Not exact matches
I'm all
about busting out of
societal norms and here are these young people — growing up in a time when there's more freedom than ever — instituting oppressive
rules around sex.
They should become incensed
about slavery, suffrage, and imperialism, just like the movers and shakers of history, who were infuriated enough at
societal injustice to change the
rules.
One can fault his
societal integrity for spying on a legal, non-criminal organization operating within the
rules of a democratic society, but judgments
about that shouldn't be extrapolated to conclusions
about the integrity of scientists within science, even though it's tempting to do that.
For a
rule or principle to constitute a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of s. 7, it must be a legal principle
about which there is significant
societal consensus that it is fundamental to the way in which the legal system ought fairly to operate, and it must be identified with sufficient precision to yield a manageable standard against which to measure deprivations of life, liberty or security of the person.