Scientists are enormously respected in the public discourse, far more
so than politicians or journalists.
Not exact matches
Politicians tell a lot of stories in their campaign speeches, and there's a not -
so - secret reason why: if you convey your message through a dynamic story or metaphor, it has a better chance of resonating with your audience
than if you were to simply state the facts.
But then, newspapers have often been more
than happy to print ridiculous assertions by their favorite
politicians,
so that's not really anything new.
In a speech in Berlin in late November, Polish
politician Radek Sikorski declared, «I will probably be the first Polish foreign minister in history to say
so, but here it is: I fear German power less
than I am beginning to fear German inactivity.»
You know or SHOULD know, (you sound pretty stupid
so you might not) that
politicians make decisions based on their faith,
so when people find someone with a different faith
than theirs running for the highest office, it makes sense that they are uneasy with it.
There is
so much more to this issue
than what is reported on the news or by the various
politicians.
The rich are better able to benefit those in political office
than are the poor;
so they are more courted by
politicians.
I realise that many rabbis, Jews as well as the Israeli
politicians will castigate me for trying to start a religious war for being
so verbal, since our greatest adversary (those who wants to destroy us by converting us rather
than killing us) are also our most fervent supporters.
Even
so, the twenty - seven speeches collected in We Are the Change We Seek: The Speeches of Barack Obama, edited by E. J. Dionne Jr. and Joy - Ann Reid, are neither better nor worse, for the most part,
than any other American
politician's speeches: often muddled, consistently unmemorable, and boring.
Gun manufacturers know firearms better
than politicians so they will always tweak the mouse trap to not meet the definition of an «assault weapon».
Ivan Gazidis can make people think silver is worth more
than gold he's an excellent speech artist he could be a
politician he should be a
politician he talks that much BS he's a compulsive liar and we fall for it every year he's probably already pre rehearsing his AGM speech whiles hes sightseeing in Dortmund but there's only
so much c * ap you can talk before people start to wake up.
In the social media world, where things move faster
than a
politician changing his stand on issues, people are more ready to use you as a step stool to the next level
so that makes it a bit difficult to know who to trust and who not to.
At the meeting in November, Helen Gray and Clare Meynell gave an excellent presentation on the WBTi project, explaining why
politicians should care about breastfeeding and how current practices result in
so many mothers stopping breastfeeding much earlier
than they wanted to.
So is he a better
politician now, in his mid-50s,
than when he started?
So, what has Fayemi done that is worse
than what all
politicians are accused of?
You have models in the case of road transport where the algorithms may be proprietary and not available, but they are being made to determine government policy nevertheless, because it is convenient for
politicians to say, «The reasons we are building these roads is because the computer said
so», rather
than — «I decided that we would have more roads because I want to see more roads.»
The country's «internal conundrum of military versus civilian power must be slowly resolved in favour of civilian, but civilian
politicians must be much more responsible to the nation
than they have been
so far» (p. 210).
The ideal proportion of income to tax is something for experts and
politicians to decide, but proportionality is fairer
than so - called «progressive» taxation as everybody knows that they will pay a fair share of their income into the kitty.
«It is a democratic party... indeed we mid-wifed this Constitution that led to the Fourth Republic
so we are more committed to the Fourth Republic
than any other
politician party in the country.
«While we're complaining — could
politicians trying to talk about policy do
so in an intelligent way, rather
than preaching disaster and standing outside Greggs?
It leaves us to believe Bob Turner would do anything for political power including associating himself with one of the most corrupt
politician in years who stole more
than Tony Seminerio, Sheldon Leffeler, Brian McLaughlin, and
so on and
so on.
So it beggars belief that at a time when there are more than 80,000 empty homes in London alone, when concerns about food supply and the need for agricultural security are becoming more urgent, when our cities are at last beginning to revive thanks to densification strategies and the link between suburban sprawl and car dependency is so obvious, that politicians and think - tankers should begin to consider sacrificing the green belt for greedy house builder
So it beggars belief that at a time when there are more
than 80,000 empty homes in London alone, when concerns about food supply and the need for agricultural security are becoming more urgent, when our cities are at last beginning to revive thanks to densification strategies and the link between suburban sprawl and car dependency is
so obvious, that politicians and think - tankers should begin to consider sacrificing the green belt for greedy house builder
so obvious, that
politicians and think - tankers should begin to consider sacrificing the green belt for greedy house builders.
In «Yes Minister», Sir Humphrey is infinitely more intelligent
than Jim Hacker, and invariably tries to frustrate whatever changes the
politician wants to make to the system - but, if given an instruction, he follows it: it would be against his sense of his professional pride for him not to do
so.
The
politicians and the media don't really know as much as the people pushing the buttons do [humanists],
so they are almost unwitting accomplices in breaking down barriers which will eventually lead to people being more vulnerable
than they are today.
Politicians, who as a general rule are better
than most at public speaking, rarely deliver lines
so agonisingly and cringeworthily terrible that journalists drop their pens in disgust.
To take tax dollars which are scarce, we're spending more
than any other state, we're taxing more, and giving it to
politicians so they could have robocalls and have dinners is not something I think we should be spending our money on.»
He is
so much more refreshing
than other
politicians.
It is
so refreshing to back a candidate who is more an activist
than a
politician, who believes in something other
than their own self - interest, and who, like Bernie, will certainly mobilize thousands of enthusiastic voters to rally behind his candidacy,» NYPAN Co-Chairman George Albro said in a statement.
«Yes, I understand we have peace in this country but we shouldn't forget most of these countries that had war used to be most peaceful
than Ghana but considering how some
politicians have taken this year's elections as a «Do and Die Affair» we need to start preaching peace and start telling everyone that we want peace before, during and after elections —
so that anyone who's planning anything evil can know that we Ghanaians are not interested» she said.
So, by some form of voting system — I think it's closer to propawtional representation
than furs past the post — the
politicians get their constituents to vote online for their canine running mates, and then they have to do the «Doggy Dash» where they are forcibly raced through one of two narrow tubes.
Politicians change society,
so it is vital society debate them in death, rather
than restrict itself to piety.
In the weeks leading up to the election, Diaz was
so confident, he declined more
than $ 200,000 in public financing and announced he would tap veteran Bronx
politician Aurelia Greene to be his deputy B.P. And the rest is history.
«It is
so refreshing to back a candidate who is an activist and not a
politician, who believes in something other
than their own self - interest, and who, like Bernie, will certainly mobilize thousands of enthusiastic voters to rally behind her historic candidacy.»
The
politicians love it when you are half baked
than fully cooked
so that they can always manipulate you.
Am sure some people get the story of ogun APC wrong, the issue is not between Osoba and Amosun rather Amosun with other Apc stalwarts, started from his deputy, all the senators, all the reps, most of party leaders, mejority of assembly members in ogun state even some of the grass root members that worked for amosun's victory in 2011, despite all Osoba intervention with some traditional ruler, Amosun believe he can do it alone,
so am sure Osoba left with no option
than to stay with mejority followers and path away with Amosun, especially when Amosun always says that he need no
politician with him, even went to an extent of attacking ogun central senator with thugs and attempted to kill him.Also,short - changed Osoba's people in last APC congress in the state.But, after the result in Ekiti, he started realizing that he need them only for his 2015 victory but not in his government or in the party..
In voting down the idea of elected mayors
so widely, and by turning their back on this week's police elections in such vast numbers, the people seem to have understood far better
than the
politicians how unattractive that patchwork is.
As for my other offences, I have to say that I think that most
politicians tell the truth, more
so than most other human beings.
There is cross-party agreement on other reforms including ensuring that the House of Commons, rather
than MPs, employs staff -
so politicians» relatives can not be hired without scrutiny - and clamping down on earnings outside parliament.
After ignoring the party's grassroots for
so many years, they are partly responsible for Corbyn's success in the first place; while the future of this party is about a lot more
than the neat career plans of a few professional
politicians at the top.
South Korea's main spy agency told
politicians in a closed - door briefing after the test that it does not think Pyongyang currently has the ability to develop miniaturised nuclear weapons which can be mounted on ballistic missiles, but intelligence officials expressed worries that the North's efforts to do
so are progressing quicker
than previously thought, said Kim Byungkee, of the opposition Minjoo Party.
IPCC faces more criticism from
politicians than ever: In the wake of the revelations about the Himalayan glaciers data, the U.K. director of Greenpeace called for Pachauri to step down;
so has Senator John Barrasso (R - WY) and others.
«If you're wondering why
so many
politicians and news sources deny that dangerous human - caused climate change is real, and you want a relatively short and easy - to - read summary of the issue, look no further
than The Madhouse Effect»
So perhaps, if politicians were so concerned about the opioid epidemic as they seem to be, they might want to investigate marijuana as a safer alternative, rather than continuing to fight a losing battle against i
So perhaps, if
politicians were
so concerned about the opioid epidemic as they seem to be, they might want to investigate marijuana as a safer alternative, rather than continuing to fight a losing battle against i
so concerned about the opioid epidemic as they seem to be, they might want to investigate marijuana as a safer alternative, rather
than continuing to fight a losing battle against it.
mmm... a protagonist who complete dominates a long film to the detriment of context and the other players in the story (though the abolitionist, limping senator with the black lover does gets close to stealing the show, and is rather more interesting
than the hammily - acted Lincoln); Day - Lewis acts like he's focused on getting an Oscar rather
than bringing a human being to life - Lincoln as portrayed is a strangely zombie character, an intelligent, articulate zombie, but still a zombie; I greatly appreciate Spielberg's attempt to deal with political process and I appreciate the lack of «action» but somehow the context is missing and after seeing the film I know some more facts but very little about what makes these
politicians tick; and the lighting is way too stylised, beautiful but unremittingly unreal,
so the film falls between the stools of docufiction and costume drama, with costume drama winning out; and the second subject of the film - slavery - is almost complete absent (unlike Django Unchained) except as a verbal abstraction
So the next time some chump
politician gets out there and says «let's have a toad day out» or «let's go and kill as many toads as we can with spike axes and picks or something like that, they think «this is bullshit, this guy is a vapid idiot who has nothing better to do
than incite people to kill a defenceless animal».
So how to keep conservatives in the charter fold other
than by tying the issue to particular
politicians, especially one as toxic as Trump?
First and foremost, you should check out Paul Tough's NYT Sunday Magazine look at Roseland and at young Barack Obama's notion that he could do more to alleviate poverty as a
politician than as a community organizer — which at least
so far hasn't happened.
But from the businessmen and
politicians point of view, it's
so much easier to make the good schools worse
than it is to improve the struggling schools.
«This person couldn't be that much worse
than what we have going now, and he sounds a lot different
than the
politicians that I have been hearing for
so many years, ad nauseam.
-- also while a bubble in German property is quite possible / likely in the medium term, they tend to have more conservative banks and less captured
politicians (they've already started tightening lending regulations before the bubble is even started), and a more reluctant attitude to debt
than most other Europeans,
so it is likely to be more muted
than Spanish / English / Irish style bubbles.