In governance we strive to apply Rudolf Steiner's concept of the threefold
social organism which meets the different qualities and requirements of the economic, legal, and cultural spheres.
And as the dying process of an organism can stretch over some time, so the demise of
a social organism which has enjoyed a life span of some 1,500 years may be a lengthy process.
Once the exceptional, but fundamentally biological, nature of the collective human complex is accepted, nothing prevents us (provided we take into account the modifications which have occurred in the dimensions in which we are working) from treating as authentic organs the diverse
social organisms which have gradually evolved in the course of the history of the human race.
Not exact matches
The school of
social functionalism examines the ways in
which society, considered as an
organism, attempts to contain and manage conflict, integrating disparate members and subgroups into the whole.
The purpose of the self - system is to maximize the potential for well being and minimize the presence of tension or anxiety within the
organism,
which arises from either organic needs or
social insecurity.
Read loses sight of Buber's concept of dialogue, however, when he suggests that Buber's teaching shows how to replace the inter-individual tensions of the classroom by «an organic mode of adaptation to the
social organism as a whole» and when he reinterprets the teacher's concentration of an effective world as a selective screen in
which what is kept in and what is left out is determined by the organic
social pattern through the medium of the teacher's «sense of a total
organism's feeling - behaviour.»
The building block electronic and protonic actual occasions are, in the case of human beings, swept into vastly more complex, Chinese box - like sets of containing societies within
which there are
social levels that can be identified with cells, others
which answer to Aristotle's levels of tissues and organs, and
which finally are presided over by what Whitehead refers to as the regnant nexus, a
social thread of complex temporal inheritance
which, Whitehead suggests, wanders from part to part of the brain, is the seat of conscious direction of the
organism as a whole, and answers to what in Plato and Aristotle is called the soul.
Some humans romantically yearn for a regression back to
social anarchy,
which might be likened — rather fancifully, to be sure — to the cells of a plant longing for the mobility of single - celled
organisms.
Within this
social organism there would arise «a spiritual center, a supreme pole of consciousness, upon
which all the separate consciousnesses of the world may converge and within
which they may love one another».5 This super-consciousness would evolve in the same way that personal consciousness does within the complex physiology of the human
organism.
«What we have described as globalization is remarkably close to Teilhard de Chardin's planetization, in
which «[mankind, born on this planet and spread over its entire surface, come [s] gradually to form round its earthly matrix, a single, major, organic unity, enclosed upon itself.4 Thus the globalization of humankind could lead to the formation of a new kind of living entity — a
social organism — on the same cosmic principle as that by
which atoms join to form molecules, molecules join to form mega-molecules, mega-molecules unite to form living cells, and innumerable cells constitute an
organism.
Which amounts to saying that the complexification of Matter, at the point it has now reached in the human
social organism, is physically incapable of advancing further if the Mind does not play a part, not only with its capacity for technical organization, but with its purposive and affective powers of arrangement and inner tension.
But the decisive stages of this evolution are just those in
which, beyond a new and purely «
social» organization, there emerges the constitution of
organisms that, on a higher level from that of the unities they have integrated, can again count as true unitary beings.
A family is a primary
social organism with a distinctive identity or «personality» of its own,
which is more than the sum of its parts.
The Church is neither an Epi - nor a Para-phenomenon in the growth of the Human
Social Organism, but constitutes the very Axis (or Nucleus) about
which it Forms
The higher
organisms which most interest us thus can be analyzed into complexly - related levels of
social order.
«DNA methylation is potentially a way through
which social dominance is regulated in many
social organisms, including people,» Fernald said.
The phrase is a fine combination of old - fashioned sexism and convenient biology - speak
which, by reducing human individuals to a biological
organism, «man», sweeps away
social complexities and confines debate to the simplicities of what we often call «nature».
For instance, in the case of the animal level containing bi-dimensional or even single dimensional
organisms, the
social level,
which is the level of animal coexistence, can only feed on the energy coming from their physical or physical - emotional level of interactions.