Not exact matches
[3] I also calculate the
percentage of students in all grades who were eligible for the federal free or reduced - price lunch program, an indicator of
socioeconomic disadvantage.
The PISA data indicate that the observed variation in the distribution of student characteristics across countries does not place the United States at a
disadvantage in international assessments compared with other highly developed countries; students with high levels of
socioeconomic status had an educational advantage over their low SES counterparts across all 20 countries, even after considering the differences in the
percentage of students who are immigrants, from less - advantaged homes, non-native language speakers, and other factors.
While the overall U.S. performance fell far behind top performers, such as Singapore, Japan, and Canada, the United States made the biggest improvement in equity from 2006 to 2015, increasing its
percentage of «resilient students» — defined as
disadvantaged students who perform better than predicted by their
socioeconomic status — by 12
percentage points, as shown in the below image from the report.
Specifically, the United States had the largest increase — 12
percentage points — in the
percentage of «resilient» students, defined as
disadvantaged students who perform better than predicted by their
socioeconomic status.