It is not less than astonishing that
these social thinkers of twenty - five centuries ago recognized this fact.
Best known for his classic defense of liberty and polemic against statism, The Road to Serfdom, Friedrich Hayek was deservedly honored by the Nobel Prize as one of the most influential economic and
social thinkers of the twentieth century.
Not exact matches
Plenty
of thinkers have argued that time abroad increases important skills for business success like comfort with ambiguity, confidence when confronted with the unfamiliar, and accelerated learning, but the team
of social scientists out
of Rice University, Columbia, and the University
of North Carolina behind this study wanted to test the effects
of extended travel abroad on self knowledge specifically.
So as the idea developed, about 6 months after doing this kind
of exploration where we'd meet continually with a whole bunch
of different people, industry
thinkers and stuff, it became clear that we could actually start a company around this and we could build the world's first
social magazine.
As noted by leading
thinkers on this topic, such as David Armano and Jeffrey Dachis,
social business is changing the very core
of such functions as sales, marketing, IT, HR, and product design as it relates to customer engagement.
Yet,
thinkers from Edmund Burke to Russell Kirk have shown the deeply anti-conservative bases
of the
social contract theory
of Lockean (and Hobbesian) origin, one that is premised upon a conception
of human beings as naturally «free and independent,» as autonomous individuals who are thought to exist by nature detached from a web
of relationships that include family, community, Church, region, and so on.
(5) The most urgent ecumenical dialogue between Russia and Rome today must focus on a new generation
of Russian Orthodox
thinkers: those who, having looked hard at the crisis in Ukraine and their Church leadership's propaganda activities on behalf
of the Putin regime, have concluded that Russian Orthodoxy needs a new theory
of Church - and - state — and should develop one in vigorous conversation with serious scholars
of Catholic
social doctrine.
In the years since Humanae Vitae's appearance, numerous distinguished Catholic
thinkers have argued, using a variety
of evidence, that each
of these predictions has been borne out by the
social facts.
The alternative position is to wrestle, as Christian
thinkers, with the question: What kinds
of social, economic, and political changes are required in our own society if the United States is to abandon its alliances with local oppressors in Latin America?
This stress on the juristic aspect
of Islam is plainly a reaction against the deviating Sufis and Muslim free -
thinkers whose attitude toward Muslim law had loosened the bonds
of social and religious discipline.
With its Marxist sheen dulled, much
of this debate has ceased to be about class divisions (although it retains that edge in certain
thinkers) and more so about mentalités — mindsets or common outlooks — that comprise the beliefs inhabiting the
social imaginary.
Before, however, we look at the questions
of intellectual openness, fellowship with other faiths and
social engagement, it will help to see why many
thinkers picture the new century — it seems presumptuous to speculate about the new millennium — as very different from the century that is drawing to a close.
[2] Some
thinkers believe that the hard sciences, especially biology, need the same sort
of reconceptualisation that I am suggesting for the
social sciences.
Allow this center in a man to remain dulled by the crowd; allow it to continue dissipated by busyness; permit it to go on evading its function by a round
of distractions, or to lull itself by a carefully chosen rotation
of pleasures; abandon it to its attempt to drug, to narcotize suffering and remorse which might reveal to it its true condition; let it wither away the sense
of its own validity by false theories
of man's nature,
of his place in the
social pattern,
of his way
of salvation; in short, allow any
of these well - known forms
of domestication
of man's responsible core as an individual, to continue unchallenged, and you as a
thinker and a friend
of men have committed the supreme treason!
It is just a bunch
of books — not the writings
of men wrestling with a god any more than other
thinkers who never mention gods and also have political or
social agendas.
John Shea, a young theologian and author
of three books, says that many fine
thinkers of his generation prefer to «act out what they believe in
social or political programs, or talk out their ideas in conferences and workshops, rather than write them out.»
Changing political circumstances altered political ideals over the next seventy years, such that pro-Catholic
thinkers such as Félicité de Lamennais gradually began to endorse liberalism's doctrine
of religious liberty as a way
of providing safe harbor for the Church's
social influence within a French state that was no longer officially Catholic.
We are a long way from the
Social Gospel
thinkers who believed they could intuitively apply the ethics
of Jesus to the conduct
of national affairs.
In opposition to the reductionist
social science
of secular
thinkers like Freud, Durkheim and Marx, Eliade took a stand for the autonomy
of religion and the humanistic paradigm
of explanation.
Kierkegaard was persistently aware, as few Christian
thinkers have been,
of the incompatibility
of Christian attitudes with those we so naturally and easily learn from our
social environment.
A few years after this critique
of development from a Third World standpoint, a second dissenting movement appeared, primarily among
social thinkers in advanced industrial countries.
Both
of these
thinkers tend to confuse the
social nature
of I - Thou with the
social nature
of I - It, the reality
of true dialogue with the indirect togetherness
of ordinary
social relations.
Nonetheless, for those wanting to explore their own religious beliefs (or non-belief) by reading an honest and skeptical affirmation
of the Christian faith by one
of the world's best
thinkers and
social scientists, this book recommends itself.
As a result, certain intangibles — such as values based on our more noble human impulses — are gradually entering the scope
of leading
thinkers, including historians,
social scientists, businessmen and bankers — and even economists.
Which is appropriate, after all, since most
of the ancient
thinkers who have inspired her work certainly understood that our quest for eudaimonia is profoundly dependent upon the
social order in which we live and think.
In any case, it is interesting that many
of the contextual
thinkers of the past several decades do not seem to be interested in the
social impact
of these developments.
A generation before the existential Now theologians were shouting it from the front lines, he knew that the safest place for the Christian
thinker was in the midst
of the
social struggle.
Thinkers as diverse as Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill, Edmund Burke, Alexis de Tocqueville, Herbert Spencer, Max Weber, and the holders
of the Chair
of Peter, to name but a few, all have addressed the
social question in one form or another.
Catholic
social thinkers mounted an early and sustained critique
of the doctrinaire individualism and the abstract
social contract approaches
of theorists on whom modern liberalism rests: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and their followers.
Yet no recent Catholic
thinker has attempted to explore
social and political realities with anything like the comprehensiveness and trenchancy
of Maritain or Dawson.
The apparatus
of scholarship is there, but the book's each and every claim represents a radical reduction
of social reality and experience, particularly Faludi's presumption that any rethinking undertaken by any feminist at any time, if the
thinker in question comes out at some place Faludi dislikes, constitutes a prima facie case that the woman in question has become a backlash pawn.
Had James not cast Royce so thoroughly into his shadow — had American philosophy followed the path
of a
thinker with his eye on the Absolute rather than that
of the shrewder
social pragmatism
of Dewey — the intellectual history
of twentieth - century America might have been different.
Theology must be formulated in the terms
of the
social mind
of the time, which meant, for the Chicago
thinkers, in democratic categories and thought forms shaped by the influence
of modern science.
At the University
of Chicago Divinity School,
thinkers who participated in the
social gospel tradition developed the socio - historical understanding
of Christianity and applied this perspective to Biblical, historical, and systematic study.
Although
social surveys indicate that roughly 80 percent
of Americans believe in life after death, it is a belief cherished against the grain
of perceived official skepticism; and among academically trained religious
thinkers, one finds a greater measure
of skepticism than in the population at large.
From time to time
thinkers and pastors, identified at the time by authority as «heretics», seen by others as prophets, and by some historians now as
social revolutionaries, reached the conclusion that the Christian Gospel spoke
of a body
of Christians,
of an incipient «Church»,
of a kind far removed from the type
of political and economic structure maintained by Roman Canon Law.
Unfortunately, those Wesleyans who recognized the weakness
of the
social gospel in this respect tended to react against its passion for
social righteousness as a whole and to interpret Wesley falsely as an individualistic
thinker.
The deep - seated character
of American racism expressed itself in the policies
of the labor unions that
Social Gospel
thinkers supported so strongly.
Our unique curriculum inspires students to evolve into confident, creative
thinkers with a strong sense
of social and environmental responsibility.
Parents make the critically necessary sacrifice without which society would collapse like Jeb Bush's presidential campaign: We shell out vast sums
of money on everything from diapers to chess camp to prepare the next generation
of taxpayers, who will be funding the retirement
of people like the childless / childish Meghann Foye, whose pay - me - even - if - I - didn't - do - anything attitude says not «imaginative
social thinker,» but «squeegee man.»
This is Worthwhile: A blog someone once called «a
thinker blog,» I write about relationships, separation, thoughtful, gentle parenting, recipes, and
social aspects
of feminist mothering.
Also in the late «80s, a number
of leading
thinkers in the Waldorf movement gathered regularly at Rudolf Steiner College, in Fair Oaks, CA, to exploring themes
of Waldorf school organization, finances, economic life and other
social and organizational issues.
Even though new technological infrastructures or individual tools rarely, if ever, change the world in one blow or cause particular events, they still have implications, biases, long - term implications, like the ones discussed by careful, deep
thinkers of long - term change like Harold Innis and Elizabeth Eisenstein and more immediate ones for how we live our lives, as studied by
social scientists willing to let the chips fall as they may.
A feminist
thinker and
social reformer, she had witnessed first - hand the plight
of impoverished women in her native Liverpool and, following her election, made sure that their voices were heard at the highest level.
He is a great
thinker especially on
social policy, his book «Out
Of Ashes» is testament to that and he is full of refreshing ideas especially on social polic
Of Ashes» is testament to that and he is full
of refreshing ideas especially on social polic
of refreshing ideas especially on
social policy.
I don't want to mention too many names but Karen Bradley (formerly
of the Tory policy unit), Philippa Stroud (because
of her lifelong commitment to
social justice), Liz Truss (a radical
thinker on public sector reform), Harriett Baldwin (because
of her knowledge
of the financial world) and Fiona Bruce (because
of her legal and business background) are just five stars - in - the - waiting.
He is described as «a Victorian
thinker fated to live in an unsympathetic modern age», part
of an «ultimately disappointing effort to turn the cloth
of «science» into a wardrobe
of a philosophy
of life and a programme for
social progress», a liberal on race who was «a reflection
of elitist English upper - class attitudes towards the others, be they the races
of Empire, the lower classes in England, or Blacks in the American South».
Following on from her 1987 award - winning The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis
of Reproduction, it establishes Martin as one
of the world's most original and stimulating
thinkers grappling with the cultural and
social context
of science and medicine today.
My «speech» now appears alongside dozens
of others, solicited from selected Americans such as former U.S. presidents,
social and political leaders, business leaders, and
thinkers.
The
thinkers were chosen for «engaging in original and profound ways with the central questions
of the world today,» as well as for their continuing significance for «this year's biggest questions» (in economics, science, philosophy, cultural and
social criticism and in politics).