Btw, TMNT is an Activision title
so wrong thread.
Not exact matches
You're on the
wrong thread again tommie and by the way you add more proof to the Truth of
so called atheists being liars than any other self deluded atheist on these blogs.
When I first heard about the concept of your new safe space website, I was thrilled, not
so much for myself to be honest as I love the uncensored environment of nakedpastor and have developed a rather tough skin over the years after numerous attempts at attending churches that billed themselves as safe spaces and eventually turned out to be anything but once you pulled the
wrong thread and it all started to unravel.
Also, if everyone on this
thread is
so convinced that faithful Christians are
wrong about this issue (laughably
wrong nonetheless) why does it bother them
so much when Christians express their view?
I am not a medical professional,
so please correct me if I am
wrong, but we do understand how much of an important role that stress hormones play in labour — the way medical professionals do talk about birth in terms of risk without paying attention to emotions (I am getting this from a somewhat flippant comment earlier on this
thread where the author says the would like to see 100 % c - section rate) does exacerbate the problem.
As I said yesterday, David Cameron made it perfectly clear during the leadership election that economic stability would be prioritised over unfunded tax cuts, and was subsequently elected by a significant majority of the party membership,
so anybody getting their knickers in a twist about him sticking by that policy (the title of this
thread is clearly
wrong) now is being unreasonable.
I haven't read the rest of this
thread because it's
so stupid,
so I'll just assume that everyone else is explaining why it's
wrong.
They seem to presume that Gavin's primary point in this
thread is to rationalize why climate models are
so wrong compared to reality, especially now they know for sure:
(Tried to post this comment earlier but wordpress is really annoying in not accepting my login
so I'm trying another address — and ended up in the
wrong thread.
So, the scientific
thread of albedo prediction from optical depth, Van de Hulst, Sagan and Pollack [Venusian runaway global warming], Lacis and Hansen is
wrong., the crutch for the high CO2 - AGW hypothesis is taken away, CO2 probably loses AGW monopoly via «polluted cloud heating».
There are plenty of
wrong ideas that are still held, or not yet disproven; this
thread, the original claim, was that Steve McIntyre's failed to self - audit his claims even
so far as to maintain an index of the influence of his auditing.
In the
thread above I have tried (in vain) to get Trenberth's critics to put their scientific reasons on the table why they think he is
wrong,
so that we could have a good science discussion.
I would expect that felonious child abuse would require the same sort of harm or
thread of harm as is typical with the named crime of extortion.And to win a case on habeas it ought to be very clear that the otherwise final judgement is somehow
wrong,
so I would say the majority is on pretty solid ground.