Each of these monsters, whatever they may have preached about the importance of science, showed the same propensity to interfere with it, to politicize it and to wrench it into conformity with some dull but dangerous, ingenious but ignorant, marketable but murderous Party Line as environmentalist International
Socialism does today.
But all these schemes prove is make a lesson from the past one for the present, too — that socialism doesn't work, and predistribution won't, either.
Socialism does not necessarily leads to tyranny.
By arguing that socialism doesn't work, free - market ideologues may enforce the misguided notion that no publicly owned and operated venture can possibly succeed.
Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev has followed his earlier initiatives in reducing nuclear weapons by making two announcements of momentous import: economically,
socialism does not work, and politically, democracy is the road to the future.
Socialism doesn't mix with GOD's gift of free will.
Admittedly,
socialism does make a strong moral appeal, and in the past this appeal has often been associated with a heavy dose of secularism.
Price has been pilloried on Fox News and trashed by the multimillionaire Limbaugh («I hope this company is a case study in MBA programs on how
socialism does not work, because it's gonna fail»).
Some suggest that the international monetary system of western capitalism may suffer the same sudden collapse as state
socialism did in Russia and its satellite countries.
But Everett agrees with Burgess and Baum that the church in
socialism did not betray the faith, that in many ways it did show the way toward a vital, nonestablished church in a secular environment.
A quick look at those brief moments in American history when
socialism did strike a response tends to confirm the above analysis of the reasons for its more usual unpopularity.
Not exact matches
When the Congressional Budget Office reported that the AHCA stood to strip 24 million people of their health insurance, Congressional Republicans divided into two camps — those who disliked the bill for fear that it would harm their constituents (not to mention their own electoral prospects) and those who
did not feel that the bill went far enough in rolling back the «
socialism» of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
He said founders who
do otherwise are «unwitting puppets» of
socialism who effectively «tax» customers — because prices would have to increase to cover the cost of all that social responsibility.
«It's really not
socialism — quite the opposite,» comments Ford, who supports the idea of a UBI at some point down the road to counter the inability of large swaths of society to earn a living the way they
do today.
«Actually Marx already predicted that there could be a kind of
socialism which combined socialist principles with the achievements of Western capitalist civilizations but he didn't say how this kind of
socialism would work since there was no evidence available during his lifetime,» Su Wei, a professor at a party school for ideological training in Chongqing, in southwestern China, told the Global Times.
Margaret Thatcher's famous quote on
socialism is now being played out in Alberta and it is
doing substantial damage to Alberta's economy and our reputation in the investment world.
The survey found 58 % of millennials favor government - run
socialism (statistically 6 out of 10), while a nearly identical number (64 %) don't want government interference in free markets.
Gary, you probably don't even know the true definition of communism and
socialism.
Where then
does the root - commodities of religious
socialisms truly matter and «riotizingly» materialize upon spatterings regarding irrational causations?
Alas,
does socialisms» decores embellish the brief momentums in timely progressives to be but a short while away and then put upon the shelves to be but dusty gatherings!
If Romney just wants someone who will dutifully parrot the campaign - generated talking points about how Obama is for European
socialism and doesn't understand the business of business while Romney is for the entrepreneurs of free market capitalism America, then Pawlenty is the guy.
You don't even have a clue what «
socialism» means.
Socialism and communism
do not count, although they have no inherent evilness to them either.
To the extent that full - blooded
socialism is returning to compete with liberal democracy for the allegiance of modern persons, it
does so in populist garb — and in the future, its....
Secular / athiest have nothing to
do with
socialism.
Does this not mean that
socialism is then reduced to one ideal alongside others?
James Nuechterlein replies: If Mr. Segermark has his way, the word
socialism will no longer mean what it has always meant» public ownership and control of the means of production» but something along the lines of «left - wing programs I
do not like.»
Not the socially conservative, servant of feel good capitalism that is so prevalent in the U. S. And let's look at it this way, if that mysoginist, drug addicted coward, Rush Limbaugh thinks what the Pope is
doing is
socialism, then the Pope must be
doing something right.
«It's sad because this Pope makes it very clear he doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to capitalism and
socialism and so forth,» Limbaugh said.
People of faith and even of non-faith are all living as rented forms within collective formations ever rising and even falling with the tidal flurries regarding the many societal accolades of a changing tides bantered momentums riding ever continuing laments to rise and then fall upon
socialisms shorelines to be so aligned with subjectivities of placed regionalized variant findings dispersed yet rationed movements in the ever to so be
done fluidic moments by people of faith and also of non-faith.
I absolutely
do not say that capitalism is better than
socialism.
Down through the socialist tradition, the argument repeatedly has been made that capitalism results in gross inequities, and that
socialism can
do away with such foolishness.
The virtue of
socialism, it is argued, is that it
does away with such irresponsible authority, and forces those who make economic policy to appeal to the electorate and to justify their decisions in terms of the public good.
Atheists LOVE communism, fascism and
socialism and so
do Idolaters.
Socialism no more requires a secularist foundation than
does modern science.
This
does not mean, writes Buber, that religious
socialism and the kingdom of God are to be identified.
We can dismiss his
socialism as an unworkable throwback, but he's
doing something our political establishment can't or won't, which is to inspire the political imaginations of middle class voters.
Only if Obama
does it it's
socialism.
How many moral and political systems have
done so on the moral and political levels; and in our day the contest is carried on by
socialism.
Despite the theological appeal of
socialism, it
did not carry the day in Christian thought.
I believe you wanted to say that You don't think
Socialism and Communism are legitimate or maybe successful forms of government or social order.
I
do not believe in God,
Socialism or Communism.
Limbaugh believes that very clear Pope Francis doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to capitalism and
socialism.
And for that reason, one is indeed on trembling ground when one tries to make him some sort of prophet, whether it be for disbelief in a personal god, belief in some sort of non-personal god or in favor of
socialism, which he supported but may not have understood any better than he
did the street grid in Princeton.
In Centesimus Annus and elsewhere, it is clear that the Catholic Church
does not propose an alternative form of political economy, and the idea of a «third way» somehow located between capitalism and
socialism is explicitly rejected.
Does the change in me represent anything more than this: that the practical relevance, the struggle and the confessional character of my theological teaching have become visible to many, and now for the first time to most, against the background of a time which has taken shape at the hands of National
Socialism?.
We
do not yet know why he turned back upon his genuine commitment to National
Socialism — if indeed he
did.
Accountabilities in individualisms and of
socialisms are but dogged increments that neither
do well amidst the ever amassing fundaments of egoisms» parlored affluencies!
And
socialism works quite well in some European countries, so
does universal healthcare.