Not exact matches
There is no area in
social science in
which the
evidence stacks up so completely on one side: marriage and traditional family life are associated with good outcomes in terms of health, wealth, and other indicators of well - being.
The «soft»
social sciences,
which includes spirituality as well as psychology and sociology, rely on the statistical
evidence that has been tested in the crucible of human experience.
Today, the movement has realized that
science is much more likely to reach an audience
which is increasingly looking for demonstrable
evidence from
which to base their position on
social issues.
In my opinion what has happened in this area is that a kind of
social ideology is now embedded within the medical paradigm, to the extent that that
social judgments are masquerading as scientific judgments making the
science a pseudo
science, as a relatively small number of people have been placed in a position wherein they can choose what relevant lines of
evidence (and what counter arguments) are acceptable and
which are not, as deemed by themselves.
And we believe, based on strong
social science evidence, that SEL has particular power to unlock a broad range of human capacities — intellectual and emotional —
which prepare children to co-create a kinder, more interconnected, and equitable future.
With so much
evidence, it's difficult to understand why the cause for teacher rights and professionalism has to go to the U.S. Supreme Court for the public to recognize that labor unions
which create and defend laws that treat all teachers the same are at odds with sound
social science and what it takes to effectively teach kids.
I was at a dinner a couple weeks back at
which several journalists spoke on just this issue, and Shankar Vedantam and Chris Mooney made a good case for what I have also suggested (including in my reply to you on April 6); What's really irrational is for smart people, in support of the myth of perfect rationality and frustrated by the public's «ignorance» about risk, to ignore the mountains of
evidence from neuroscience and
social sciences about how human perception and decision - making actually works, about risk or anything else.
Dr. Green was the one who said that she had counted many
social science papers as mitigation (
which was counted as scientific
evidence of endorsement of AGW.)
«I was irked by the persistent use of wishy - washy terminology such as «likely» and «very likely» that was totally uncalled for... Such «
social sciences» terminology might be allowable if there was no other available
evidence for global warming except for the statistical analysis of a relatively short global temperature time - series (on
which there is superimposed a substantial natural variability component).
In Bedford and Carter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, [2015] 1 SCR 331,
which dealt with the constitutionality of the provisions of the Criminal Code relative to prostitution and assisted suicide respectively, the
evidence that was held to allow lower courts to revisit Supreme Court precedent came mostly from the
social sciences.
Law, like all other
social sciences and the humanities is driven to change by changing technology — particularly procedural law, of
which the law of
evidence is a major subdivision.
And we believe, based on strong
social science evidence, that SEL has particular power to unlock a broad range of human capacities — intellectual and emotional —
which prepare children to co-create a kinder, more interconnected, and equitable future.