Sentences with phrase «social scientists believe»

Some social scientists believe there's a correlation with the rise of socialism in that country.

Most social scientists believe that both information deficit / misinformation surplus and cultural biases contribute to the problem.

Tough says that until recently, most social scientists believed the most important factor in a child's success was his or her IQ.

Not exact matches

• Social scientists in the 1960s believed it would take decades of consistent government pressure to persuade Americans to change their reproductive habits and have small families.

In other words, [today] there are more defined issues, and more people who definitely believe, more social scientists who believe, there is no cause - and - effect relationship between televised violence and social behavior.

«But there is not a strong empirical understanding of what scientists believe to be their social responsibilities.»

Inspired by Albert Einstein and others, Claude believes that the education of young scientists and health professionals must be bound by a social contract that safeguards their freedom to travel, associate, and communicate freely, but asks in return that they do no harm and direct their talents toward caring for all human beings and the earth we inhabit.

Social scientists have long wondered why so many people believe in God.

He believes those scientists «have a responsibility to raise the profile of the importance of social factors to health.»

But Edward O. Wilson, the Harvard professor of biology who is the father of sociobiology and the world's leading expert on social insects, believes that the virtues which GCMA imbued him with were crucial to forming his character, as a citizen and a scientist.

Previous research had found methylation differences in the brains of insect queens and workers — making many scientists believe these differences cause the animals to take on different social roles.

Scientists believe that the quality and size of the social relationships nurtured in childhood may have important physiological consequences for physical and mental health for youth.

SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA — 87 % of scientists believe they and their peers should take an active role in public policy debates, according to a Pew Research Center report presented by Lee Rainie of the Pew Internet and American Life Project during «Scientists Engaging with Reporters, the Public, and Social Media: Survey Findings,» a session yesterday at the annual meeting of AAAS, which publishes Sciencscientists believe they and their peers should take an active role in public policy debates, according to a Pew Research Center report presented by Lee Rainie of the Pew Internet and American Life Project during «Scientists Engaging with Reporters, the Public, and Social Media: Survey Findings,» a session yesterday at the annual meeting of AAAS, which publishes SciencScientists Engaging with Reporters, the Public, and Social Media: Survey Findings,» a session yesterday at the annual meeting of AAAS, which publishes Science Careers.

We believe this special issue is rather unique in assembling scientists, philosophers, clinicians and social scientists.

But if individual scientists doing what they love and advancing their own spheres of influence, impact and support on Instagram are even to the tiniest extent create greater public exposure to minority scientists and changing stereotypes via social media (which I believe they are, based on data), I think some freaking celebration is deserved.

However, many educators and social scientists who study education believe that standardized tests are not necessarily an accurate measure of how much students learn in a given school year.

Scientists believe that these social skills evolved as humans domesticated dogs.

Though scientists are unsure of why Northern Residents are the only orcas to have such a defined behavior, they believe the rubbing beaches and the consequent body - rubbing behavior have significant roles in the Northern Resident orca's social structure and culture.

Some social scientists present an argument that there is reason to believe that winning the Nobel Prize is likely to influence the likelihood of universities making job offers to you (although they say that in the case of any one particular job offer they will not be able to absolutely prove this).

On the social science question «Do 97 % of scientists believe most post-1865 climate change is human - caused?»

Emory University political scientists Steven Webster and Alan Abramowitz believe they have identified a powerful cultural reflex that could help us to better understand the odd correlation between social conservatism and climate denial.

When stats about the number of scientists supporting these likely false theories, it is NOT climate scientists, but often social scientists, so don't believe those numbers.

If they didn't believe a Mexican telling them that raters can't be biased with respect to the outcome of the study — since said outcome in entirely in their hands — or the importance of independence, and bliindness to the identity of the authors / participants, I assume they just asked some white people who would know, some social scientists who are experts in subjective rater study design, interrater reliability, etc..

The one action I believe a true scientist can take in these circumstances is to be on the lookout for instances where social and academic pressure is being applied to suppress ideas — ANY ideas, and to stand up and be counted in opposition to this.

It is no surprise that environmental economists and other social scientists with an interest in renewable energy also believe that their research can change the world (and bring in a few research grants and raise their academic profiles at the same time).

The idea that public conflict over climate change persists because, even after years and years of «consensus messaging» (including a $ 300 million social - marketing campaign by Al Gore's «Alliance for Climate Protection»), ordinary Americans still just «haven't heard» yet that an overwhelming majority climate scientists believe in AGW is patently absurd.

The idea that public conflict over climate change persists because, even after years and years of «messaging» (including a $ 300 million social - marketing campaign by Al Gore's «Alliance for Climate Protection»), ordinary Americans still just «haven't heard» yet that an overwhelming majority climate scientists believe in AGW is absurd.

Because many social scientists, policymakers, and members of the general public believe that a two - parent household is the optimal setting for children's development, the decline in such households has generated widespread concern about the well - being of American children.