Not exact matches
Whitehead concludes that «for the purpose of understanding
social institutions, this crude threefold division of human nature is
required:
Instinct, Intelligence, Wisdom» (AI 59).
«the freedom to engage in productive work — even where that is not
required in order to survive — is indeed an important component of human dignity,... for mankind is pre-eminently a
social species with an
instinct for meaningful association.
Is this transposition of
social life into the intellectual sphere much different from the jury system — with its implicit belief that jurors»
social instincts are their best guidelines as to what the law
requires them to conclude?