Sentences with phrase «society changed so»

Not exact matches

He has personally participated in vision clinics for low income societies in the United States and South America, and doing so completely changed his perspective of the world.

And it crosses over all these lines: local environmental impact, there's the climate argument, there's the First Nations rights argument, there's the stewardship argument, so it can really draw from a whole wide sector of civil society in the way that the faceless catastrophe of climate change can't.

China and Singapore, by the way, are nondemocratic capitalistic societies, and so it's actually easier for those types of governments to make wholesale change than it is in our case, so they can make the types of systems that we've been talking about, or they could decide to mirror Singapore or whatever, and everybody just kind of has to take it.

Jesus death and resurrection changed the world for the good forever so all of you liberals Christian haters should live with it or go live in societies that show no tolerance.

We are nearly 2000 years out from the New Testament — nearly as so much of the NT was written SO long after the fact — and society has continued to changso much of the NT was written SO long after the fact — and society has continued to changSO long after the fact — and society has continued to change.

But the underlying issue that I see here is why do women (and even men) have to feel so pressured by this society that they have to change their looks.

So, no, demonizing Bush is not going to work in this election, and» as demonstrated in the recent special election in New York's ninth congressional district» the seniors will no longer be swayed by dark warnings that the GOP will end medicare and social security» these older people realize that the programs of the New Deal and the Great Society have become unsustainable and that» somehow» a real and drastic change must happen, soon.

Toby applies the prayer to the hopeful decline and eventual elimination of religion because of its obvious harmfulness to society: we can't change the harm religion has done in the past, so we must serenely move on; we must courageously overcome the dangerous influence of religion in our society; and we must know the difference between harm done and the harm that can be prevented from religion.

According to the Kerner Commission's analysis, racist white America was similarly bereft of moral resources, such that government, rather than the institutions of civil society that had been so central to the classic civil - rights movement, had to become the principal agent of enforced social change in order to deal with the crisis of an America «moving toward two societies... separate and unequal.»

They tend to depict the conditions of people in traditional societies as extremely miserable, so that the changes that strike me as profound violations of their humanity are viewed as progress, however minimal.

Christians did not work for change so that slaves would be regarded as having equal value while maintaining a subordinate status and role in society.

Perhaps it will help us to break free from mutual recriminations and to join together in reaffirming the elemental features of our shared faith that can generate and support the attitudinal changes that are so badly needed in the whole of society.

In a society where accepted wisdom changes by the minute, they claim that some truths are so critical that they must be repeated over and over again.

I agree with not going trying to change the world as in change to people by telling them they are wrong and I am right (IF I have understood your point of view) but I guess I'm not so convinced when it comes to society, and just accepting what ever **** is in there or anywhere.

Atheists are very much discriminated against in our society, and I hope that will change so that more of us can come out of the closet.

With so much profound change occurring, the sense arose among some European intellectuals that the differences between the new global society and the past few centuries is as great as that between the modern period and the medieval one.

These changes also change the structures of power in our society, so that, for example, literate people who know how to access electronic information will have increased power over literate people who don't.

So how many times have you publicly advocated that laws be changed so that your FELLOW CHRISTIANS who are adulterers will be forced to the fringes of societSo how many times have you publicly advocated that laws be changed so that your FELLOW CHRISTIANS who are adulterers will be forced to the fringes of societso that your FELLOW CHRISTIANS who are adulterers will be forced to the fringes of society?

So the account of Noah in the Bible gets retold over and over again among many different cultures and societies and by the time you get it, the gist of the story is the same but some of the details have changed because someone somewhere decided to add an angle to the story that fits their belief in their god.

We are in a crisis because of the present forms of industrial society, it says, and we need a change of course so radical it can come only from new values — or long - lost ancient values needing rediscovery.

Consider a partial list of developments since just World War II: a broad national decline in denominational loyalty, changes in ethnic identity as hyphenated Americans enter the third and subsequent generations after immigration, the great explosion in the number of competing secular colleges and universities, the professionalization of academic disciplines with concomitant professional formation of faculty members during graduate education, the dramatic rise in the percentage of the population who seek higher education, the sharp trend toward seeing education largely in vocational and economic terms, the rise in government regulation and financing, the great increase in the complexity and cost of higher education, the development of a more litigious society, the legal end of in loco parentis, an exponential and accelerating growth in human knowledge, and so on.

so their changing because society no longer excepts their hate,..

How to understand men as fundamentally related to God when their relations to nature and society had so changed presented a most difficult practical as well as theoretical problem.

Of course, even in ancient society there was a small amount of change and development going on all the time, but it was so slow that to man himself it was almost imperceptible.

The successful conquest of the institutions of science by overtly politicized forces would change little on the ground, but it would help to update society's perceptions so that they match the underlying reality.

Our prevailing legal emphasis on the free, self - determining individual fits quite well with the series of economic and social changes that, by liberating so many of us from family and group ties, have dramatically affected the capacity of families to carry out all the tasks for which society continues to rely on them.

Corruption inevitably kicks in so that, in the long run, only the faces at the top have changed and the power of love has not replaced the love of power which is the ultimate transformational solution to the ills of human society that sacred activism always sought.

Besides, most of the people in America do belong to churches, so to say that the churches should change society is a bit like saying society should change itself.

The rewards and penalties are produced by manipulation of corpuscular societies and structured societies so as to change the strength of beauty (very roughly, the measure of pleasure or pain) experienced by the person who is being coerced.

The purpose of moral education is to change people for the better and, in so doing, to improve the quality of life in society; individually and collectively, we are to become better people than we might otherwise be.

Those who seek a plan for reorganizing society on Christian lines make a judgment of society and a demand on the world — the judgment that the world ought not to be as it is, and the demand that society so change that there will be no more war, no more poverty, no more exploitation of man; so change that a Christian finds it satisfactory.

One purpose of this chapter has been to provide tools and techniques for helping people to become aware of and deal constructively with their anger — not so that it will go away, but so that it can be used to bring about constructive changes in a dehumanizing society.

A part is our corrupt society has seemed to have molded people so much that, they don't really change much when they are in the church.

There was no reason to just through out laws which seemed to provide for a stable, peaceful society so they only really changed the parts that didn't mesh with the republican form of government they set up (ie references to the crown, privliges for the nobility, etc).

Tradition changed — in society and in the church — and so the theology changed.

You are so right, Tria, because society is changing every single day and the Church needs to adapt to those changes — Benedict couldn't do it, but Francis absolutely gets it... plus he is Jesuit... they know their stuff — Who am I to judge?

Working with development personnel and faculty, he is raising endowments for chairs in Lutheran studies, evangelical studies and Christian ethics, as well as for the Center for Religion and Society (the name was changed so as to include the Jewish studies program for which the college received a major ongoing grant).

So there is, albeit in a manner which easily leads to misunderstandings, also in Whitehead some sort of «immutability» of God, because change pertains to a nexus (e.g., a society), and God remains one actual entity.

As society and produce continue to change on a daily basis, so are we.

• Revising how subsidies are allotted to producers, and how different practices are taxed across the value chain; • Influence the evolution of production standards so that they guide producers toward increasingly sustainable practices; • Refining public education regarding what are best practices of production systems (and accounting for them), and how to make them more widespread; • Studying the effects different practices and production systems have on society - wide challenges such as public health (and health insurance, whether it is publicly or privately provided), climate change mitigation, job creation and family income, etc..

So for those who think they have found The One, it's because they aren't paying attention to their inner dichotomy between what society expects and their hormonal changes.

Society has changed so much.

This is how we have lived since the beginning (and many people still live today) but our societies have changed so much.

I believe it's our job [as birth workers] to take this on so that we can work to enable every group, culture, and society to have the best birth they can while we fight for universal change.

We can wish that weren't so, we can even work hard to implement the changes in society that will mean that more of those women will be breastfeeding rather than formula - feeding, but at this point in time and for the foreseeable future lots of the women in shelters will be in the situation of formula - feeding and having difficulty getting hold of enough milk in their difficult circumstances, and they * will * need the samples.

In other words, our society's eating patterns have changed so dramatically in the past three or four decades that I just can't view any one treat given to my children in a vacuum anymore, as much as I'd like to.

When the AAP felt youth tackle football had «no place in programs for kids» in the 50's; now in 2015, this is a game so sacred to our society that while, modifying «would likely lead to a decrease in the incidence of overall injuries, severe injuries, catastrophic injuries, and concussions» the AAP can not recommend limiting tackle for young children as «the removal of tackling from football would lead to a fundamental change in the way the game is played.»

I do think rather than criticize the government for making mothers feel guilty for feeding with artificial milk, society as a whole must make major changes in thinking and policy, so that more mothers and babies can actually avoid the use of artificial milk in the first place.

However, waiting won't change the unsupportive support spreading as a result of this collective ignorance of society so those unintentional acts must be addressed.

This has a huge impact on how our society interacts as a whole so come along to one of our groups, have a cup of tea and change the world in a small way with connection and love.