So almost all political, economic, and
social debate takes place within the context of the Catholic Church.
Not exact matches
With that cheeky introduction by host Carlos Watson, the PBS
debate show Point
Taken last night dove headlong into the fractious
debate of salary transparency that has been gaining steam of late, especially as a way to bridge widening wage gaps based on gender, race, and
social class.
We of course
take that side of the
debate which has concluded that Christianity has been the major cause of the relative peace and
social development which the West enjoys.
People also
take their opinions to
social media to
debate everything from Supreme Court decisions on abortion to #Brexit and much, much more.
They need to be able to explain to members what is happening in processes of
debate and resolution; and to do that in the midst of an often emotional give - and -
take is much more difficult than preparing a sermon on a
social issue.
The current
debate is about competence, and it
takes social structure for granted.
It's a topic that's
taken on increased interest and
debate, thanks to a handful of intelligent voices in
social and digital media shining new light.
Of course, there are those within the anti-Wenger camp who have
taken to
social media in the heat of the moment or after having a few and vented their frustrations without the use of a filter, but surely by this point enough former Wenger supporters have come forward and openly voiced their displeasure with the direction of this club that the
debate has moved from the realm of knee - jerk reactionaries to a place where rational thought trumps sheer bravado.
Supporters of every club say the same — recently I've seen this
taken for granted in
social media
debates amongst Manchester United and Chelsea fans.
Help us celebrate families and normalize feeding babies without
debate or judgment by
taking and sharing pictures on
social media.
Subsequent panels
took the challenges for democratic
debate and
social change in the neoliberal period that were presented in the earlier discussions and brought them to bear on concrete examples of resistance to neoliberal policy.
Posts — which
take just a few minutes to read — generate healthy
debate online and via
social media, and provide a rich source of information and evidence for policymaking.
Social Media Stoke Unrest and Ignite Web - Rights Debate: When the explosion in social networking helped topple repressive regimes last year, governments worldwide took notice, stepping up efforts to limit public Internet a
Social Media Stoke Unrest and Ignite Web - Rights
Debate: When the explosion in
social networking helped topple repressive regimes last year, governments worldwide took notice, stepping up efforts to limit public Internet a
social networking helped topple repressive regimes last year, governments worldwide
took notice, stepping up efforts to limit public Internet access.
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA — 87 % of scientists believe they and their peers should
take an active role in public policy
debates, according to a Pew Research Center report presented by Lee Rainie of the Pew Internet and American Life Project during «Scientists Engaging with Reporters, the Public, and
Social Media: Survey Findings,» a session yesterday at the annual meeting of AAAS, which publishes Science Careers.
At ESOF meetings leading scientists, researchers, young researchers, business people, entrepreneurs and innovators, policy makers, science and technology communicators and the general public from all over Europe discuss new discoveries and
debate the direction that research is
taking in the sciences, humanities and
social sciences.
Over the course of five days participants from across the scientific community will discuss and discover modern advancements in science and
debate the direction that research is
taking in the sciences, humanities and
social sciences.
«I think our findings speak to a
debate that has
taken place between people who think that
social media usage is bad for us and those who think it's good for us, and that
debate has not always been based on evidence,» co-author James Fowler, Ph.D., professor of political science and global public health at UC San Diego, told RealSimple.com.
Even the final act, which has already erroneously been
taken as a
social statement (I will only give generalizations),
debates a controversial issue but brings it squarely to the specifics of these characters and the situation in which they find themselves.
Our plan is grounded in the following two premises: 1) When purposefully synchronized with one another across multiple forms of media («cross-media»), children's and adolescents» exposure to high quality youth - oriented
social and ethical story content, i.e. stories of substance specifically about character development, compassion, and courage (CCC), is a powerful way to promote youth academic achievement and ethical values; 2) Especially if these stories, told and «read» across media, in their various genres (human interest, biography, history and historical fiction, civic engagement, coming of age,
social change, spiritual awakening, moral issues, etc.), are «taught» by «educators» (broadly defined) using an «evidence - based» pedagogy that A) makes use of peer to peer, and adult facilitated group discussion and
debate as a primary form of instruction, and B)
takes advantage of access to the texts of the story that are made available cross-media (narratives, scripts, videos, etc.) to foster students» critical thinking and ethical reflection skills.
Finally, I suggest that agency - related approaches can highlight how
social movements, individuals, and communities can and do
take significant steps to assist the substantive
debates and procedural avenues to democracy in authoritarian and post-authoritarian settings.
• How can schools prepare students to
take part in the political,
social, and ethical
debates already being stirred by technology - driven changes in the economy?
A multiracial fightback against the testing industrial complex — one that is explicitly ant - racist and
takes up issues of class inequality — has the potential to change the terms of the education reform
debate and envision a world where authentic assessments are used to support students as they engage in classroom inquiry about how to achieve
social justice.
In the Socratic Seminar, the teacher's main role is to facilitate a dialogue but not a
debate, through questioning thathelps students
take greater responsibility for their own thinking and talking.These discussions are used as the foundation for a variety of writing responses that enable students to reflect upon the dialogue, deepen their own thinking and clarify their own ideas.While often used in English Language Arts classrooms, Socratic Seminars can be used in
social studies, science even art and music classrooms.
In the long - running
debate about when to
take Social Security — as early as age 62 or as late as age 70 — the focus has been on timing your claim to get the most money, in total, out of the social safet
Social Security — as early as age 62 or as late as age 70 — the focus has been on timing your claim to get the most money, in total, out of the
social safet
social safety net.
Taking place from 29 — 31 March, Art Basel Hong Kong marks a week filled of non-stop art - gazing, cultural
debate and
social and satellite events galore.
Visitors to the Turner Prize will be able to
take photographs in the exhibition and are encouraged to share and
debate these through
social media.
A broad, responsible scientific and
social debate needs to
take place, one capable of considering all the available information and of calling things by their name.
If sceptics were
taken more seriously, if there was a
debate... if there was a political, or academic culture which accepted
debate... Cardiff wouldn't produce such rank pseudo-science, and
social scientists in Nottingham could be more confident about the definition of «space in the ecosystem of climate change discourse», but probably would chose his words — and his coordinates — more carefully.
Put another way it would
take a person with enormous
social power to reframe the entire
debate away from this governing equation.
This is one of the many conundrums of the climate change
debate — a
debate that has been
taken over by
social media and propaganda, while scientists struggle to get back into the game and engage the public.
Friends of the Earth worked with local and national groups including the Environmental Law and Policy Center, the Iowa Chapter of the Sierra Club, Green State Solutions, Iowa PIRG, Iowa Environmental Council, Iowa Farmers Union, Iowa Move to Amend, CREDO Action and Physicians for
Social Responsibility in the
debate about the cost recovery bill,
taking out radio and TV ads, phoning more than 100,000 Iowans, and mobilizing thousands of activists who called and wrote their elected officials.
Facebook Chief Information Officer Alex Stamos said in a blog post Tuesday that the content the
social media company
took down «included commentary on domestic and international political issues, the promotion of Russian culture and tourism as well as
debate on more everyday issues.»
«It is right at the centre of these
debates about our democracy, the impact of
social media on our lives and the need for these companies to step up and
take their responsibilities seriously.»
I attended a local group called «The Preston
Social» and
took part in discussions via Twitter, enabling me to build a positive reputation, as well as having my own opinions during
debates.