Sentences with phrase «so than dividends»

Not exact matches

Peabody's problems have only expanded so far in 2015: Forecasting greater losses than originally anticipated, the company reduced its dividend, laid off workers and even cut the salaries of its top executives temporarily in a desperate attempt to keep the company afloat.

So are rents higher than dividends?

Hotel REITs pay out just 73 % of their available cash flow, so these firms have greater potential for dividend growth than other sectors.

I absolutely do not believe that mutual funds are a better investment than individual stocks (companies that pay rising dividends over time) over the long run, so I invest the rest of my savings in a taxable account (as well as maxing out my Roth IRA every year, of which individual stocks are purchased).

Pass - throughs will counter that in many cases, people who own stock through 401 (k) s and IRAs don't have to pay capital gains or dividend taxes, and so their profits are only taxed at the corporate rate, which is lower than the top individual rate (and would be much lower under this plan), putting pass - throughs at a potential disadvantage.

Mutual life insurance companies are owned by their policyholders so, if the insurer brings in more money than is spent, the profits are distributed as dividends.

So, while more boring than they once were, U.S. financials may be well positioned to potentially provide a dividend stream.

So, you may be receiving dividends, but you're paying a lot more money out than those dividends are worth.

Can dividend investing help smoothing this out, so you will not be pressed that much selling your stocks for income (4 % rule) and using dividends rather than your principal.

CIX has a dividend streak of 6 years and their 2015 dividend was higher than 2014, so I've moved them back to the All - Star tab.

«Dividends in 2015 were lower than 2014 because in 2014 dividends changed from semi-annual to quarterly so 1 semi-annual dividend of $ 0.04 and three quarterly payments of $ 0.0225 were recorded in 2014 which inflated dividendsDividends in 2015 were lower than 2014 because in 2014 dividends changed from semi-annual to quarterly so 1 semi-annual dividend of $ 0.04 and three quarterly payments of $ 0.0225 were recorded in 2014 which inflated dividendsdividends changed from semi-annual to quarterly so 1 semi-annual dividend of $ 0.04 and three quarterly payments of $ 0.0225 were recorded in 2014 which inflated dividendsdividends in 2014.

In both companies cases the 2016 dividends recorded are higher than 2015 so the streaks are maintained.

«GCG switched from an annual dividend of $ 0.20 to quarterly dividends of $ 0.05 in 2013 so dividends in 2013 were $ 0.30 ($ 0.20 + 0.05 + 0.05) which was higher than 2014, but quarterly dividends where increased in 2014 so the dividend streak was maintained.»

When things turn south, everything turns south so there had better be more than a 3 % dividend yield and some underperforming appreciation to compensate.

So far I've more than doubled my initial investment in the past couple years, much more than the meager returns offered by dividend stocks.

Companies in mature industries like consumer staples and utilities have fewer growth opportunities so they can share cash flow with investors through dividends rather than plow it all back into projects.

Keep in mind than many of these payments were merely advances on the expected 2013 payouts so dividend income will be much lower in 2013.

So no surprise that my weighted average dividend yield is lower in 2017 than 2016.

The myth that dividends are so much safer than growth is just that, a myth.

Their cost of capital is a function partly of low interest rates and part of the implicit share price is a function of the fact that investors have looked at equities for dividends rather than bonds for yield because the bond market is so expensive.

This ETF yields 3.4 % on dividend, so saving small money into this ETF may provide a lot better return than saving money in a savings account where we can receive 0.90 % APY only.

IBM has a payout ratio of 49 %, using less than half its adjusted income to support its dividend, so there's plenty of room to support future increases.

Corporations are generating more cash than they can reinvest, so dividends, buybacks and acquisitions are on the rise.

It's only been a few months since I created the dividend fund but the return of 17.2 % has beaten the S&P 500 by more than 3 % and that's not including the 1.35 % return on dividends collected so far.

But if you care more about cash in the pocket (dividends) that grow reliably every year than SO is a great choice.

The holdings in my Niche Fund pay quarterly dividends so some months will have more income reflected than others.

But interestingly, the Valuentum Dividend Cushion ™ ratio indicated that Marriott should have never cut its dividend, and sure enough, two years after the firm did so, it raised it to levels that were higher than before Dividend Cushion ™ ratio indicated that Marriott should have never cut its dividend, and sure enough, two years after the firm did so, it raised it to levels that were higher than before dividend, and sure enough, two years after the firm did so, it raised it to levels that were higher than before the cut.

The primary attraction for investors is that lower rated borrowers pay a higher rate of interest than investment grade borrowers, so bank loan funds and ETFs typically offer a higher dividend yield.

Keep in mind that HASI's has maintained a more predictable dividend growth profile than the mREIT peers, so from a risk / return perspective, I consider HASI's platform more appealing.

Dividend income is tax - free for lower - rate tax payers in the UK, for instance, so you may find you «take home» more than you did when working!

The club is there to make money for the shareholders of whome most are on the board its NOT a club run as a footballing concern but a financial concern to make money so do nt tell me that the club is going in the right direction cos were are not we are static and will remain so until the board take an interest in football rather than shares and dividends.

Non-participating whole life (Non-par) insurance eliminates the dividend, so the cash buildup is less than for a par policy.

Assuming the company decides not to pay a dividend to the shareholders (so the shareholders can reinvest the money themselves), financial managers within Pfizer must identify new projects that offer a higher rate of return than what they could get if they simply invested the money in the financial market (this being the opportunity cost of capital).

I am not really complaining and spotted this possibility some time ago and started drawing more than necessary from the Riffs at the beginning of the tear instead of at the end so that some of thr Riff withdrawal could earn dividend or capital gains over a year instead of remaining in the Riff to eventually be taxed at the highest possible rate.

This is a total cumulative return of 111 % ($ 11,090 / $ 10,000 = 1.11 = 111 %), which represents a compound annual return of 7.75 %.1 Without considering dividends, $ 10,000 would have grown to about $ 16,000 (due to the 60 % price increase), so the 10 year cumulative return was increased by more than $ 5,000 by reinvesting all dividends.

The taxation of dividends is less than interest earned on bonds or certificates of deposit so that is one very good reason why dividends are attractive to an investor in a taxable investment account.

Holding foreign equities in a TFSA can result in a bit of tax leakage since foreign dividends are generally subject to a 15 % withholding tax before they hit your TFSA, so your yield is slightly lower than it might otherwise be.

ETFs that screen for companies paying higher - than - average dividends will inevitably include fewer names, and some include just 30 or so.

Dividends are more stable than earnings, so the payout ratio certainly varies over time.

So if I understand correctly this means that the fund manager will first decide what the quarterly dividend is going to be and then if the companies in the fund pay out more than that of the quarterly dividend he wants to give out then he will reinvest the money into the companies in the fund.

In fact, for Canadians who make less than $ 40,000 or so, the tax rate on dividends is actually negative, which means you can use them to lower the amount of tax you pay on other income.

International equities are the least tax - efficient (because they are not eligible for the dividend tax credit and they have a higher yield than US equities), so they should be the first candidate.

Further, Berkshire Hathaway's mandate is making money from investment and compound returns, so reinvestment is more important than making profit and paying dividends.

Surge Energy also announced a 15 % increase in dividends as well, so I'm hoping 2017 will see even more dividend income than I expected.

My family is not relying on dividend income to support our lifestyles yet as we are pretty young so until then we will purely driven by performance of the total portfolio including dividend and capital gains rather than dividend income alone.

If companies can not find a better way of spending its net income to boost overall returns than paying out dividends for the owners, then it makes senses for them to pay out dividends so that shareholders can take the money and invest in elsewhere.

So rather than scaling up, they decide to pay a portion of the profits as a dividend to the share holders.

No, the tax rates apply first to your «ordinary income» (income from sources other than long - term capital gains or qualifying dividends) so these items that are taxed at special rates won't push your other income into a higher tax bracket.

Interest from savings accounts, bonds and GICs is taxed at a higher rate than dividends or capital gains, so you benefit more by keeping them in a TFSA.

So, the dividend yield is about the same but SAP has a much higher return on equity and net profit margin than L. SAP has also typically trades at a premium to Loblaws.