Not exact matches
The housing bubble in the United States, which triggered the financial crisis in 2008, had highlighted the danger of using the financial system to make up for the
failures in
social policies.
If egalitarian
social policy follows any one guiding «moral» principle, it is to justify government intervention to overcome «market
failure.»
And the Tory leader will point to the torture of two young boys as an extreme symptom of what he dubs Labour's «moral
failure» as he launches a raft of
social policies.»
It is our
failures in
social policy, to provide council housing, to protect workers» (and trade union) rights, and to do enough to combat low pay and job insecurity that are the root cause of public concern about immigration.
But no amount of back - door
social engineering, tinkering with university admissions
policies or dumbing - down of exam standards will redress the fundamental
failure of the present one - size - fits - all, education system.
According to the AFT report, Passing on
Failure: District Promotion
Policies and Practices, the practice of
social promotion contributes to the very problems that can make it seem necessary.
We can put an end to our edu - masochism: If researchers spend more effort on assessing our own states» successes and
failures in improving student performance and less on trying to draw lessons from countries with very different
social and educational contexts, they are sure to spark a much more productive national educational
policy debate than we have had in the past decade.
Across the country, state
policy - makers, school districts, major foundations, community — based organizations, and
social entrepreneurs are implementing promising initiatives designed to arrest the cycle of school
failure before it starts and ensure children read well by third grade.
The model explores short - term scenarios of
policy decisions by simulating
social - economical - environmental systems, including the impact of climate - induced drought on crop
failures and food prices.
From the point of view of a criminologist (read:
social scientist), the McMorrow case exposes some ironic
failures of our national sentencing
policies.
The chapter suggests that
failure to co-ordinate the goals of native title negotiations with these broader
policies aimed at addressing the economic and
social development of Indigenous people, not only limits the native title process; it also limits the capacity of the broader Indigenous
policy to achieve its objectives.
Nonetheless, the results have profound treatment and
social policy implications, because
failures within the child protective services system too often result in recurrent episodes of abuse, frequent changes in children's out - of - home placements, and an absence of positive
social supports in the lives of maltreated children.
The
failure of the Commonwealth to direct the negotiation of native title agreements towards the economic,
social and cultural development of the group puts native title
policy development at odds with the Commonwealth's broader Indigenous
policy direction.
While there is a
failure by many States to fully develop
policy objectives for native title negotiations, this
policy gap could be filled if States were willing to align native title negotiations with the economic and
social development objectives contained in their broader Indigenous
policies.
The
failure to co-ordinate the goals of native title negotiations with the State's strategies to address the economic and
social development of Indigenous people not only limits the native title process; it also limits the capacity of the broader
policy to achieve its objectives.
The
failure in Australia to perceive native title and land rights as the basis on which to address Indigenous economic and
social development has been evident at legal,
policy and administrative levels.
The
failure to co-ordinate the goals of native title negotiations with the State's strategies to address the economic and
social development of Indigenous people not only isolates the native title process from these broader
policy objectives; it limits the capacity of the broader
policy to achieve its objectives.
The
failure to co-ordinate the goals of native title negotiations with the State's strategies to address the economic and
social development of Indigenous people generally not only isolates the native title process from broader
policy objectives; it limits the capacity of those broader
policies to achieve their objective of addressing the economic and
social conditions of Indigenous people's lives.
While there is a
failure by many governments to fully develop
policy objectives for native title negotiations, this
policy gap could be filled if they were willing to align native title negotiations with the economic and
social development objectives contained in their broader Indigenous
policies.
The
failure to co-ordinate the goals of native title negotiations with the State's strategies to address the economic and
social development of Indigenous people not only isolates the native title process from broader
policy objectives; it limits the capacity of those broader
policies to achieve their objective of addressing the economic and
social conditions of Indigenous people's lives.