For example, in chapter seven, O'Brien discusses the over-representation of adults with SEND in the criminal justice system, while in chapter nine he asks how we make
our society value people with SEND more.
«
Your society values people by how much they have, ours by how much we give away,» Michael Greyeyes» Sitting Bull says.
Not exact matches
If the majority of
people fall further and further behind — while others in
society become unbelievably rich — the notion that the most important
value in a country is its citizens having the ability to select their leaders will lose sway.
Millennial 1: What, is money your only benchmark for judging a
person's
value in
society?
Behind all this banter lies a big idea: That by de-emphasizing economic growth and considering other things that
people value,
societies could make much better decisions about how to use their scarce resources.
«These are all things that
people have bought in the past, and driven to completely irrational prices, not because they did anything useful or produced any money and
value to
society, but solely because they thought they would be able to sell them to someone else for more in the future,» he writes.
In the present social and cultural context, where there is a widespread tendency to relativize truth, practising charity in truth helps
people to understand that adhering to the
values of Christianity is not merely useful but essential for building a good
society and for true integral human development.
Moreover, many Americans have become concerned about the indifference toward
values and behavior that was so characteristic of the Great
Society thrust, the aversion to holding persons responsible for those actions that precipitated their own dependence, the assumption that «society» is to blame for all the misfortune in the
Society thrust, the aversion to holding
persons responsible for those actions that precipitated their own dependence, the assumption that «
society» is to blame for all the misfortune in the
society» is to blame for all the misfortune in the world.
The problem can be put thus: How are males in our
society conditioned to
value themselves as
persons?
Both
persons and
societies have a derivative
value in this metaphysical scheme, for it is only actual occasions of experience which have
value in themselves.
When you live in a
society where there is a high
value placed on calling yourself Christian and going to church, and there are even promising career paths available, there's always going to be
people who become Christians for the wrong reasons.
First, its premisses concerning
society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious
people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of
value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day
society.)
With its concern for historical truth and invocation of the need to facilitate the cultivation of the human
person and
society, «Mapping» at this point comes tantalizingly close to this vision only to fall back into statements that «the fundamental sources of
value in a culture are neither necessary nor universal.»
The decision in the Hobby Lobby case helps prevent progressives from achieving their goal of making religious
people into dhimmis, second - class citizens in a
society governed by secular
values.
Every culture and
society has heroes —
people who have lived a life imbued with a sense of
value and contribution that far exceeds the status quo of «just living».
There is a temptation for members of a cultural elite to see their
values as the only respectable virtues, a tendency that blinds the group to both cultural innovation and aesthetic dissent, especially from
people deemed marginal to established intellectual
society.
We don't do that because as
society we believe that those
people have
values.
The freedom of the press is highly
valued in a democracy and, with that freedom comes responsibility and hopefully
people in the trade have integrity and a vision of their role in
society.
There are also
people in such
societies who do not even nominally profess or assume any such allegiance to
values and who pursue their autonomy, relying on the good faith of those who are dedicated to the right.
The
value system of a
person is the set of desires that govern his conduct, and the
values of
society are the will and preferences of the
people as expressed in customs and through the activities of government.
Feminism challenges the legitimacy of sex roles Along with other social movements, feminism is rooted in the critique that a
society so constructed that certain
people and groups profit from inequalities — between men and women, rich and poor, black and white, etc. — is a
society in which money is more highly
valued than love, justice, and human life itself.
They imposed the idea of secular nationalism on the Indian
peoples because they were convinced that it was the best basis for unity of pluralistic India and the best path towards building a new
society based on the
values of liberty, equality and justice.
We can work for good schools that prepare young
people to live as productive members of
society capable of appreciating the finer
values of our heritage.
Also, your
value that
society around you and the
people you encounter should be «benefitted» is able to be questioned.
Both the biblical and philosophical humanisms that emerged in the first and second centuries C.E. were fostered by and responded to two enormous social changes: new discrepancies of status (the same
person could occupy more than one role in a pluralistic and mobile
society), and the downward mobility of
values.
Those theories are reassuring to
people who suspect that «traditional»
values are being eroded by life in a technological, secular
society.
Dr Helen Stokes - Lampard, the chair of the Royal College of GPs told The Guardian: «While at face
value the rise might seem alarming, it could also be indicative of better identification and diagnosis of mental health conditions across healthcare, and reducing stigma associated with mental health in
society, leading to more
people with mental health conditions seeking medical assistance.»
In the encyclical Evangelium Vitae, the Pope expressed this relationship within the framework of the common good: «It is urgently necessary, for the future of
society and the development of a sound democracy, to rediscover those essential and innate human and moral
values which flow from the very truth of the human being and express and safeguard the dignity of the
person:
values which no individual, no majority, and no State can ever create, modify, or destroy, but must only acknowledge, respect, and promote.»
He spoke on the
value of the human
person made in the image of God, on the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity that are fundamental to a just
society, and on the dangers consumer culture poses to spiritual
values.
In democratic
society it
values every individual and maintains academic freedom; in genuinely aristocratic
society it seeks to cherish and nurture the excellent
persons and to maintain their leadership.
Any
people and pastor wishing to take God's Word in Scripture seriously, therefore, will regularly be asking what issues or
values in the surrounding
society are addressed by that Word.
learned peaceful
people have been saying for many years that most muslims and what they are taught is aganist Proper Moral
Values and a peaceful
society, and what they have done is prove these
people to be correct.
Allow me to put this in sociological terms (sociology provides a limited but useful «grammar» here): Every human
society has its own corpus of officially accredited wisdom, the beliefs and
values that most
people take for granted as self - evidently true.
In terms of the political system, the media, again reflecting the
values held by
society generally, give us politics by image, treating politicians and their campaigns as products to be sold rather than as
people and ideas to be understood.
Democracy, on the other hand, is the way we, the
people, have organized ourselves to create the
society that reflects our
values.
I hope that you are actually one of those who just ignores the fact that atheism is amoral and chooses to follow our
society's religious
values anyway and not one of those who secretly uses
people because they realize there's nothing wrong with it.
as long as it is her womb.the baby is a parasite for all she cares... really truly selfish and demeaning of
value of life... very shallow view... no wonder
people get depressed and kill themselves... they feel they have no
value with
society's pathetic view of what life is and how they
value it..
This kind of broad association is of particular
value to a
society like ours, one in which
people are increasingly tribalized and segregated and even a laudable
value like diversity can be trivialized, as when a mother brags about how her child attends such a «wonderfully diverse» prep school, what with the boy from Senegal whose dad is a UN diplomat and the girl from Sri Lanka whose mom is an officer with the World Bank.
Second,
society tends for the most part to judge the fruits of a
person's life in the light of its own
values and priorities.
We live in a
society that wants to
value everyones opinion right up until that
person starts claiming any sort of exclusivity about their opinion.
The church can reorient
society through the redirection of men's
values, enabling them to be sensitive to the worth of
persons, to respond with concern for their needs, and to establish corporate structures of justice.
You can be a
person who does not believe in God and still behave according to major ethical and moral
values of the
society you live in, but to follow a faith requires a belief in God.
My basic appeal is for the development of a vision and a set of
values appropriate to the emerging biological realities of the planetary
society as an essential ingredient in accomplishing the political transformation that the fulfillment of life for all of earth's
people demands.
Such universal responsibility is incompatible with a spiritualism that limits the Church's concern to immaterial
values, with a moralism that does not understand the
value of the sin ner and the sinful nation, with an individualism that makes mankind as a whole and its
societies of less concern to God than single
persons, and with any of those particularistic and polytheistic theories of
value and responsibility which substitute for God - in - Christ some other deity as the source of valuable being.
MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES SYNONYMS 1.1 A particular system of
values and principles of conduct, especially one held by a specified
person or
society: a bourgeois morality MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES 1.2 The extent to which an action is right or wrong: behind all the arguments lies the issue of the morality of the possession of nuclear weapons MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
But in two regions of the population are a minority of
persons who are either presently excluded from many of the benefits of the
society or alienated from some of its operating assumptions and
values.
There is considerable resonance between what ordinary
people in
society value and what the megachurches have to offer.»
We know that television entertains us, a companion ever ready with the escape and fantasy we sometimes need, but also that it cultivates a mean world full of violence, that its
values and stories demean and dehumanize us, and that its religious impact is the very antithesis of the Christian faith in which most
people in our
society profess to believe.
In fact, the religious view considers the secularist «mechanical materialist view of reality as too reductionist and as leaving out the «organic» and «spiritual» dimensions of human being and history and therefore as unable to renew the
values of humanism and its reverence for life and the dignity of the human
person in
society in the name of which secularism started to protest against religious authoritarianism.
If I interpret the prospectus of the CMC correctly, the objective of the CMC namely to «impart to men and women an education of the highest order in the art and science of medicine and to equip them in the spirit of Christ for service In the relief of suffering and promotion of health», that is, the idea of a combination of training in professional skills, moulding the technically trained in a culture of human
values and motivation, equipping them to utilize technology to serve «with compassion and concern for the whole
person», the
people especially the weaker sections of
society, and giving spiritual reinforcement of that culture by the «spirit of Christ» and the motto «Not to be Ministered unto but to Minister» derived from him, goes back in tradition to the founder herself (Prospectus MBBS Course p. 5).