To put it bluntly, the notion of consent is arguably meaningless by itself as the arbiter of legitimate sexual and marital relationships because of the potential for manipulation, coercion, and abuse in a situation where there are deep - rooted and unequal
social power relations (e.g., the President of the United States [not] having sexual relations with a besotted young intern or, as here, a parent and an adult child contracting a marriage).
Not exact matches
This is at the point of the concrete
social meaning of the cross in its
relation to enmity and
power.
This can not possibly be wholly coerced by any one term of the
social relation, hence not even by the maximal «possible»
power.
Drawing on the existential theology and
social philosophy of Martin Buber, I wrote in my thesis that God is our «
power in
relation» and that justice, the actualization of love among us, is the making of right, or mutual,
relation.
The history of the church is marked by interminable hours of silence, while the clamour of the persecuted, the imprisoned and marginalised was silenced, and the churches preferred to stick to the conventions, maintain good
relations with the
powers, not lose their
social standing.
Literature itself (no less than religion) is, in this view, an ideology, with the most intimate
relations to
social power.
While these latter are important, we must probe more deeply for environment, functions, and context, and, most important of all, for human
relation that define
social roles and tell us who has
power, who is aggressor, and who is victim.
Instead, we deal with individual sins that either remain in the private realm, or if projected into the wider
social realm fail to deal with the collective
power of sin and its
relation to individuals.
On the contrary, love as a principle of
social ethics implies that distribution and organization of
power which can offer the foundation for free and constructive human
relations.
This sphere of freedom is threatened and secretly determined by anonymous
powers determining public opinion without being controlled themselves, which produce mass psychoses, direct consumption and the ever more intricate
relations of
social life.
The importance of the
power problem for Christian ethics derives both from the fact that
power, whether economic, political, military, or spiritual, means capacity to determine life for good or ill, and from the fact that some fundamental redistribution of
power is necessary as a condition of the freedom and dignity of men in their
social relations.
The reality of
power is complex; and its use and misuse in all human,
social and political
relations and interactions has been a question of utmost importance for all peoples.
This violent process is permeating the
relations among international and political
powers,
social classes and cultural groups, national and ethic groups, and caste and religious communities, making it making it very hard to bring about peaceful resolution of conflicts and disputes among the struggling parties, and eroding the foundations of peaceful life.
But if, on the other hand, we refuse to regard human socialization as anything more than a chance arrangement, a modus vivendi lacking all
power of internal growth, then (excepting, at the most, a few elementary rules safeguarding the living - space of the individual) we find the whole structure of politico - economico -
social relations reduced to an arbitrary system of conventional and temporary expedients.
But the other elements of community organizing would come together again and again: the foot - slogging, one - on - one recruitment effort to form an organization of organizations, the struggle to get past ethnic differences, the taking of the public stage, the sequence of conflict - organization -
power as the route to negotiation, and the critical relationship to other
social movements — which became a guarded
relation to the civil rights movement.
In addition, regional planning would allow the coordinated development of natural resources, water
power, agriculture, and industry, in
relation to
social and economic factors; for example, a TVA - type program has been proposed for the Middle East.
Modernity is represented by three forces - first, the revolution in the
relation of humanity to nature, signified by science and technology; second, the revolutionary changes in the concept of justice in the
social relations between fellow human beings indicated by the self - awakening of all oppressed and suppressed humans to their fundamental human rights of personhood and peoplehood, especially to the values of liberty and equality of participation in
power and society; thirdly, the break - up of the traditional integration of state and society with religion, in response to religious pluralism on the one hand and the affirmation of the autonomy of the secular realm from the control of religion on the other».
But — and this is a huge qualifier — if that message of justification by God's undeserved love is preached apart from an unmasking of the actual
power relations which have aggravated these feelings to the level of a
social neurosis; if people are released from the rat race of upward mobility only privatistically, with no critique of the economic and
social ideology that stimulates such desperate cravings; if people are liberated from a bad sense of themselves without any sense of mission to change the conditions that waste human beings in such a way, then justification by faith becomes a mystification of the actual
power relations, and the Christian gospel is indeed the opiate of the masses.
That is to say, all realistic
social morality requires keeping the
relation between
power, law and love in tension, till the sources of human self - alienation are overcome and loving
relation which has spontaneity as its character is possible.
It is interesting how clearly the prophets saw the
relation to each other of
power, pride, and injustice; and how unfailingly they combined their strictures against the religious sin of pride and the
social sin of injustice.
Use and misuse of the
power in all human,
social and political
relations and interactions has been the question of utmost importance.
It is equally evident that the treatment of these topics could not proceed without some critical scrutiny both of the
social facts and of the past and present behavior of the church in
relation to those facts as well as of the secular
powers in
relation to the church.
It is easy, of course, once a conceptual dualism of this kind has been established, to argue that culture can not be understood sociologically unless it is «explained» in terms of
social structure — unless the «sources» or «causes» of religious beliefs are located within such obdurate features of the
social world as class interests,
power relations,
social networks, family backgrounds, and the like.
This ontological turn has opened up space for new ways of thinking about democracy, but in my view it has some troubling entailments too — it culminates in the effective detachment of political dynamics from
social relations of
power and results in the unvindicated privileging of the former over the latter.
Social democrats seem happy to accept inequalities of
power in
relation to citizen and state, to the extent to which they believe they are necessary to provide welfare services.
But now, there appears to be a new emerging thinking on the left that is now beginning to challenge inequalities of
power in
relation to the citizen and welfare state, which were once believed to be inevitable by
social democrats.
In view of this ubiquity of the struggle for
power in all
social relations and on all levels of
social organization, is it surprising that nation state politics is of necessity
power politics»
The medical establishment has effected a political rather than a scientific closure on the debate, which reflects the extent to which the production, distribution and reception of medical knowledge and, indeed, scientific knowledge in general, are inextricably linked to
power, both within the medical profession itself and in its
relations with other
social and economic groups.
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers National Academy of Engineering NAS, Government - University - Industry Research Roundtable NAS, Committee on International
Relations NAS, Committee on Scholarly Communication with the People's Republic of China NAS, Committee on Science and Public Policy (COSPUP) National Academy of Science, National Research Council National Association of State Universities and Land - Grant Colleges (NASULGC) National Commission on Libraries and Information Science National Conference on the Advancement of Research (NCAR), Les Cook National Council of University Research Administrators National Engineering Action Council (NEAC) National Science Teachers Association National Society of Professional Engineers Science and Technology Political Action Committee Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society of North America, 1977 - 1979 Sigma Xi Parapsychological Association Phi Theta Kappa
Power Engineering Society
Social Science Research Council Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Society for Applied International Development State Academies of Science Union of Concerned Scientists United Community Centers, Brooklyn, New York
In the Psychology Department at Princeton University, our research examines issues of
social power and intergroup
relations.
It had not occurred to me that such a exploration of the «integral society» was important — or even significant — or that it was necessary to fathom the means and ways that I was situated in the larger
social order, immersed in an internally differentiated yet dialectically unified nation state called Canada, living in the fringes of a civil society consisting of an ensemble of practices and
relations of
power dialectically interpellated by and integrated within the state.
For example, if I believe that human societies are inherently amoral, unjust, and governed by powerful elites who rig the economic, political, and educational game in their favor, then I might endorse the late Brazilian
social activist Paulo Freire's «pedagogy of the oppressed,» wherein students are taught to view
social relations in terms of
power and domination.
HG: What this questions registers is how do
power, politics and knowledge connect in creating the conditions for the production of knowledge, values, subjectivities, and
social relations in both the school and the classroom.
Attendees will learn how to harness the
power of digital tools and
social media accessible today to improve communications, enhance public
relations, establish a brand presence, increase student engagement, discover opportunity, and grow professionally like never before.
Giroux caricatures the traditional classroom as one where «students sit in rows staring at the back of each others» heads and at the teacher who faces them in symbolic, authoritarian fashion»; «events are governed by a rigid time schedule imposed by a system of bells and reinforced by cues from teachers»; we «glorify the teacher as the expert [and] dispenser of knowledge»; «
social relationships... are based upon
power relations inextricably linked to the teacher's allotment of grades»; and tracking «alienates students from schooling.»
After providing the political and cultural contexts for the rise of the testing accountability movement in the 1960s that culminated almost forty years later in No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top, this book then moves on to provide a policy history and
social policy analysis of value - added testing in Tennessee that is framed around questions of
power relations, winners, and losers.
Themes include coming - of - age, Third World development,
social class, and
power relations.
«Controlled Fantasy» asks questions by wandering between rituals,
social dress codes,
power relations, borderline experiences and popular culture issues.
Her internationally produced and exhibited work typically involves interactions with a group or community that result in performances, films, videos, audio recordings and books, and involve sometimes provocative reflections of
social, political, institutional and aesthetic
power relations.
Join us for all or part of a one day symposium inviting leading affect theorists from a variety of fields to comment on the problems of affect and the future of the humanities as institutions question
power, creativity and
social relations.
Isabelle Grobler explores absurdities inherent in the manifestation of
power and authority in
social and economic
relations.
By utilizing methods of antagonism and instigation, they examine the terrain of specific cultural,
social and political situations, as well as
power relations between the artists, their subjects, and viewers.
Their work address issues of collective identity and
relations of
power in
social structures focusing on the absorption of underground tactics of resistance.
Performance as conceptual art also features heavily in this exhibition with a particular focus on the investigation of
social relations of
power, gender, stereotype and history.
His works span across different media, including performance, installation and video, and «unveil upside - down and sometimes absurd situations from specific
social contexts, questioning the contradictions and
power relations in today's society.»
Her practice investigates
power relations, popular culture and gender politics, juxtaposing the rhythmic structuring of sound as a tactile material within the
social construction of esoteric ideology.
The exhibition continues Wallace's exploration of how
power shapes our knowledge of the body and
social relations.
It's far more complicated than that, and it has to do with the kindness and cruelties of
social relations combined with the
power and rigor of our work.
A Los Angeles based artist who grew up in the city's South Central neighborhood, Villalobos combines references of high and low culture to interrogate issues of American
social structures,
power relations, capitalism, and identity.
Within this, autobiography functions as a point of departure for thinking through the patriarchal
power structures underpinning both the visual experiences and
social relations performed by Papadopoulos» characters.