Employing
socialist programs does not make it a socialist country, dumbass.
@blip: For an analogy, say you win the lottery (IOW find you have a lot of oil) when you're just out of high school, so you don't bother with college or vocational training, but spend your lottery money on partying (IOW
socialist programs).
This is a good answer, but does seem to point the blame at «
socialist programs».
The answer blames
socialist programs for Venezuela's current problems.
Even if women are done with middle aged men, they still need them to be doing the lion shares of the work in the economy and pay the taxes to fund the government
socialist programs that benefit women at the expense of men.
But my glee was short - lived as I recalled Obamacare, «green» jobs, and the panoply of
socialist programs on the books and in the playbooks of the Democrats (and some Republicans).
Anyway those are
socialist programs, and we all know that is a slippery slope to communism.
Capitalism is designed primarily to prevent the objectives which socialists seek, and its adherents will strongly resist the measures necessary to adapt private enterprise to anything seriously approaching
a socialist program.
Furthermore, it is quite possible that Labour would not be able to win the next election to implement a radical
socialist program anyway.
There is absolutely no doubting his genuine commitment to the cause and to
the socialist program he proposes.
The second is Julius Nyerere's post-independence introduction of
a socialist program of collective farming, called ujamaa (a Swahili term for familyhood, extended family, brotherhood).
Not exact matches
Mainly the
socialist social
programs of the U.S. will (more) rapidly bankrupt the country if the U.S. government can't continue to print dollars to inflate it's way out of it's incredible mountain of debt.
True to form of 2006/07,
program expenditures came in under budget, at $ 197.1 billion compared to $ 199.6 billion in the budget â $ «thereby preventing the Canadian Taxpayers Federation from issuing a press release decrying more than $ 200 billion in
socialist waste.
I'm sort of a
socialist but even I know that no government
program can replace a true friend, a true sister and true community.
He calls the latter liberalism rather than socialism, but his advocacy of massive government
programs favoring an «unsubtle, crude, old - fashioned redistribution of wealth, through taxation and public spending» is unmistakably
socialist in inspiration and consequence.
A
socialist type
program can work and does work in other countries, just not here because the insurance companies won't allow it and if you attach the word «
socialist» to anything in America you are deemed un-American.
The USA is so worried about spending more money on social
programs at the risk of becoming «
socialists» it seems as thought they prefer ignorance of the benefits to the bliss of their, um, recession -LRB-?)
They doggishly and sheepishly rail against «socialism» and «democratic socialism» yet as soon as they assume political office, they quickly resort to
socialist intervention
programs.
In passing, an interesting factoid is that claims that the nazis introduced social welfare completely ignore that the statesman and monarchist Otto von Bismarck (1871 - 1890) had created the paternal welfare state in co-opting the
programs of the liberals and
socialists he opposed.
[5] Lane Kenworthy, professor of sociology at the University of California at San Diego, has stated that Sanders is a social democrat and not a democratic
socialist -LSB-...] Mike Konczal, an economic policy expert at the Roosevelt Institute, also characterizes Sanders» positions as «social democracy» rather than «
socialist», noting that social democracy means support for a mixed economy combining private enterprise with government spending, social insurance
programs, Keynesian macroeconomic policies, and democratic participation in government and the workplace - all of which are a part of Sanders» platform.
«SCLV is important for ensuring a clear
program of
socialist demands on a Labour government.»
If you are interested in promoting
Socialist Passions via our Affiliate
Program, you can find information on the Passions Network affiliate progra
Program, you can find information on the Passions Network affiliate
programprogram here.
Important to note, a nationalized education
program is
Socialist and MACC has certainly shown for years that the standards and curricular systems are inferior.
Never one to mince words, Chicago Teacher Union president (and member in good standing of the International
Socialist Organization) Jesse Sharkey proclaimed, «The banks owe us a rebate of hundreds of millions of dollars, which we should invest in 50 sustainable community schools with robust wraparound services, restorative justice
programs, low class sizes and sufficient staffing levels.»
By the mid-1930s, the Soviet space
program was moribund and the Russian avant - garde was squelched, forcibly replaced by
Socialist Realism.
Socialist Realism was a form of heroic political propaganda employed by dictator Joseph Stalin in Russia, from 1929 onwards, to buttress his
program of accelerated industrial development.
There is only one political party that has promoted a disbelief in science or «
socialist conspiracies» in order to distract people into pay attention to abortion and social
programs for the poor.
Or in simple terms, we have applying
socialist type model and we need a capitalist - or model which is concerned about markets, rather mostly as issue of space as a job
program.
Which brings me to the question: do you agree with what I said in my comment at # 9, i.e. that a
program of reforming capitalism in a social democratic /
socialist direction will not succeed in addressing global warming unless it contains a substantial suite of policies specifically aimed at addressing that problem.
Sounds great (and vaguely
socialist, BTW) on first read until you realize that «equalizing» is code for effectively penalizing the (the mostly blue) states that actually improved their health care coverage as the money they would otherwise use to fund their expanded
programs would go to (the mostly red) states that, well, didn't.