«Identification of Christian
social ethics with specific partisan proposals that clearly are not the only ones that may be characterized as Christian and as morally acceptable comes close to the original New Testament meaning of heresy.»
Even though orthodoxy actually contributed to unjust social structures by its neglect, it did contribute to a realistic
social ethic with its doctrine of sin.
Not exact matches
Social responsibility is key to the Molson MBA program,
with mandatory classes on business
ethics and managing strategic action.
Richard Leblanc, an expert on corporate governance and accountability, believes that the risk posed by
ethics and trust has increased because of the ease and speed
with which ethical breaches can be captured (eg on smartphones) and shared (via
social media).
You also need to work
with legal to establish or update your enterprise
social media policy and
ethics.
Although I frequently find myself at odds
with First Things over issues pertaining to economics and the role of government in public life, I usually find its critique of American
social mores and
ethics to be insightful and illuminating.
I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife
with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate
ethics from their respective religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (
social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).
A more explicit theologian,
with UU identification and salience, is James Luther Adams, who has focused on
social ethics and the religious role of voluntary associations.
What interests me about the family is not the obvious
social problems associated
with it in contemporary life; nor am I particularly interested in the
ethics of sexuality.
Some would reduce theological
ethics to good feelings coupled
with strategies for
social change.
The work
ethic is a deeply held
social value
with biblical roots.
That contemporary evangelical ideas of
social ethics are rooted in outside theological / ideological frameworks can perhaps be illustrated by comparing the four positions outlined above
with that of California politics over the last twenty years.
He tried to reconcile an «apparently» mutually exclusive absolute Christian
ethic (agape)
with a relative
social ethic (justice).
Just as Jesus rejected both the politics of the Sadducees and the revolutionary violence of the Zealots, so his followers must embody not
with their weapons but
with their lives a counter
social ethic.
The secular form of liberalism for Niebuhr was a philosophy and
social ethic which stemmed from a secularized Social Gospel combined with American optimism, faith in the techniques of natural science, and the idea of inevitable social pro
social ethic which stemmed from a secularized
Social Gospel combined with American optimism, faith in the techniques of natural science, and the idea of inevitable social pro
Social Gospel combined
with American optimism, faith in the techniques of natural science, and the idea of inevitable
social pro
social progress.
While Biblical hermeneutics provided the key to an understanding of the role of women in the church and family, dialogue between those whose traditions have heard the Word of God differently in other times and places held the key for the discussion of
social ethics, and engagement
with the full range of cultural activity (from psychotherapy to radical protest, from personal testimony to scientific statement) was the locus for theological evaluation concerning homosexuality.
«The
ethic of Jesus may offer valuable insights to and sources of criticism for a prudential
social ethic which deals
with present realities; but no such
social ethic can be directly derived from a pure religious
ethic.
The topics dealt
with in the preceding chapters — inspiration, women,
social ethics, and homosexuality — are important beyond their immediate purview.
The second questionable way in which minorities in the once mainline churches try to re-form the churches is by identifying true Christianity
with the adoption of what are perceived as radical positions on various contemporary issues of personal and
social ethics.
This may be her most high - profile project to date, but she's sticking
with the formula that has brought her this far: her unique ability to tell unforgettable stories that are laced
with powerful
social messages and an uncompromising work
ethic.
Here I side
with John Howard Yoder against the view prevalent among
social ethicists today that the early church found Jesus» sociopolitical
ethics, including his teaching on peace, irrelevant and was interested in his life, death, and resurrection only as the basis for justification by faith; that whatever
ethics the church taught was drawn from Hellenistic culture, particularly Stoicism.
Biblical scholars concerned
with the roles of men and women in biblical cultures point out that the love
ethic of the early church was so revolutionary in its day that it was considered a threat to
social order in the Roman Empire.
It aimed «to ground
social and economic
ethics on a Christian foundation, in direct accord
with the Protestant understanding.»
Education, «civilization,» even leisure, seem to Whitehead to be necessary» before either individuals or society can operate upon sufficiently general (i.e., non-selfish) criteria to make world consciousness a possibility.24 However, as we have already seen, world consciousness in Whitehead is the basis of
social ethics and in close affinity
with what he would want to designate as the fundamental religious impulse, the maximization of value.
Women who advocated nonviolence as the superior
social ethic for dealing
with conflict felt the need to defend themselves against the charge of antifeminism by the militants.
This essentially describes the
social gospel, a public
ethic concerned specifically
with justice and generosity.
By
social ethic I do not mean something opposed to a personal
ethic, but one which is concerned
with the issues between groups and nations where the decisions taken alter the lives of multitudes of people and the direction of history.
At the same time, there are religions, and some of them among the «higher» religions, which so emphasize the mystical, or it may be the ritual: aspect of religion (to use the imprecise but serviceable terms) that
social ethics seem hardly to count, On the other hand, there are systems of
ethics, and some of them very fine and idealistic systems, which either repudiate religion, or, like Confucianism, treat it
with a distant and somewhat ironical respect.
globalisation
with a human face, global citizenship, sustainable development, good governance, consensus - building, global
ethic, cultural diversity, cultural liberty, dialogue among civilizations, quality of life, quality education, education for all, right to choose, informed choice, informed consent, gender, equal opportunity, empowerment, NGOs, civil society, partnerships, transparency, bottom - up participation, accountability, holism, broad - based consultation, facilitation, inclusion, awareness - raising, clarification of values, capacity - building, women's rights, children's rights, reproductive rights, sexual orientation, safe abortion, safe motherhood, enabling environment, equal access, life skills education, peer education, bodily integrity, internalisation, ownership, bestpractices, indicators of progress, culturally sensitive approaches, secular spirituality, Youth Parliament, peace education, the rights of future generations, corporate
social responsibility, fair trade, human security, precautionary principle, prevention...
That would in itself be a definition hard to quarrel
with, were it not for the fact that in recent years it has come to be widely held that the final purpose of «doing»
social ethics is to draw up a blueprint for a just society and perhaps also a practical guide for getting there.
In the name of freedom of the individual, we sacrifice them to that caricature of Christianity that some people call «the Protestant
ethic,» an
ethic that finds no way of dealing directly and massively
with large - scale
social problems.
A Christian
social ethics should begin
with the premise that there can be no perfect community in this aeon, from which follows an enterprise of moral reflection that will be piecemeal, cautious, and open to revision.
We evolved as
social creatures and the use of
ethics and morality are what allowed us to cooperate
with each other.
It is worth repeating that economics, from the time of Plato through to Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill was as deeply concerned
with issues of
social justice,
ethics and morality as
with economic analysis itself However, economics students today are taught that Adam Smith was the «father of modern economics» but not that he was also a moral philosopher.
Nevertheless the Christian doctrine of the relation between the
ethics of Law and Grace, the Hindu concept of paramarthika and vyavaharika realms, the Islamic concept of shariat law versus the transcendent law, and the equivalent ones in secular ideologies like the Marxist idea of the present morality of class - war leading to the necessary love of the class-less society of the future need to be brought into the inter-faith dialogue to build up a common democratic political
ethic for maintaining order and freedom
with the continued struggle for
social justice, and also a common civil morality within which diverse peoples may renew their different traditions of civil codes.
Love is not realizable until the
social alienation of human beings in a class society is overcome and classless society emerges, for which, of course, the
ethics of power - politics of class - struggle
with its denials of love is to be followed.
The pietists of the seventeenth century became deeply concerned
with social ethics, founding the first orphanages in Europe and starting the first missionary enterprises.
Love is not realizable until the
social alienation of human beings in class - society is overcome and classless society emerges, for which of course the
ethics of power - politics of class - struggle
with its denials of love is to be followed.
Instead of discussing each point raised in detail, we shall deal
with the authority of the Bible in
social ethics by emphasizing two points.
This
social ethic operates
with a sense of a new humanity and moves towards the goal of genuine
social pluralism.
The last half of the book deals
with the major contemporary problems of
social ethics and attempts to turn the searchlight of the Christian gospel upon them.
As we examine the
social strand of
ethics, we must still keep before us the picture of embodied selfliood
with its drives, needs, and capacities (STE).
These theses of the socially powerless Jesus, the compromise of the gospel
ethic with world and other systems of thought, the centrality of the love commandments, the need for a viable
social ethic utilizing
social philosophies, and the understanding by all this in relationship to the history of
social philosophies had a forceful impact upon both H. Richard Niebuhr and his older brother Reinhold Niebuhr.
American Catholic history may not be so booming a discipline as biblical studies or medical
ethics, but even the most cursory survey of the American Catholic Studies Newsletter (published by the Cushwa Center for the study of American Catholicism at the University of Notre Dame, itself an institutional expression of the growth of the field) reveals an extraordinary breadth of research, ranging from classic institutional histories and biographies of key figures to the new
social history,
with its emphases on patterns of community, spirituality, family life, and education.
She is concerned to imbue it
with an
ethic of
social responsibility.
«Labor Day is a day we celebrate the great American work
ethic and those hardworking men and women who struggled to provide us
with workers» rights and deliver us today's landmarks of middle class security, including the 40 - hour work week, child labor laws, pensions, a minimum wage,
Social Security and Medicare.
The company,
with offices in HongKong and Dubai, specialises in financial engineering and projects geared towards socio - economic transformation,
with a principled work
ethic guided by environmental stewardship, cultural diversity and
social responsibility.
The widespread thesis of
social Darwinism, promoted at the end of the 19th century was that evolutionary explanations were at odds
with the development of
ethics.
Mats Hansson is the director of the Centre for Research
Ethics & Bioethics at the University of Uppsala and has conducted extensive research in biomedical
ethics as principal investigator in multi-disciplinary research projects dealing
with issues ranging from ethical,
social and legal aspects of the implementation of genetic diagnosis in clinical practice and the use of human tissue materials in research, to clinical and medical
ethics.
Other interests include
social media and medical professionalism, as well as
ethics in global health (
with special emphasis on short - term global health training).