I feel a Catch - 22 with this concept as it showcases the kind of
society we live in where becoming a viral sensation is the norm in 2016.
Not exact matches
However, we
live in a
society where far more people understand stories
in terms of visual images rather than text, especially on the internet (YouTube, Pinterest, Tumblr, etc.).
Ms. Huffington writes about her vision for a
society and workplace culture
where sleep is prioritized over pushing the limits and burning the candle at both ends
in her new book The Sleep Revolution: Transforming Your
Life, One Night at a Time.
«We
live in a
society where everybody's used to an instantaneous response,»
life coach Debra Smouse tells HuffPost.
«It's quite normal for Americans and Western people to behave like this — they
live in free sex
societies where nobody cares about this sort of thing, so what do you expect?»
We knew we wanted to produce ethically made clothing and work with a foundation that improves the
lives of women
in a
society where they are often forgotten and left behind.
We
live in a
society where there is a lot of abundance, and it goes to people with good minds who have been well trained and who work hard.
Like any of number of fictional futures, from Metropolis to Altered Carbon, it is a
society where the wealthy
in live in glistening towers
in the clouds, surrounded by technologies of luxury and convenience, looking down on an underclass that can not afford basic necessities.
We are
living in a world
where the financial sector is waging class war against al the rest of
society.
We are
living in a
society where there is a need for human connection and a sense of community.
We
live in a
society where people find it absolutely difficult to transact over national borders due to currency barriers.
After all, we
live in a
society of spin doctors and slanted bias
where a taking person at their word is not failsafe,
where even longstanding institutions lose our trust as we uncover their darker activities.
Nothing is skewed toward men, we
live in a
society where women can just say «Off with his head» and quite frankly you want to see it stay that way Ms. Matriarchal propaganda spewer.
In later life he served for three years as acting secretary to the British embassy in Paris, where he much enjoyed literary society and was himself greatly appreciated, earning the sobriquet «le bon David.&raqu
In later
life he served for three years as acting secretary to the British embassy
in Paris, where he much enjoyed literary society and was himself greatly appreciated, earning the sobriquet «le bon David.&raqu
in Paris,
where he much enjoyed literary
society and was himself greatly appreciated, earning the sobriquet «le bon David.»
But we are
living in a world
where this government has promoted an attitude to
life which now aspires not simply to referee public behavior but to control the very thoughts we have and to decide on that basis whether we are legitimate members of
society or not.
In particular, Francis articulated «four specific principles which can guide the development of life in society and the building of a people where differences are harmonized within a shared pursuit.&raqu
In particular, Francis articulated «four specific principles which can guide the development of
life in society and the building of a people where differences are harmonized within a shared pursuit.&raqu
in society and the building of a people
where differences are harmonized within a shared pursuit.»
Because
in the end that is what helps our
society... a
society where my friends, my family, my children
live.
When you
live in a
society where there is a high value placed on calling yourself Christian and going to church, and there are even promising career paths available, there's always going to be people who become Christians for the wrong reasons.
How are people seeking to dismantle the divides between Jew and Gentile, slave and free, male and female supposed to
live in a
society where these divisions were so central to the culture and
where doing so my arouse even more suspicion and persecution?
It, it, it's enough for me to say that we
live in a
society where it's not considered fine.
Once more, it is the world that dictates how the Christian shall act; since he
lives in the midst of a
society where revolutionary movements are rife, he must take his cue from that
society.
In a society where she would not likely live past 40 and half of her children would die in infancy this was a good ide
In a
society where she would not likely
live past 40 and half of her children would die
in infancy this was a good ide
in infancy this was a good idea.
Were it to be destroyed overnight, who would provide the minimal necessities for
life in a
society far removed from the soil or the sea,
where basic human needs are met?
In a society founded on the exaltation of freedom it is understandable that the desire to satisfy one's human appetites takes an ever firmer grip on individuals who live in an environment where they have considerable spending power and great encouragement to spend on pleasures and material good
In a
society founded on the exaltation of freedom it is understandable that the desire to satisfy one's human appetites takes an ever firmer grip on individuals who
live in an environment where they have considerable spending power and great encouragement to spend on pleasures and material good
in an environment
where they have considerable spending power and great encouragement to spend on pleasures and material goods.
On the other hand, the non-Christian — the one who,
living under a tyrannous regime or
in a
society where, it seems, social injustice will never end, wants to kill the tyrant or destroy the
society; the one who, exploited or degraded by a colonialist regime, wants to kill the oppressor; the man who, victimized by a racist
society, wants to avenge by violence the indignities heaped upon him — all these, along with their violence, their hatred, their folly, must be accepted by those of us who are Christians.
However, we
live in a pluralistic
society where freedom of religion is the rule of law and
where nobody has any right to demand that anyone change or cease performing their religious duties simply because of offensive implications, which are inherent to all Western religious practice.
society,
where sin is viewed as little more than psychological maladjustment, or behavior arising out of corrupt economic structures, or as a failure of the educational system, baptism reminds us that,
in spite of Gestalt and I'm OK, You're OK, what we do naturally is not the best we could do, that our inborn selfishness and pride are
life - and - death matters, that Christians are made, not born.
This is why fundamentalism is so dangerous
in a world
where both many national
societies are becoming multi-ethnic and multi-faith and the
lives of all people are becoming increasingly interdependent
We
live in a
society where «sex sells»,
where in tv, media, magazines, etc. women are seen as something men can use like a tool or plaything for their own pleasure (look at playboy!).
And second is that we
live in a
society just like our faith teaches us of free will
where people can choose to worship or not at all.
And thank God we
live in a
society where you can express yourself freely and use your family SUV as a mobile conveyance device for your political views and other things you're angry about.
«We are here to signify that we are not going away, that we are not going to remain quiet while injustice occurs and we are not going to stop working and educating and championing and fighting until we
live in a
society where the humanity, dignity and the rights of every member of our nation are together recognised.»
Why should a gay man or woman still repent, and return to God and his Church, when the secular
society becomes a kind of pseudo-church
where gays can be «happy» despite the absence of God's presence who is
life and cure
in himself (the great benefit of the true Church is the presence of God there who is
life, cure and love
in himself; the presence of God
in the church causes real happiness)?
God has some patience with the sinners (who really commit harmful acts), and hopes that they may shift from the secular
society where they merely exist, to the Church,
where they could find
life in fulness.
While this can separate some churches too much from
society, it can also assist the small church
in living on the margins of
society,
where opportunity for mission knocks.
for every priest that violated his vows and the trust of his parishioners there will someday be a reckoning... true the head always suffers for his members that go astray... but the Brits don't understand the Catholic church if they think that we are going to accept practicing man and females gays into the priesthood and except the pope to issue condoms for the prevention of AID they got something else coming... If the Brits want to
live in a perverse
society where every thing goes that their moral problem!!
The secular
society shall be a place
where sinners can exist (note that mere existence is no
life in abundance)
in an organised way despite their sinful behaviour which damages others, themselves and God's holiness.
One way of viewing the religious crisis of our time is to see it not
in the first instance as a challenge to the intellectual cogency of Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, or other traditions, but as the gradual erosion,
in an ever more complex and technological
society, of the feeling of reciprocity with nature, organic interrelatedness with the human community, and sensitive attention to the processes of
lived experience
where the realities designated by religious symbols and assertions are actually to be found, if they are found at all.
«We
live in one of the most affluent cultures
in history
where many of the values of an increasingly materialistic
society stand
in direct conflict with the gospel vision,» they charged.
We misunderstand even the practical / pastoral thrust of the Bible whenever we compare or equate it with the pastoral concerns of an established religion - with the maintenance of the
life of parish and clan
in a
society where there are no longer any challenges being addressed to the powers that be, no longer any new believers coming
in across the boundaries of nation and culture, and no longer any new threatening issues needing to be wrestled with on the missionary frontier.
Matters of belief should be discussed with care and an open view for the thoughts of others on all sides or someday we will
live in a
society like Pakistan
where Ministers get shot for their belief and scharia is forced upon the people.
Evidence of the fact that union differentiates is to be seen all round us —
in the bodies of all higher forms of
life,
in which the cells become almost infinitely complicated according to the variety of tasks they have to perform;
in animal associations,
where the individual «polymerises» itself, one might say, according to the function it is called upon to fulfil;
in human
societies,
where the growth of specialization becomes ever more intense; and
in the field of personal relationships,
where friends and lovers can only discover all that is
in their minds and hearts by communicating them to one another.
In short, I would rather build community and dialogue and live in a society where abortion, due to the love ready to be given to any child and any mother, is not merely illegal but unthinkabl
In short, I would rather build community and dialogue and
live in a society where abortion, due to the love ready to be given to any child and any mother, is not merely illegal but unthinkabl
in a
society where abortion, due to the love ready to be given to any child and any mother, is not merely illegal but unthinkable.
It's astounding here we
live in a free
society where faeries can be faeries but a normal person can't be normal or even voice an opinion without being castrated.
At the same time, we have witnessed the failure of most familiar forms of communality — dramatically so
in Eastern Europe, but also
in our own
society,
where a deep cynicism informs all public
life and institutions.
Thus, the primary mission of the church is the proclamation and building up of the church, that new
society based
in the kingdom of God
where an alternate personal, economic, social, and spiritual
life - style can be modeled.
In contrast, the neo-Freudian Erich Fromm becomes quite unrealistically utopian in his hope for the «sane society» of reasonable men, and he never asks where the individual can find in present history the community which can sustain the spirit which must live in this threatening and imperfect world
In contrast, the neo-Freudian Erich Fromm becomes quite unrealistically utopian
in his hope for the «sane society» of reasonable men, and he never asks where the individual can find in present history the community which can sustain the spirit which must live in this threatening and imperfect world
in his hope for the «sane
society» of reasonable men, and he never asks
where the individual can find
in present history the community which can sustain the spirit which must live in this threatening and imperfect world
in present history the community which can sustain the spirit which must
live in this threatening and imperfect world
in this threatening and imperfect world.2
And as Berger has written
in his famous work, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise
in the Sociology of Knowledge (1966), what one knows often depends on what
society one
lives in,
where one resides
in that
society, and how one «chooses» his parents or occupation.
A community is
where «
life is
lived,» a
society is an association
in rational action, and the mass is man caught up by stimuli
in which there are no real social bonds.12 The idea of the community — the willed entity — is important for the form of the church.13
Morelli decries the fact that «we
live in a
society where the
life of the worst criminal is worth more than that of an unborn child.»