This is just one of a dozen or
so smoking guns of fraud in the hoax called AGW.
Not exact matches
Various criminal investigations are still ongoing in Germany but none have
so far unearthed a
smoking gun that would incriminate top management.
The fact that this case took
so long to try and decide reflects the fact there was nothing like a proverbial «
smoking gun».
While none of the reports
so far is a
smoking gun, the very idea that Microsoft (MSFT) and Sony are thinking about upgrades rather than a major release is notable.
Thirty years ago, a riot at Peterhead Prison, Scotland, got
so out of hand that British special forces had to intervene with
smoke bombs and stun
guns.
«I've given you lots of discovery, and
so far you don't have any
smoking gun,» said Alsup, referring to whether Uber actually knew Levandowski had said trade secrets in hand.
«
So far, you don't have any
smoking guns.»
If by some fluke I do find myself heaven - bound on May 21 in a puff of
smoke while my ailing mother and father are left down here with no one to care for them as the Horsemen ride over the hill shootin'their 6 -
guns, I'm gonna demand a return flight
so I can stand guard in front of their house with my NFR - approved lariat, ready for some ropin».
He saw a wisp of
smoke coming from behind a tree,
so he aimed his
gun at the
smoke with one arm and fired.
There is nothing like a
smoking gun yet, but it seems inconceivable that Russia interfered
so heavily in the French and US elections but did not bother to do
so in the Brexit referendum.
Colizzi also asked to see the
so - called
smoking gun, the glass vial found at one of the nurses» homes.
«Nanojets and / or nanoflares in the middle corona would be a
smoking gun that would explain why the corona is
so organized,» DeForest says.
We won't even have the gases, just little squiggles in a spectrum,
so I don't know that there will be a definitive «
smoking gun.»
In a quiet region, such hot temperatures clearly weren't due to a large explosive solar flare, and
so are a
smoking gun that something otherwise unobservable was heating up this area.
The World Anti-Doping Agency funded research to develop a plasticizer test that would catch cheating cyclists, but
so far it's not the
smoking gun that many have hoped for.
«We've learned
so far there is no
smoking gun indicating space weather is the primary driver,» said Goddard space weather scientist Antti Pulkkinen.
One of those specific gene expansions is a «
smoking gun» that may help explain why octopuses are
so intelligent.
The «
smoking gun» would be if a black hole in a merger was smaller than 1.45 solar masses: Below this
so - called Chandrasekhar limit, no black holes can form after a stellar explosion — it would have to form in another process, making it more likely to be primordial.
Non-biological processes can produce calcium - carbonate too,
so its presence isn't necessarily a
smoking gun, even if it is confirmed.
The upshot is that the scientific evidence is weak in pointing a
smoking gun at silicones, but the questions and uncertainty are there,
so it's worth keeping a close eye on them — especially given the growing concerns about endocrine - disrupting chemicals that might produce health problems a generation after a minuscule exposure.
And
so, when I, it's not a
smoking gun.
So, when you talk about
smoking gun, you know, in the interest of course, that we don't have four hours for a podcast, what, are there other things on here that you think leap out, as far as things that influence high cortisol, or things that you specifically ordered on this custom panel that you really wan na highlight?
Big,
so, and again, when you're looking at this stuff, you wan na look at the
smoking gun.
In terms of the
smoking gun,
so if you look at, I'm on page three here, your testosterone at 496 is not bad, but it's, you know, depending on if you look at an optimal reference range for testosterone, it's maybe a little bit on the low side.
You're basing preferences on photos alone
so I quickly started saying «no» if any of the following were in (or prominent in) their photos:
guns, cars, trucks, excessive drinking,
smoking, tattoos, nudity, boobs (yep, in guys profiles, their «friends» boobs were quite common) or general douchebaggery.
Said mass, it turns out, is guarded by
gun - toting farmers fiercely protective of their cannabis crops;
so much for
smoking pot all day, one of Richard's loftier ambitions.
The FACT (I'll call it a fact since Hachette didn't deny it) that Hachette waited
so long to respond to Amazon initially AND continues to drag their feet — while the authors (whom they claim are the victims of Amazon) suffer — and the FACT that they have now rejected TWO offers to compensate those same authors with the intention (evidenced by their own comments) of getting to the first legal opportunity to attempt to negotiate Agency pricing back — isn't just a
smoking gun.
He is also, at that point in his life, overly conscientious, perhaps because of his own repressed sense of guilt,
so he finds her reckless for having the
gun,
smoking, or using certain words in front of their children, but he knows what a great mother she is.
The city of Los Angeles, where thirty - four people had been killed in an August 1965 riot in the Watts section, was contemplating the purchase of bulletproof armored vehicles, each of which could be armed with a.30 - caliber machine
gun; a choice of
smoke screen, tear gas, or fire - extinguishing launchers; and a siren
so loud it was said to disable rioters.
So, unless they caught someone standing over the body with the
smoking gun or dripping knife in her hands, they'd be hard - pressed to make a case without help from an outside agency.
As noted above, Amazon's CreateSpace fails on the top two bullets,
so this isn't a
smoking -
gun list.
Explosions,
gun fire,
smoke effects, and lightning look
so rich, realistic and vibrant despite its earthy color palette.
However, I should point out that Ubisoft also featured some Beyond Good & Evil trivia in their pre-E3 hype last year,
so this is far from a
smoking gun.
Typical gear such as darts,
smoke bombs, and
guns are at your disposal as well, but Syndicate's hand - to - hand combat is
so satisfying that you likely won't find yourself using these unless you're up against enemies that are a higher level than you.
So far, the game looks like an intriguing blend of Silent Hill (without the
smoke), very big
guns and the excellent film «Dark City».
So, this paper probably shouldn't be seen as a
smoking gun for global warming, nor should confirmation of the results in the paper be seen as a crucial test for global warming theory in general.
WFA's «Information Council for the Environment» that Gelbspan
so widely touts as
smoking gun evidence of a top - down industry directive «to reposition global warming as theory rather than fact «lasted just six months ** [See Author's 12/19/14 note below] in its entirety, with the actual PR tour being restricted to just three cities in May of 1991 and maybe a single 60 - second national radio ad on Rush Limbaugh's program at that time.
Worse, the
so - called
smoking gun core evidence for the accusation, leaked memos attributed to the obscure Western Fuels Association's 1991 «Information Council for the Environment» (ICE) public relations campaign are not what Naomi Oreskes, Al Gore, Ross Gelbspan and others say they are.
He chose not to do
so, perhaps unaware that published figures 1G versus 4.3 C provided conclusive «
smoking gun» evidence without studying the gory SI data details in the SI Excel spreadsheet.
One truly has to wonder what alternate reality Phil Shabecoff lives in, regarding his «crimes against humanity» comment at Gelbspan's post, which happens to be an insider's reference to Gelbspan's 2004 Boiling Point book chapter 3 title, «Criminals Against humanity,» which contains on page 51 Gelbspan's favorite phrase bit of
so - called
smoking gun evidence, the leaked memo phrase «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.»
The war was sold as a preventative measure, otherwise the «
smoking gun» as Condi
so dramatically put it, might well be a mushroom cloud.
Gelbspan has been the hero of the whole movement, Greenpeace director Phil Radford says has been the lone voice on this issue — but Gore now suddenly credits an NY Times article writer, and Gore himself had the
so - called
smoking gun memos in his Senate office around the same time in 1991?
So, what we have here from Bud Ward is little more than half the story, with the basic idea of trusting Gelbspan as some kind of highly regarded investigative journalist who found
smoking gun proof that skeptic climate scientists are shills paid by the fossil fuel industry to lie to the public.
No one is dumb enough to claim that their CFD model is the «
smoking gun» that proves that their new airliner wing is better than all the rest,
so no testing is required.
Nobody would be
so foolish as to claim that their computer model is the «
smoking gun» that establishes beyond doubt that cold fusion is real and we should invest billions of dollars in it.
So where's the
smoking gun?
«
So far there is no «
smoking gun» in this environmental mystery.»
The lack of a «
smoking gun» in the tropical troposphere does nothing to negate the overwhelming evidence that third generation GCMs are largely correct, even as they're being updated and upgraded to better account for clouds, aerosols, black carbon, and
so on.
There is a theoretcial link between increase in both variance and persistence and forewarning of climatic transitions and that some retrospective candidates have been identified but
so far no
smoking gun for impending transition be clearly apparent.
So an unseen 1991 memo, declared to be taken out - of - context, is the real
smoking gun behind all this cruelty and dispute?