Sentences with phrase «so valid results»

For the assessment system as a whole, PARCC is committed to ensuring that all participating students, including students with disabilities, English learners, and English learners with disabilities, are able to engage in a meaningful and appropriate manner so valid results can be obtained for all students.

Not exact matches

But philosophy publishes results which claim to be universally valid if they are valid at all, so we now turn with our question to philosophy.

So teach everything, from choosing and following a protocol to deciding how many repetitions are needed, within your system, for a valid result.

This procedure amplifies both the valid and invalid data, though, so researchers have to apply more stringent filters to their results.

Those responsible for selecting assessments will benefit from knowing that «less is more» so that type I errors (false positives) are avoided and all assessment results are reliable, valid, and useful for their intended purpose.

So while the SGPs were relatively «reliable,» meaning that they produced consistent results over time, there is no reason to believe that they are valid, meaning that they are actually measuring what they are said to measure.

So while this new signal will influence the ranking of some search results, we won't be removing any pages from search results unless we receive a valid copyright removal notice from the rights owner.

AFAI Understand, while the estimation could be off, it will be off consistently for each category, only changing some kind of «scale» factor, so the results are still valid.

So far this has delivered more positive results as often a set up will deliver R1, then retrace and from another «trigger» signal (candle formation) at a similar level offering another opportunity to achieve R1 again, even if after that the market moves against the two or three valid «set up» triggers This article provides welcome confirmation that whilst I am not managing my trades from a money management perspective exactly as yourself, my method is similarly aligned

So they vary that one - dimensional input, and then the simulator can produce valid results.

It's not the perfect methodology by any means — mainly because TripAdvisor doesn't appear to give all hotels a star rating so not all the top hotels were included and because Rocketmiles offers up so few hotels — but it's a level playing field so the results are still valid.

So the detrended results are demonstrably less valid.

So, when I see posts like # 2, I am reminded that there is a concerted campaign being waged here in the United States to disseminate doubt about valid climate science results.

Re M Tobis» musings on climate scientist's special insight / intuition that allows them to discern results denied to other people so the strictures of statistics do not apply to them in their climate work as their intuition allows them to produce valid results without following strict statistical procedures.

So the results from the Curry et al study is valid for the surface data diagnostics as given in the Forest et al. (2006, GRL) study.

It is also of interest to the scientists who thinks «Well my results say xxx, and so does everyone else's, so xxx is probably a valid result».

It is there but they simply can't see it and this is not so much the fault of science or the result of science or valid at all scientifically but because so much of their self worth is tied up with this communal world view.

Under the scientific method, for example, the so - called «consensus» so strongly advocated by the Climate - Industrial Complex (CIC) should have absolutely no role in determining science — only results derived by using the scientific method, the basis for evaluating what is and is not valid science.

The two periods are of different length, and at different temperature levels, with different error bars, and we already know from Cowtan & Way and other basic observations that the so - called «global» dataset isn't representative of the scale of the change but tends to minimize differences: you can't simply subtract one rate from the other and get a valid result.

But most of the informed scientific community that are accepting this are doing so in the knowledge that it is valid research using legitimate methodologies with credible results.

Of course, whether or not the authors of a paper agree with presenting its results on a different, inconsistent basis in no way shows that doing so was valid, nor that there was anything wrong with the basis on which they were originally presented.

The Forster / Gregory 06 results were obtained and presented in a form that accurately reflected the characteristics of the data, with error bands and details of error distribution assumptions, so permitting a valid PDF for S to be computed, and compared with the IPCC's version.

He made his paper look like science when it wasn't, and his analysis included so many assumptions that his results were not valid.

Fortunately, the achievements of CrowdJustice so far indicate that there are many people willing to donate under these conditions and that as a result it has been possible to bring to court valid claims that might otherwise have been un-redressed.

The previous adjournments had been as a result of NNPC's appeal against the award in Nigeria and so fell within section 103 (5), and the requirement for NNPC to give security was valid.

This is going to be the complicated part, but all you really care about is the results and when enough of those calculations get confirmed then that transaction gets confirmed and we create this ledger that can be conceived of in the form of blocks that show this is valid, this is valid, and so on.

If, at the time of enforcement (divorce), the court finds that the circumstances of the parties have changed so far beyond what they contemplated at the time the agreement was made as to result in an injustice, the court may hold that the agreement is not valid.

Just as in religion, valid logic breaks down so we deem the result to follow from the premise, even though we know we can't prove it follows by any empirical system.

If I administer an intelligence test to you this week and you get a score of 120 (brilliant person), and then next week I administer the same intelligence to you and you get a score of 80 (not so smart), then the results of my intelligence test assessment CAN NOT possibly be a valid (true) indicator of your intelligence because it does not give reliable (stable) results.

The results showed a valid and reliable scale with robust reliability coefficients that will use it to measure perceptions of quality in the relationship, and so contribute to research in psychology to reach an understanding of the nature of the duration, maintenance, repair, or even breaking them.