this brand is that, the prices are very reasonable and mostly discounted, it is easy & affordable for rich to average people.

Average guy next door Intellectual 36 year old coloured male dark completion average height fit toned built Simple Mature down to earth guy I do have a vrou so looking for friendship with discreet fun I must be able to have an intellectual conversation with someone looking for like miAverage guy next door Intellectual 36 year old coloured male dark completion average height fit toned built Simple Mature down to earth guy I do have a vrou so looking for friendship with discreet fun I must be able to have an intellectual conversation with someone looking for like miaverage height fit toned built Simple Mature down to earth guy I do have a vrou so looking for friendship with discreet fun I must be able to have an intellectual conversation with someone looking for like minded...

«The Big Short» Criticwire Average: A - Dana Stevens, Slate The screenplay, co-written by McKay and Charles Randolph, dismantles prettified clichés about «moral hazard» and «complex financial instruments» to reveal the simpler, uglier words bundled into them like so many bad mortgages: Fraud.

But another historical example of averaging suggests that things are not so simple.

The simple average keeps the price line smooth, so it does not take into account any volatile recent price movements.

with a «how to» on calculating simple moving averages is because it's important to understand so that you know how to edit and tweak the indicator.

The investing rules that Buffett has always lived by seem so simple and common sense that one wonders why he's been so much more successful than the average money manager.

We've just got to de-mystify investing for the average investor so he or she sees smart investing is actually very simple.»

So you can see how just looking at a simple average is misleading.

So a simple and easy way to determine average / effective Federal tax rates needed to be invented (for input into retirement planning software).

So average i am getting 13.5 % return so far, if I pay all all premiums my cost would be 3 Lacs and I will get 3,40,500 +16,000 (3,56,500) around 18 % simple intereSo average i am getting 13.5 % return so far, if I pay all all premiums my cost would be 3 Lacs and I will get 3,40,500 +16,000 (3,56,500) around 18 % simple intereso far, if I pay all all premiums my cost would be 3 Lacs and I will get 3,40,500 +16,000 (3,56,500) around 18 % simple interest

So the Model Portfolios were created using an average of thousands of outcomes, to have something similar that's static, easy, quick, and simple to use.

Plus, they keep it simple so the average pet owner can understand and remember important information.

While the game may appear simple in concept, there's actually an incredible amount of depth, much more so than in your average puzzle title.

The Charge: Tower line is a simple yet highly effective way of solving many of the problems so common to the average gaming setup, at a highly cost effective price.

The result is a much simpler control scheme that made it so I was able to link a few attacks together to get an average of 10 - 15 hits per successful chain against the enemy (p.s. that's GOOD for me, as a non-fighting game person).

Recall the average American is barely functionally literate in science so simple is important.

But it is also true that transforming the latitude data of the individual radiosondes so that they are organised into surface - equivalent data groups is simple enough to be done with a simple excel sheet in less than 5 minutes, and once you have them correctly grouped and averaged, a linear plot will do the desired job perfectly well.

The best simple answer I've seen is basically that you have to go to a 2 - box model of Earth, with warm tropics and cold poles, and then realize that thanks to the thermohaline circulation the deep oceans are coupled almost exclusively to the polar regions, and so are in the «cold» box and not the warm one or some average of them.

Web it is so simple it is painful:) You have a latent engine with 240Wm - 2 minimum average energy required, that is 50 % efficient, 120Wm - 2 work, That is maintaining the lapse rate, 120Wm - 2 wasted, radiated to space.

Of course, these are global averages, the model is very simple, and so it isn't some perfect representation, but it is useful.

So it seems to me that the simple way of communicating a complex problem has led to several fallacies becoming fixed in the discussions of the real problem; (1) the Earth is a black body, (2) with no materials either surrounding the systems or in the systems, (3) in radiative energy transport equilibrium, (4) response is chaotic solely based on extremely rough appeal to temporal - based chaotic response, (5) but at the same time exhibits trends, (6) but at the same time averages of chaotic response are not chaotic, (7) the mathematical model is a boundary value problem yet it is solved in the time domain, (8) absolutely all that matters is the incoming radiative energy at the TOA and the outgoing radiative energy at the Earth's surface, (9) all the physical phenomena and processes that are occurring between the TOA and the surface along with all the materials within the subsystems can be ignored, (10) including all other activities of human kind save for our contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere, (11) neglecting to mention that if these were true there would be no problem yet we continue to expend time and money working on the problem.

Even going so far as to criticize a * different * post (putting noise back in to counter simple 5 - year averages)?

(Fully buffered, with heat capacity - > infinity, T ~ (average insolation) ** 1/4; unbuffered, for a simple model in which the sun switches full on for 12 hours then off for the other 12 hours, T ~ 0 at night and ~ (2 * average insolation) ** 1/4 during day, so Tav ~ (0 +2 ** 1/4) / 2 = 0.59, much lower than the buffered case).

So the ergodic theorem is saying that if you make an F average on a trajectory constructed by applying T again and again starting in some point X0 then this average is equal to the simple average of F over all points of X in the infinite limit of iterations.

The simple fact of the matter is that geologically, the climate is capable of average temperature variation at least the same order as not only that expected from the observed forcing but much greater than the (so far) observed forcing, on similar timescales.

If so, I think that the only thing the simple average shows is that it is useless for any purpose, unless it is actually being proposed that a real change of this size has taken place without anyone really noticing!

My guess is you don't know and your amateur attempts to build a structured system have become so hopelessly complex and interwoven (spaghetti) that at this point you can't unwind it to produce a simple answer to a simple question — where does raw monthly average data for Portland - Troutdale for the year 1950 come from and how is it processed such that it ends up 0.7 F cooler than the what the station keeper recorded in his monthy reports?

For the record, in the case of this «divergence», after dropping that post 1960 portion, the comparison between the reconstruction and the temperature record was done using decadal «smoothing» (basically weighted moving averages) of both series correlated on an annual basis for the 80 year period 1880 to 1960 so that the reported correlation was extremely exaggerated and not interpretable as a simple correlation might be.

So I would recommend — modestly — that skeptics try very hard not to buy into this and redirect all such discussions to questions such as why the models are in such terrible disagreement with each other, even when applied to identical toy problems that are far simpler than the actual Earth, and why we aren't using empirical evidence (as it accumulates) to reject failing models and concentrate on the ones that come closest to working, while also not using the models that are obviously not working in any sort of «average» claim for future warming.

These range from simple averaging of regional data and scaling of the resulting series so that its mean and standard deviation match those of the observed record over some period of overlap (Jones et al., 1998; Crowley and Lowery, 2000), to complex climate field reconstruction, where large - scale modes of spatial climate variability are linked to patterns of variability in the proxy network via a multivariate transfer function that explicitly provides estimates of the spatio - temporal changes in past temperatures, and from which large - scale average temperature changes are derived by averaging the climate estimates across the required region (Mann et al., 1998; Rutherford et al., 2003, 2005).

So average i am getting 13.5 % return so far, if I pay all all premiums my cost would be 3 Lacs and I will get 3,40,500 +16,000 (3,56,500) around 18 % simple intereSo average i am getting 13.5 % return so far, if I pay all all premiums my cost would be 3 Lacs and I will get 3,40,500 +16,000 (3,56,500) around 18 % simple intereso far, if I pay all all premiums my cost would be 3 Lacs and I will get 3,40,500 +16,000 (3,56,500) around 18 % simple interest

The insights are that the average recruiter has just spent a few moments looking and checking the resume, it is so simple that it makes an impression.