More specifically, I should say that I approach this question from
a social liberal perspective.
Generally however their pamphlets are either dull or on the odd occasion somewhat objectionable, at least from
a Social Liberal perspective.
Not exact matches
Our
liberal,
social - scientific
perspective has made it axiomatic: trace down the empirical roots of human attitudes and actions, and you will understand them, and «to understand all is to forgive all.»
The magazines move from the strongly traditional viewpoint of Moody Monthly (a viewpoint carrying on the
social ethic of late nineteenth century American revivalism), through the moderately conservative stance of Christianity Today (a stance that seeks perhaps unconsciously to revive the
social activism of American fundamentalism prior to the repeal of Prohibition and the Scopes trail), to the socially
liberal commitment of The Reformed Journal (a position seeking to be contemporary, and yet faithful to Calvin's thought) and the socially radical
perspective of Sojourners (a
perspective molded in the Anabaptist tradition).
On the contrary, it is eminently a
liberal and liberalising study, since it shows us how to relate our own contemporary
social experience to the wider
perspectives of universal history.
Although the emphasis on biblical languages declined, and the new sciences, including the
social sciences, were given large place, these colleges resisted practical training in favor of
liberal arts, understood in a humanistic, Christian
perspective.
But a body of newer work on the apostle — including, perhaps, as Hurtado notes, Wright's own new books (which I haven't had the chance to finish reading yet)-- reveals that Paul may, after all, look less like a
liberal Westerner than the New
Perspective has taught us to think and more like a Christ - haunted figure whose radical
social practices arose directly from his pioneering, innovative thinking about the identity and achievement of Jesus Christ.
In the end it comes down to a difference between a
liberal perspective which wants to empower without being too judgmental about specific goods, and a more traditional
social democratic approach which thinks in terms of access to specific «merit goods».
The Autumn 2010 edition of Renewal — a journal of
social democracy — sees the Chair of the Social Liberal Forum David Hall - Matthews writing about the formation of the Coalition government from a Lib Dem perspe
social democracy — sees the Chair of the
Social Liberal Forum David Hall - Matthews writing about the formation of the Coalition government from a Lib Dem perspe
Social Liberal Forum David Hall - Matthews writing about the formation of the Coalition government from a Lib Dem
perspective.
These included: the need to examine the best ways to tackle anti-
social behaviour; putting industrial democracy back at the forefront of our economic policies; giving a higher profile to fuel poverty; the need to spend more on
social housing; and a desire to talk about policy to those with similar
perspectives from outside the
Liberal Democrats.
One, he thinks that
social justice exists outside the jurisdiction of school curricula, and second that those who would teach
social justice approach it only from a
liberal perspective.
David Nylund's paper writes that most cultural diversity classes in
social work are taught from a
liberal or conservative multicultural
perspective that precludes a power analysis and a critical discussion of whiteness.