My own denomination, the United Methodist, came into existence in the eighteenth century, helped to bring the gospel to the frontier in this country, took the gospel around the world, and devoted itself at home and abroad to realizing
the social meaning of that gospel.
Not exact matches
In fact, we may rightly claim that the preaching
of the
gospel and the administration
of the sacraments must necessarily go together; to put it in language used by Professor Whitehead in Religion in the Making, the «cult» (by which Whitehead
meant the
social action
of worship) and the «myth» (by which he
meant the story which explains a society's worship) can never be separated.
Preparation for preaching, therefore, should include time spent studying the human and
social implications
of their pastoral and community relationships; reading papers and magazines; listening to radio; watching television; attending the theater and movies in order that the church's preaching may engage the
meanings that influence people with the
meanings of the
gospel.
Worse still — and more to the point
of my concern — the translation
of the one Word
of God into direct
social and political terms has
meant that the churches neglect the message for which they do have sole responsibility, that which constitutes their specific raison d'etre, and which no other agency in the world is called on or is competent to proclaim: the
gospel of Holy Scripture which has the power to make people wise unto salvation through faith in Christ Jesus (2 Timothy 3:15).
If one
means, for instance, an epistemological privilege
of the oppressed, in the sense that the poor, the suffering and the dispossessed have some intuitive knowledge
of God, righteousness and
social reality not available to others; if one means that victims know best how to overcome their condition and build new institutions; and if one means that knowledge based on «experience» makes academic excellence unnecessary, then liberation thought and the Social Gospel di
social reality not available to others; if one
means that victims know best how to overcome their condition and build new institutions; and if one
means that knowledge based on «experience» makes academic excellence unnecessary, then liberation thought and the
Social Gospel di
Social Gospel diverge.
If by «liberation» people
mean that Christian thought and life are to be socially engaged, committed to those forms
of systemic change necessary for the greater actualization
of social justice, and open to the dynamic movements of the Spirit among the people, then there is little doubt: the Social Gospel is America's indigenous form of liberation the
social justice, and open to the dynamic movements
of the Spirit among the people, then there is little doubt: the
Social Gospel is America's indigenous form of liberation the
Social Gospel is America's indigenous form
of liberation theology.
The alleged subordination
of the
gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected biblical texts that are always given a political
meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds
of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom
of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the
gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on
social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting
of the reality
of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay
of action and reflection) as the only criterion
of faith, so that the notion
of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
By the end
of the Assembly, as Kenneth Slack pointed out, «most
of the members felt that there was more danger from undue stress on the evangelism
of individuals than the other way round, despite widely expressed anxiety, given expression by Stott, that liberation in political,
social and economic sense was in danger
of replacing salvation from sin at the heart
of the redeeming
gospel».73 There was no doubt that, despite the narrowing
of the range
of disagreements, important differences continued, especially with regard to the
meaning of salvation and the program
of dialogue with people
of other faiths.
In 1975 there appeared in Germany a book entitled: The Berlin Ecumenical Manifesto, on the Utopian Vision
of the World Council
of Churches, edited by Walter Kunneth and Peter Beyerhaus.34 The book attacked not only the World Council
of Churches but also the Lutheran World Federation, World Student Christian Federation, certain Roman Catholic groups, the German Evangelical Kirchentag, Taize, and to some extent even Lausanne.35 According to H. Berkof, the common thread through all the articles in the book was the desire to demonstrate that the World Council
of Churches no longer sought to proclaim the
Gospel throughout the world, but strove rather for a purely horizontal,
social and political, humanization and unification
of mankind by
means of religious pluralism and syncretism.
Good works /
Social Justice
mean nothing without the boldness
of spreading the
gospel.
It
means that persons must witness to the
gospel in a way that will make it relevant to the business, family, and
social life
of our day.
On the one hand, the
social groups appear to be idolatrous in a sense that few
of the individuals in them are; on the other hand, the idolatry
of the great groups seems to arise out
of that despair
of God and the
meaning of life for which the
Gospel supplies the cure.
If by
social gospel they
mean the notion that mankind will eventually evolve out
of evil and create a utopian society all on its own — then certainly not!
If by
social gospel they
mean the good news that God loves the world and intends to redeem it, that God is building a new kingdom in our midst under the authority
of Jesus Christ, and that we show our allegiance to this kingdom whenever we love our enemies, serve the poor, turn the other cheek, pursue holiness, preach the
gospel, and care for the least
of these — then yes, I suppose I have.