In today's cultural and political climate, however, to suggest that the current stampede to accept claims that a decade ago would have been regarded as signs of serious psychological disturbance — and that are still regarded as such by eminent psychiatrists — is to risk being shamed and cast to the margins of
society as a bigot.
Not exact matches
Instead, Christians are understood
as homophobes and
bigots, clinging to an outdated and intolerant understanding of sexuality that has no place in a progressive
society.
Scruton believes that Clinton made a fundamental mistake in portraying those who disagreed with the liberal establishment view
as intolerant
bigots who have no place, and thus no voice, in modern
society.
People who continue to oppose gay marriage are being defined
as bigots, and
bigots are outside of polite
society.
When
society systematically denies the difference between male and female in law and custom, our fundamental dignity is diminished, the image of God within us is obscured, unreality becomes legally established, and those who refuse to conform are regarded
as irrational
bigots.
However, in spring 2005, when Raymond Bradley, an atheist in Editorial Board for The Open
Society journal, wrote an open letter to Flew accusing him of not «check [ing] the veracity of [Schroeder's] claims before swallowing them whole,» Flew strongly responded to that charge in a letter published in the same journal in summer 2006, describing the content of Bradley's letter «extraordinary offensive» and the accusation made by him
as an «egregiously offensive charge»; he also implied that Bradley was a «secularist
bigot,» and suggested that he should follow Socrates's advice (
as scripted in Plato's Republic) of «follow [ing] the argument wherever it leads.»