Sentences with phrase «so without religions»

Not exact matches

In doing so, Hitchens summed up the mantras of the new atheism: that «faith is a fairy tale», that it is possible to be «good without God» and that religion is not just false, but evil.

Concern that relatives have been baptized without their knowledge, and if memory serves the Catholic faith does not consider Mormons a valid religion so if someone is baptized after death how does this affect their Catholic faith.

Sure, their motives were good, but if you yourself are a person of faith, would you want someone initiating you (posthumously, so clearly without your authorization) into a religion with views incompatible with your own?

I'm moving to a country with an atheist president soon where I can practice my religion without being exposed to so many vicious bigots.

Without the brainwashing effect organized religions have on it's followers, this would never have gotten so big.

it's insane how you know so little of your own religion and how you go against your Christs teaching with such arrogant and disdain towards atheist and other religions your nothing but a bigot and hatemonger your world is only black and white and you can't fathom how a country can have so many different people with different believes that don't match yours and can live peacefully without your christs.

It's an ability that some people simply don't have, so they turn to religion... But those of us who have fully functioning brains can have morality without being told how to act...

Dala — Right, so without scripture (religion), what would Jesus be?

Lay Church - goers seeking consolation rather than understanding from their religion often form «lord of the flies» packs to silence they fellow lay persons who refuse to drink the KoolAid without an explanation for why they should do so.

Always needing to be right, always needing to be in charge and control, always too busy and self - centered for others and always trying to figure out ways that you can profit from God, the Bible, church and religion tells me who you are, in which case I care not what you think about what the Bible says, whether or not it is without error and so on.

So, I have to ask, how can a «catholic engineer» possibly do his / her job competently without putting aside religion?

This, however, forces a question, and not one without some controversy: If religion was so central to the thought of Irving Kristol, then is this equally the case regarding the political persuasion with which he is so intimately associated?

Just as once we used to look at man statically, that is, without antecedents, without evolutionary origins but instead as coming directly from above, so we still look on religion and faith.

Whether they did so quietly in the shadows, or publicly standing in the town square, whether they did so out of religious training or from a deep sense of justice and compassion without religion - we must remember the actions of these people and hold them as our heroes.

Without his putting himself in a religious frame of mind, creating for himself religious experiences, awakening within himself a so - called natural consciousness of God, thus without his being compelled to adopt forms of consciousness which he can no longer recapture, he must be encountered in his life, which has become secular, by the good news from the Lord of the world, who has committed himself in the man Jesus of Nazareth to the world and the secularity of the stable and the gallows («without the camp» of religion, Hebrews 13Without his putting himself in a religious frame of mind, creating for himself religious experiences, awakening within himself a so - called natural consciousness of God, thus without his being compelled to adopt forms of consciousness which he can no longer recapture, he must be encountered in his life, which has become secular, by the good news from the Lord of the world, who has committed himself in the man Jesus of Nazareth to the world and the secularity of the stable and the gallows («without the camp» of religion, Hebrews 13without his being compelled to adopt forms of consciousness which he can no longer recapture, he must be encountered in his life, which has become secular, by the good news from the Lord of the world, who has committed himself in the man Jesus of Nazareth to the world and the secularity of the stable and the gallows («without the camp» of religion, Hebrews 13without the camp» of religion, Hebrews 13:13) 15

Elsewhere Franklin emphasized the importance of general religion when he wrote, «If men are so wicked as we now see them with religion, what would they be without it?

That through which all religion lives, religious reality, goes in advance of the morphology of the age and exercises a decisive effect upon it; it endures in the essence of the religion which is morphologically determined by culture and its phases, so that this religion stands in a double influence, a cultural, limited one from without and an original and unlimited one from within.

Why not form an opinion totally based on how you «feel» or your «emotions» and justify your argument on why you feel that way, rather than saying «for the bible tells me so»... That's why we can't move forward on issues in this country; people feel they can't express themselves without the safety of a group's opinion... Let's listen to ourselves for once instead of having your daddy's politics and religion handed down to you like a family asset.

If you want to believe in a religion, so be it, but for «god's» sake, please allow your children to see and absorb all that is around them, without your bigoted narrow view.

After Smith, the government would be free to penalize, punish, or prevent the exercise of religion without serious constitutional scrutiny so long as the law applied to nonreligious entities as well.

Before that book was printed, all the way from the roman empire to martin luther, the catholic church had everyone under a salesman's spell since the people were afraid, and in some cases depended on the church to protect them, so they just bought all the religion without even knowing what really went into and if that information was trustworthy.

What shocks me is that so many's argument for religion is that it provides you with a moral compass and without religion everybody would kill each other.

Here's the REALITY: There will NEVER be a world without religion, so the best we can do is decide which religions have shown that they can live in relative peace with others in a civil society?

So muslims can't go out publicly drinking without penalty, but christians and jews and hindus and buddhists and everyone else can - because the «barbaric» muslim country decided that religious laws should only apply to those who follow that religion.

The Pilgrims escaped England so they could practice their religion without interference from the Church of England, the state - approved way to believe.

It is the question so often asked in high school classes, either in relation to thc study of other religions or of missions: Can people be saved without Jesus?

Remember, his religion REQUIRES him to do so!!!! I am a Gator Alumnus who is sure glad Tebow went to my school because of the class individual that he is, and even though I do not consider myself religious, I would love for one of my daughters to walk in through our front door with somebody like him, even without the fame or millions.

Humanity can evolve just fine without religion if we genuinely appreciate how precious life is here on earth and stop trying so hardto find this mythical thing called heaven.

But even without religious beliefs, we'd still not all agree on things like that, so here's a more practical reason to argue against religion:

(Look at the women in Ireland and The Dominican Rep. who died because of being denied an abortion recently) You are SO correct about Hitler being a xstian, google away... «Secular schools can never be tolerated because such a school has no religious instruction and a general moral instruction without a religious foundation is built on air; consequently, all character training and religion must be derived from faith... We need believing people.»

I chose to leave town, go back to school, get sober and quit being a destructive little sh1t without ever considering religion as a means to do so.

They are religious in the wider sense; yet in this acutest of all senses they are not so, and it is religion in the acutest sense that I wish, without disputing about words, to study first, so as to get at its typical differentia.)

Yet we can only speak in succession of what appears in contemporaneousness; in discourse we must abstract relations, such as love, from the terms related and the terms from each other, so that we are always in danger of speaking of God without reference to the being he loves and that loves him; of speaking about religion or love of God as distinct from ethics or the love of neighbor.

As for Pastor Mike and his atheist registry, like so many other strongly religious people I've encountered, he's equating religion with morality, as if, without religious belief (the right religious belief), you are incapable of possessing and living by a moral / ethical code.

So no, we wouldn't have a better world without religion because we will have more people killing then those of religion.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

Natural law is the bridge, so to speak, for Jews who want to leave the ghetto without becoming so assimilated that they abandon their religion: «What a natural law perspective does for Jews at this level is to enable them to make rights claims, but without having to adopt the type of all «embracing secularism that is antithetical to the covenantal basis of traditional Jewish life and thought.»

M.d religion is about man there is alot of man in the evangelical church as well as other churchs however the Holy spirit is the one we lean on to teach us Gods word he reveals the scriptures just as though Jesus was teaching his disciples in his day.Often after speaking in parable his disciples would ask what he meant and he would give them insight into the messages.I find for me if i struggle understanding a topic i ask the holy spirit to help me if you havent received him just invite him into your life if you have already confessed Jesus as your Lord and savior.We can not live a christian life without him.He is the one who empowers us to live righteously rather than according to our old nature.In the last year or so he has been showing me extraordinary insight into the word its new its fresh he is amazing.brentnz

you said that «Religions are flawed because «Churches» are managed by «people»... so that means that «Religion» and «churches» will ALWAYS be flawed because you can not have these things without people.

It is overtly obvious that the Framers wanted there to be separation of Church and State as they valued freedom... it is the act of protecting those types of freedoms that makes our country so great today where people of ALL religions (or lack thereof) can come to the US and work to make it the best country on Earth without fear of being persecuted for their beliefs.

Then, under the heat of new cultural pressures in the 1960s and beyond, most of what was substantial in such religion quickly evaporated, often almost without a trace and seldom with so much as a protest.

Anyone can claim anything using religion — that's what's so dangerous about religion — the fact that claims can be made without proof.

So anarchy is what you would be almost guaranteed to encounter — were religion actually put above the secular laws we can all follow without regards to our personal interpretations of «holy words»... do you see where I'm going with this?

So how about you keep your religious bullshit within your religion, without trying to poison our secular society with them.

It is so easy to take religion and make that the important thing but without the power of the Spirit to truly energize and electrify the Christan walk.

So did Dietrich Bonhoeffer when he named the kind of mainline religion he encountered in 1930s America: Protestantismus ohne Reformation, «Protestantism without the Reformation.»

One hopes it will do so without terrorism, demonization, political correctness or underestimation of the diversity internal to each religion.

GodPot: we're all adults, and likely nobody who still believes in any religion does so without some contemplation.

Only Christianity of all the world's major religions teaches that God came to Earth in Jesus Christ and became subject to suffering and death himself, dying on the cross to take the punishment our sins deserved, so that someday he can return to Earth to end all suffering without ending us.

So, too, with religion: Men might be violent, but without religion they would be worse.