Sentences with phrase «so small errors»

Language and communication are very important within the sales industry, so small errors in your resume will undoubtedly catch the attention of hiring managers.

Not exact matches

Still, credit bureau reports do have some potential for error, so small businesses should not necessarily use them as the only source of consumer credit information.

«So, we feel like the error bars around the unit volume predictions are getting smaller with each passing week,» Musk said on a conference call on Wednesday.

So was it a shipping error that was going to require me to re-order, or a small delay caused by the shoes being temporarily out of stock?

This dangerous tendency is referred to as «trickle down,» where one takes a premature profit on a large - cap name and realizing the error, replaces it with a mid-cap that also gets turfed too early, being again replaced with a small - cap, and so on and so forth until you wake up one morning and realize that your entire net worth has wound up in the hands of 10 or 15 masterful Vancouver promoters.

Then when Barth himself changed his mind — as he so often and so publicly did, as if it were merely a matter of an excusable error after he had formerly fired so all - inclusive a barrage in support of his now - discarded view — it is small wonder that many people became exasperated and, though they might themselves be deeply influenced by him, preferred not to admit it.

For Heidegger the history of being is, in a sense, the story that being has told of itself down the centuries, over which philosophers have had only small control; and so they can not be given full credit even for their errors.

The margin for error will be even smaller next season, so we need to do all we can to be ready for the challenge and also stop others where it's possible alas city and Sanchez.

If your baby is very young or very small or has any health issues, I'd make an effort to get a room with a kitchenette or microwave so there would be no room for error.

A new ICM poll in tomorrow's Sunday Telegraph suggests that 39 % of Liberal Democrat voters would prefer to have Charles Kennedy back as their leader, while 47 % would still like a new leader (though bearing in mind that this is a normal sized sample, the sub-sample of Lib Dem voters is so small that the margin of error on the question will be huge.)

This is because clouds have more - complex microphysics than the open sky, so even small errors in the models can cascade into large uncertainties in the forecast.

«The error bars are now so small that we should be able to say «this and this agree,» so the results presented in 2016 introduced a big tension in cosmology.

«However, with a peptide, we're considering a smaller number of interactions and an error might throw our design off quite a bit, so our energy function has to be more precise.»

The density of luminous matter is so small that it falls within the rounding errors of dark matter and dark energy, which is why the numbers add up to more than 100 percent.

He and his coeditor found more than 100 small errors: misspellings, incorrect grammar, and so on.

«Reading small lung transplant biopsies with a microscope is challenging — much more so than other transplantable organs — and that makes diagnosing rejection that much more difficult and prone to error,» explained Kieran Halloran, assistant professor of medicine in the U of A's Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry.

While some research was previously done by his and other groups on a smaller scale, «This is the first real description of a method that could be used broadly across a range of conditions to operationally measure diagnostic errors and associated bad outcomes so that we can track our performance and see whether our interventions are making a difference,» Newman - Toker says.

Measurements of such precision, stretching over so many light - years, can be thrown off by the smallest errors, Cowie points out.

The moon is too small for its core to have grown hot enough to churn and create a magnetic field, so researchers have attributed the magnetism to everything from asteroid impacts to measurement errors.

Some caveats: First, it's a small study, so the margins of error are high.

Different types of rennet [yes, they're also produced in multiple ways, and carry traces of chemicals etc] can be aggravating, so choosing a rennet is really a matter of trial and error, but a friend who always got super sick when eating parmesan [standard for all pastas, creamed potatoes etc] has gone for organic parmesan and introducing it 1 - 2 grated bits at a time, and very slowly, is now up to a small chunk.

There will always be errors in calculations in matching insulin to food, so a smaller insulin load enables you to reduce the errors in insulin dosing.

Now speaking of sizing — The brilliant thing with jeans is they go up in small increments so you can be really precise in finding the perfect fit, simply by trial & error.

So don't be alarmed if you order your normal size and they're either way too big or too small - I think it takes a little trial and error with this denim style.

If it is broken down into groups that are too small (e.g., individual classes) the standard error of measurement tends to become so great that although the data remains «valid» it is no longer «reliable.»

But EVAAS scores are calculated to the second decimal place, so an error as small as one hundredth of a point could spell the difference between a positive or negative EVAAS effectiveness rating, with serious consequences for the affected teacher.

You're just going so fast, and the walls close in, and the margin for error is small.

And e-ink's refresh speed forces a small delay on every graphical change, so moving through pages is sluggish, clunky, and error - prone.

Authors are sometimes in so much of a rush to quick get the book printed that they overlook even the smallest of correctable errors.

It's so much more than just fixing the small errors.

It's so small, and nestled between the cursor and return, is an easy route to errors.

Many of the stocks are extremely small and illiquid, so any fund or ETF that tried to replicate the index would suffer from huge tracking error.

Reviewing your report properly could unearth many errors — big or small — and could have an effect on your overall credit score, which is why reviewing is so important.

Number two we don't want to drive tracking error, so we don't want small stocks to drive returns, so some things let's say 0.01 percent of the S&P 500, we don't want that driving our returns but we may really like that stock, we may think it's really cheap so we will buy more of it and we may even buy five or eight times more of it but that's only 0.05 or 0.08 percent, not really going to drive returns, we will buy as much as we can subject to the constraints that we don't want to drive too much tracking error.

Of course, with such a small footprint, Idzi does not have much margin for error, so she sticks with best - selling categories such as collars and leads, toys and gourmet treats — all of which reflect a nautical, coastal sensibility.

American Airlines will let you hold award tickets if you call and place them on hold for up to 5 days, so while there may be a small window for error, you can take advantage of this promotion and hold award tickets if you time it correctly.

It also means that small errors can now be saved, so getting on the power a touch too early doesn't always have to result in spinning around in circles and cursing loudly.

He does not, however, address the size and bias of the approximation errors with respect to a small change (1 % or less of mean temp in Kelvin) resulting on Earth from a small change in forcing (doubling of CO2 concentration), over a long but finite time (140 years or so for the concentration of CO2 to double from what it is now.)

I'll be happy for someone to clarify this but don't the models run through a succession of time cycles for a number of defined «columns» of the atmosphere — so isn't there a chance that a small initial error could accumulate.

But the bias uncertainty is smaller than the errors which are not persistent in time (e.g. due to incomplete spatial coverage), so I don't think accounting for this would make much difference, as Victor suggests.

The error is small enough to have confidence that the ocean heat content has been increasing in the past 15 years, during the so called «hiatus» in global warming.

If the conclusions of this paper were correct, this spread (being so much smaller than the estimated errors of + / - 15 deg C) would be nothing short of miraculous.»

That error is about an order magnitude smaller than the error in F3 (AGW) so does not change the fundamental point I am making.

Ken Parish responds to my post on satellites, making a small but important error in doing so.

This is due to the error in reasoning that because human flux is so much smaller than ocean flux we must surely make little difference compared to nature in the final trend.

An parcel of ideal gas moving up or down the air column might be approximately follow an adiabatic expansion curve because air is a relatively poor conductor of air so the error made assuming it is adiabatic is small if the transport time is much shorter than the time for conduction to make secular changes in temperature.

So your error — according to Velasco et al, as well as myself, DeWitt Payne and probably Robert Brown too — is in taking that marginal height dependence of average molecular kinetic energy for small N as a temperature lapse rate.

What NASA and JPL scientists like Loeb and Stephens are telling us is that the imbalance in the energy budget arises from subtraction of two relatively big fluxes, The difference in the net imbalance is so small compared to the error in measuring the fluxes, that we can not know for sure either the size or the sign of the net imbalance.

During my week stay on Midway, I learned so much about creating smart solutions for big problems through hands - on trial and error, learning to deal with the fact that some problems take a long, long time to solve, the care that everyone has for preserving the history of an area while returning it to its original health, and appreciating the incredible diversity of wildlife found on such a small piece of land.

Would I be moderated out if — on a fairly cursory skim of this discussion — I said that some people here are being a bit like the sceptics / denialists, so a small number of errors are being used to demolish all of the extended reporting of the Guardian?