In this way, from
the social sciences point of view, quantitative research refers to the systematic empirical consideration of quantitative properties, phenomena and their relationships.
When you are writing a quantitative research paper, you should open up its meaning from
the social sciences point of view.
I stressed the importance of understanding
social science pointing to powerful forces that predispose how people absorb the same information.
When they do splurge, it is more likely to be on an activity rather than on a possession — not surprising, since
social science points out that possessions often disappoint over time, while experiences, such as sports or vacations, appreciate in value in our memories.
Not exact matches
But with broad and efficiently concentrated giving, you reach (if you'll forgive another
social science buzzphrase) a tipping
point at which your reputation as a giver and your accumulation of grateful pals grows to the
point that positive effects ensue.
Even atheists who have an understanding of the
social sciences are
pointing out the problems with this study.
First, Farley
points to the primacy of the situation, interpreted, to be sure, both from the perspective of faith and from the perspective of the relevant
social science disciplines.
This particularity of our starting
point has been highlighted by the
social and historical
sciences.
The subjective emphasis on reality construction and personal meaning has
pointed toward inner moods and motivations — phenomena that elude the usual methods of documentation and verification in the
social sciences.
His books, most notably including The Tipping
Point, focus on unexpected findings in
social science and not only make them accessible for the average reader, but also weave them skilfully into patterns and rules.
Under the onslaught of the physical
sciences, the life
sciences, the
social sciences, and the philosophical thought processes that accompanied them, the religious arena shrank to such a
point that the church began to be perceived as no longer a significant influence at all, but rather as a minor institution that could safely be tolerated or ignored.
As Clifford Geertz has
pointed out, the contemporary skeptical and revisionist spirit is «determined to examine
science as through and through a
social and cultural phenomenon.»
These considerations
point, of course, to the relevance of work in the
social sciences that has sought to problematize the modern concept of individuality.
In her paper, Contextualizing online human milk sharing: Structural factors and lactation disparity among middle income women in the U.S for the journal
Social Science & Medicine, Palmquist
points out that women involved in online milk - sharing are largely middle class.
Jonathan D. Moreno, a professor of medical ethics and health policy and of the history and sociology of
science and philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania,
pointed to the
social and ethical implications such technologies introduce.
The
social media site's news - filtering program shuts out some opposing
points of view, but not as much as its users do on their own, researchers report online May 7 in
Science.
The Scientific American blog network supports Scientific American's mission by providing insightful
points of view and encouraging community discussion on the advancement of
science and technology and its relationship with issues of major
social relevance.
Montillo uses the classic novel Frankenstein as her starting
point to explore the shady
science and changing
social mores that inspired Mary Shelley's 1818 tale, and folds details of Shelley's personal life into a broader history of early anatomists and alchemists.
Silver
points to Coburn's criticism of several NSF awards in the
social sciences as a prime example.
Rodrigo Guerrero Velasco conducted his
social science research from an unusual vantage
point: city hall.
If you are looking for sites that provide educational resources in language arts,
science,
social studies, math, or physical education, this site is a good starting
point.
I measure student achievement with a composite of grade -
point average (GPA) based on student self - reports of their most recent grades in English, math, history /
social studies, and
science.
For the lottery analysis, the grade reductions are even more dramatic, with drops of 7
points in math, 8 in
science, and 4 in
social studies.
As my friend Dan Kadlec
pointed out in a recent story with Time, Arne Duncan just said, «As important as reading and math and
social studies and
science are, I think today more than ever financial literacy has to be part of that.
A second important outcome was that the lower - performing students, so these were students who were about the bottom third of our sample, these were students who were earning Grade
Point Averages (GPAs) of a C or below in the semester prior to the intervention [and were] most likely going to be struggling in school; for these students, the intervention increased their GPAs and also increased their likelihood of passing core courses like Math, English,
Social Studies and
Science - and increased that by around 6.5 percentage
points.
The CTBA report ignores entirely previous research from the Brookings Institution, a random - assignment study — the gold standard of
social science research — that found voucher students in Milwaukee scored six Normal Curve Equivalent
points higher than the control group in reading and 11
points higher in math.
Schrag's weakest
point is his grasp of
social -
science methodology.
However, it loses
points in the area of assessments because it lacks tests aligned to state standards at the elementary and middle school levels in
science and
social studies.
The FSAA measures student academic performance on the Access
Points (FS — AP) in Language Arts, Mathematics,
Science, and
Social Studies.
I'd like to respond your
point - «Common Core English language arts encourages the inclusion of
social studies and, as the article noted, includes standards for teaching it and
science.»
This designation comes as a result of strong math gains in all grades tested, with jumps as high as nine percentage
points; gains in English III,
social studies and
science; and continued growth among all student subgroups.
the process of using the local community and environment as a starting
point to teach concepts in language arts, mathematics,
social studies,
science and other subjects across the curriculum.
SB 1458 encourages giving more weight to
social science and
science tests in response to the widely shared criticism that a math - and English - heavy
point system had discouraged K - 8 teachers from making time for other subjects.
Separate base scores are calculated for each content area — English, mathematics,
science, and history /
social science — using the following formula: (Following the calculation of the weighted index, additional index
points are awarded as indicated in the next section.)
If you are at the beginning of your thesis, but are simply unable to come up with a suitable topic and starting
point, we can provide you with a range of
social science dissertation ideas or example material.
Munger's friend, the investor Li Liu,
points out that «when you have a difficult problem in
social science, a good way to solve it is to invert it.
However, it is also important to
point out that standards of statistical proof in investment, economics, and other
social sciences research papers almost invariably require a 5 % (a 1 in 20 chance) or even 1 % (a 1 in 100 chance) confidence interval.
«Reference
points for this work come from my interest in the historic changes brought about in art by the
social and cultural upheavals and rapid developments in
science and technology in the 1960's and 70's.
The
point here is that the US Government pays lip - service to the need for, and role of,
social sciences in their physical
sciences research programs.
It's an excellent connection
point for various subjects, such as
science, math, health, even history and
social studies.
[11:12 a.m. Updated For a deeper look at
social science research on the potential of communication and marketing to influence America's climate choices, I encourage you to read «Communication and Marketing as Climate Change Intervention Assets,» a paper
pointed out by Matt Nisbet and Robert Brulle, among others working in that arena.]
Continued exploration of new areas of knowledge, such as theoretical and applied research in behavioural
science and economics addressing ecological and
social tipping
points and irreversibility at multiple levels.
As for the various historical,
social, rhetorical, religious and other «good» reasons to talk about denialism, I see no
point in pursuing those, given I'm really only interested in the
science.
Put differently, there's a descriptive and important
social science sense in which questioning other people's motives is, maybe, beside the
point.
the
social sciences in general lack rigor only read the link, not going to read the actual study, so your
point is valid
In this month's Yale Climate Connections «This Is Not Cool» video, by regular contributor and independent videographer Peter Sinclair, Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe
points out that the «greatest advances» in understanding of climate change over the past decade have come not from the physical
sciences, but from the
social sciences.
So if ever CAGW (the
social phenomenon, almost nothing to do with actual climate events or [unbiassed]
science), then I for one would be watching to see if a new memeplex arose from some of the components of skepticism, which at that
point would likely mushroom.
My essay maps the expected touch -
points of a memeplex to the *
social * phenomenon of CAGW (i.e. excluding any actual climate events, or any genuine
science; biased or corrupted
science is of course fair game to a memeplex).
Taking a neutral stance at this
point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication of the
science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens of thousands of additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic
science and discussion of the
science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification of the nature of the
social and political issues — is just not credible.
Of course, the success of this focus on melding natural and
social sciences for the purpose of decision - making depends on the existence and effective use of the work of the relevant
social scientist experts, as we
pointed out earlier in our review comment on the draft plan.