Sentences with phrase «social wrong does»

A social wrong does not legally excuse a criminal act, ever.

Not exact matches

Having been raised in an instant - reaction world (with Likes and other social media rewards), 40 percent surveyed by the center say they want daily interactions with their boss — and if they don't get it, they often think they've done something wrong.

And don't get me wrong, we got a lot of white liberal votes, but they tended to be people who were involved in social justice.

It needs a complete overhaul, because, as do many family relationships, it creates a blueprint for systemwide dysfunction, characterized by poor social skills, unprofessional behavior, bullying colleagues and inferiors until they become successful enough to bully others — or, if they decide to leave, cutting them off completely, disowning them like a son or daughter who's married the wrong person.

Video Transcript 00:09 Eric Schurenberg: You have the capability of scaring us all with what we're doing wrong in social media.

Don't get me wrong: Social media has a purpose, especially for certain professionals.

A psychological phenomenon known as «negative social proof» would argue that the «right thing» to do becomes questionable when people see the right people doing the wrong things.

Most of the people doing social media marketing are doing it terribly, terribly wrong and they're not seeing measurable success.

If you're using social media for marketing and you're not measuring your dollars - and - cents ROI, you're doing it wrong.

Schroepfer said he disagreed with Kogan's assessment that Facebook didn't have a policy, saying the goal of the platform has been to foster social experiences — and that «those same tools, because they're easy and great for the consumer, can go wrong».

Facebook might have done very little wrong, but the fact that much of what is being reported is permissible according to Facebook's user agreement does create something of a crisis for the social media giant.

Dreher is not wrong to alert us to the destructive power individualism and unbridled desire exert on the social fabric, but he would do even better to recognize that, by God's grace, new forms of order manage to emerge out of the apparent chaos of social fragmentation.

Sorry, 90 % of the planet don't believe in monotheism.I can easily believe that 50 % are wrong, because that's how many people vote for the GOP knowing fully well they've opposed Medicare and Social Security since day one.

When I retire in another 27 years I don't think it would be wrong for me to sign up for Medicare and Social Security after paying into it for 53 years.

How far Jesus himself would have extended this to wrongs done to others, to violence against others, or to political, economic, and social injustice is debatable.

When has Graham, who is on the wrong side of every social issue, ever done anything that wasn't self - serviving?

I agree, social conservatives are doing some things wrong.

«There is something wrong with our theology if we do evangelism but no social work.

Mormonism, Social work groups, peace corps, and do countless works of service and never even have the mention of God, or perhaps the wrong God, but I'm not interested in that.

The author (Barbara Bowen) brought out this point: People in the tent dwelling cultures considered it common courtesy to extend hospitality to a passing stranger (as Abraham did to the three men), and they considered it a social wrong to turn someone away.

It's wrong to imagine this body of doctrine to be a complete system like Thomism, but it did provide a stable, coherent basis for thinking about the social question.

No, The Lord does not get it «wrong», but humans do... every - single - day, social labels notwithstanding.

Murder is wrong for the same reason why most other species don't kill their own kind: It's bad for genetics and it's bad for social unity.

So any sign that the Arsenal boss is right and the negative football experts are wrong is very welcome and the player himself has given us just that, with a p [ost on social media reported by The Mirror in which Alexis seems very happy to be getting back to what he does best and is happy to be doing it with Arsenal after posting a picture with some positive comments alongside it.

The complaint describes this as Freeze allegedly «going to extraordinary lengths through social media and otherwise to promote his self - image as a deeply spiritual Godly man who's done nothing wrong and is being persecuted.»

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Don't get me wrong — I like Pod and, at least on his social media postings, he seemed t have a fantastic attitude — but it pains me that in the end he (and the Bendtners and Gervinhos and Arshavins others pointed to) seemed more comfortable carping about why he wasn't playing as a center forward and complaining about his lack of first - team football opportunities than he was trying to develop the traits and on - field work habits Wenger demanded of them.

Fans on social media have been having their say on these revelations, I didn't think people could have less respect for Payet, but I was wrong:

His future was thrown into question last season as he was not a favourite of the boss, Mourinho, but after the Frenchman laid his future to rest by saying on social media «the papers are wrong, don't listen to them», he regained form towards the end of the season and appeared in both the Carabao Cup and Europa League wins, to claim his third and fourth trophy as a United player.

We hear a lot about are what companies are doing wrong on social media.

In addition to thoughtfully - presented academics, Waldorf teachers help children develop a positive emotional life (emotional health, aesthetics and social skills), a healthy will (confidence and the ability to get things done), and a strong inner compass that discerns right from wrong.

What is really being pushed on parents here is the arbitrary social idea and / or judgment that the earlier the infant does not need intervention the better (in some way for the infant and eventual child and adult) and this concept is inappropriately used as a weapon often by false claims suggesting that if an infant or child can not by some pre-determined age «self - soothe» it never will, or that something is either wrong with them, and is in need of repair, or that their parents are deficient (for not setting «boundaries»).

These include our life of feeling (emotions, aesthetics, and social sensitivity), our willpower (the ability to get things done), and our moral nature (being clear about right and wrong).

But, society, TV, and social media all stared back at me, shaming me, and making me feel that I was doing something bad and very wrong for my child.

I certainly don't think there's anything wrong with moms bragging on social media.

Now to be honest I do not believe there are right and wrong ways about blogging and social media.

But that dismissal of social sciences really does seem to be wrong.

Do they really think the public will go into the polling booth thinking «oh well I would vote for Labour but they can't be trusted on the economy, and I would vote for the Conservatives but they might deliver the wrong kind of recovery, so I think I will marry economic efficiency and social justice and vote for the Liberal Democrats instead»?

Highly open to free trade, relatively few subsidies to businesses, but a high social safety net ensuring that economic efficiency doesn't mean poverty for those caught on the wrong side of technological and social change.

We have a duty to scrutinize our modern day advantages, he avers, as the liberal idea of «social mobility» does not do enough to right past wrongs.

Social housing tenants can't do right for doing wrong.

If you don't, you've got the wrong person running your social media.

A major factor in Jeremy Corbyn's appeal to voters in the recent leadership election — and potentially to the wider electorate as well — was his brave assertion that austerity was the wrong response to recession and was doing absolutely avoidable damage to both economic performance and social cohesion.

What he has, too, is an urgent sense of economic and social crisis - a sense of what has gone wrong in social democracy as well as in wider society (he talks not of a broken society but of a «social recession»)- and the desire to do something about it.

«However, we also wish to admonish Corps embers on their comments and posts in the social media on issues relating to the scheme and advice that, being abusive and deployment of wrong use of words does not reflect responsible attitude and behaviour.

If Jeremy Corbyn is able to say on Thursday to those 50 % of Labour voters who don't yet know what Labour's position is «we are unequivocally for», that can only be a good thing because Labour voters - whether it be because of the social chapter or our economic gains, never mind our place in the world - have a huge amount to gain, and a huge amount to lose if we get this decision wrong.»

It all boils down to training them in the use of Social Media, deleting what goes wrong (as a small company, a mistake won't appear in CNN), and acknowledging that everybody does mistakes.

«We became interested in the plight of people whose career trajectories were derailed because of someone else's unethical behavior — these were people who did nothing wrong themselves but suffered reputational damage merely by being associated with a fraudulent employer or company,» says Takuya Sawaoka of Stanford University, who published a paper today on the «moral spillover» effect in Social Psychological and Personality Science.

«This is what I grew up seeing, so that is what I grew up being: a young adult with a social consciousness to do what I could, and to, at the very least, speak up when I knew something was wrong.»

If it criticizes us before we have the chance to say or do the «wrong» thing, it can help us avoid social humiliation, rejection and isolation.