Sentences with phrase «society with free speech»

«You can have a society with free speech where I call you names, and you do rude drawings of me, and I say you're a hater, and we hatey - hatey - hate each other,» said Steyn on my TV special, «Censorship in America,» but «the alternative is the Muslim world where there's no open debate, and so there's nothing left to do but kill and bomb and shoot.»

Not exact matches

Novak identifies the United States as a liberal society in the process of maturing, and proposes that the liberty of this society has and always will be dependent upon vigilance of mind with regard to such concerns as free speech, terrorism, and freedom of the press.

Free speech is a right that comes with responsibility, but silencing everything that offends people even slightly results in an oppressed society.

The New Patriotic Party (NPP) in Ghana believes in the principles that democratic societies provide individuals with the best conditions for political liberty, personal freedom, equality of opportunity and economic development under the rule of law; and therefore being committed to advancing the social and political values on which democratic societies are founded, including the basic personal freedoms and human rights, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; in particular, the right of free speech, organization, assembly and non-violent dissent; the right to free elections and the freedom to organize effective parliamentary opposition to government; the right to a free and independent media; the right to religious belief; equality before the law; and individual opportunity and prosperity.

Fraga surrounded himself with a younger team and focused his speeches on the risks of socialism, such as the creation of dependent societies, which, through their support of welfare and subsidies, weakened values such as work, responsibility and merit; in turn, societies would become less competitive and free.

He said Buhari acknowledged that as a key component of democratic principles, people in democratic societies «are so emotionally attached to free speech that they would defend it with all their might».

This is something Humanists UK has been calling for since at least 2011, when Humanist Students societies first experienced issues with SUs blocking their free speech.

Handlarski, principal of RH Criminal Defence, says there's a «problem» in society with people claiming they have the right to restrict free speech because they feel unsafe.

They also debated balancing free online speech protections with national security and danger to society, including discussion of recent smartphone security and privacy issues between law enforcement and privacy advocates.

In 2006, Fred was presented with the «First Amendment Award» of the Central Ohio Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists for his work on free speech and public access issues and the Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers» first ever «Courage» award for his wide ranging public interest litigation.

, legislative facts and law (the WHO website shows that drinking water is not safe in that country, so little Jethro won't be moving overseas with dad any time soon), or less crucially about everyday society, like contextual facts and definitions — such as how free speech is jealously protected, how children can't really be blamed for being born out of wedlock, or how married women are natural bartenders.

v. Law Society of B.C. reviewed the disciplinary activity of the law society in B.C. over advertising practices, and emphasized the distinctions between the freedom of expression with the elective process in our democratic institutions, and that of economic free Society of B.C. reviewed the disciplinary activity of the law society in B.C. over advertising practices, and emphasized the distinctions between the freedom of expression with the elective process in our democratic institutions, and that of economic free society in B.C. over advertising practices, and emphasized the distinctions between the freedom of expression with the elective process in our democratic institutions, and that of economic free speech,

I might be more impressed with the Law Society's commitment to the Charter if it questioned the accreditation of law schools whose university's codes of conduct are routinely used to suppress free speech on campus — Ottawa, York, Calgary being some notable, infamous, recent examples), it's not clear why a university's commitment to charter values is at all relvant to the function of the LSUC, namely to: ``... to ensure that,

Yet living cooperatively in society requires that we, as real estate professionals, must balance our right to free speech with the public's right to safety and aesthetic standards.