Sentences with phrase «so using less fuel»

Programming multiple trucks to travel in convoys would be beneficial, too: one truck could draft behind another, reducing air resistance and so using less fuel.

Electric power makes the engines more efficient, so they use less fuel.

Not exact matches

It lays out an initial strategy to reduce emissions by encouraging shipping companies to make their ship designs more energy efficient, use alternative fuels or energy sources and streamline operations so that they consume less energy.

We've figured out a cost - effective way to do that so you can end up with a 66 - mile - per - gallon uncompromised SUV that has half the normal weight, has a third the normal fuel use, is safer, and repays the extra cost that comes with being a hybrid in less than two years.

In addition, only about one tenth of the mined uranium ore is converted into fuel in the enrichment process (during which the concentration of uranium 235 is increased considerably), so less than a hundredth of the ore's total energy content is used to generate power in today's plants.

You're obviously you're burning — you're putting less sugar into your body so you're using more ketones for fuel.

While dieting or performing intense exercise, your body typically has less carbohydrate fuel available, so sometimes it will break muscle tissue down to use amino acids as fuel instead.

It's all about eating healthy and eating a bit less than you need each day, so that your body uses your excess body fat for fuel.

yes i agree... i only use 130 as a generalization... and yes the conditioned individual can mobilize triglycerides out of the muscle at a heart rate over 130, which in the conditioned individual will be used in the mitochondria for fuel... however in the unconditioned individual the triglycerides mobilize but then re-form back in the muscle as fat and so are not used as fuel... science is yet to really explain why this happens... but in my experience the conditioned individual is just more efficient at burning fat... and the unconditioned individual is simply in the process of becoming more efficient... so i recommend the unconditioned individual start with cardio that is less intense below 130... then when they get more conditioned through the resistance training... i will recommend more intense cardio over 130 beats...

So if you want to reduce your body fat you're going to have to train your body to use more fat as fuel and less carbohydrate.

Bike was not winterized, as we did not expect not to use it for that long (procrastinated for months to spend four hours it took me to get it ready), so the fuel breakdown and hygroscopic issues are a concern (although, from my experience with less - demanding boat two - stroke, even couple - years old fuel can be used sometimes).

So get ready to save more on fuel and enjoy extra cargo room, all for less than ever, when you choose a used Prius!

Vauxhall has gone to great lengths to reduce the weight of the Astra so that less fuel is used when accelerating and to improve its aerodynamics so at cruising speeds it slips through the air using less power.

We fill the fuel tank on every used vehicle we sell, so you can have one less stress in your buying process!

Speaking of fuel, I adore the fact that the diesel engine uses less fuel on the interstate, so we are able to not have to fill up as often.

It's better for the environment, too — because it weighs less than other clay litters, more packages fit in a truckload and fewer trucks are needed to ship it, so less fuel gets used.

Last year, All Nippon Airlines asked passengers to use the lavatories before they board flights so as to reduce the overall weight of the plane, which would ultimately be better for the environment as it would mean less fuel usage.

After a thousand years or so, those have mostly decayed away and the spent fuel is less biologically hazardous than the uranium ore used to produce it.

So as we replace oil with fuels like natural gas and biofuels, we can also reduce our dependence by making cars and trucks that use less oil in the first place.

But because tons and power increased so much, the average new car sold in 2009 used only 10 to 15 percent less fuel per kilometer than one sold in 1990, when the present fuel economy standards maxed out.

Ramping up the tax by $ 5 a year would shrink the use of carbon fuels so drastically that, by my calculations, US carbon emissions in 2030 would be 40 percent less than they were in 2005 (a standard baseline year).

A tax Cap - and - trade can only work by raising the price of lower - priced hydrocarbon fuels, so that people are forced either to use higher - priced alternatives or to use less energy.

These assume a continuation of the past exponential growth rate of atmospheric CO2 of around 0.5 % per year despite a dramatic decrease of the population growth rate to less than one - third of the past rate so, even if the world per capita fossil - fuel based energy use increases by 50 %, these are most likely «upper limits» themselves.

I can build the same size home (timber frame) using sips on a foundation for a lot less than $ 200.00 per sq. ft.. It is going to be just as energy efficient as the one in the article and even more so since it doesn't need a fuel guzzling truck to move it.

Far and above all the other so - called evidence used in attempts to show that a sinister industry plot exists is what I term the core evidence: the set of leaked memos from way back in 1991 — supposedly from the Western Fuels Association's «Information Council for the Environment» (ICE) public relations campaign — containing the alleged strategy to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» where the targeted audience was «older, less educated males» and «younger, lower income women.»

Actually, if you properly do the math - and count if you count the whole nuclear fuel cycle, not just the power plant, not just the core of the reactor, but the occlusion zone, the uranium mining and so on, it turns out that wind power uses hundreds or thousands of times less land per kilowatt hour, then nuclear does.

Less than 2 % of U.S. electricity is generated from oil, so using electricity as a transportation fuel would greatly reduce dependence on imported petroleum, thus contributing to our national security.»

Thought we had reasonable solution to use less fossil fuels, so we're still impact our ecology, unfortunate!

So less fuel used overall means more reserves to last longer for the almost 7 billion people living on Earth as of right now and less pollution.

If that family uses less fossil fuel energy than average, their increased costs will be less than $ 1,000, so they'll come out ahead.)

I fly Porter out of the Island, which uses (so they say) relatively low - impact planes, and much less taxi time and fuel for me, as I live and work downtown in Toronto.