Together, these works tell a powerful story of myriad
social ills affecting the US from the Nixon years to the turn of the century, and offer inspiration to a contemporary generation of artists looking to make new lines of inquiry.
Will it be a true exposé of
the social ills affecting the community concerned, or just a rambling lamentation of how the world could be better?
Not exact matches
The Law is a means of coping with the
affects / symptoms of our broken relationship with God [broken on the human, not the Divine side] and not the cure of mankind's individual and
social ills.
My supposition is that the individualization of sin is the trivialization of sin, and given the systematic connection between our understanding of sin and our understanding of God as the one who addresses us in our human plight, the trivialization of sin has an inexorable
affect upon two areas: the doctrine of God, and the sense of individual and corporate responsibility for
social ills.
Short of solving the many
social ills that
affect learning, what does make a difference is:
On one side, there are people like New York University professor / former Deputy U.S. Education Secretary Diane Ravitch who argue that larger
social ills such as poverty, joblessness, economic despair and lack of health coverage negatively
affect educational achievement, and that until those problems are addressed, schools will never be able to produce the results we want.
Converging lines of evidence from neuroscience, molecular biology, genetics, and the
social sciences tell us that early experiences are literally built into our brains and bodies to
affect a lifetime of learning and health, for good or for
ill.