Not exact matches
«Even when adjusted to take into account
socioeconomic factors and health behaviours (physical activity, tobacco, alcohol, nutrition) in adulthood, associations remained very significant, especially
among women, who were often less susceptible to benefit from social mobility.»
Writing in a linked Comment, Alyssa Rheingold from the Medical University of South Carolina in the USA says, «Research suggests that risk
factors among patient victims such as substance use, low
socioeconomic status, type of psychopathology, and engagement in behaviours that increase risk could be targeted.
Of clinical significance in terms of helping people with mental illness, the patients» happiness was unrelated to the severity or duration of their illness, to cognitive or physical function or to
socioeconomic factors such as age and education, which
among healthy adults have been linked to a greater sense of well - being.
A new study shows that if
socioeconomic factors related to patients» income and education are taken into account, differences in readmission rates
among hospitals may not be as great as Medicare data indicate.
Further analyses show that graft failure and mortality rates remained higher
among minority groups compared to white children after accounting for differences in demographic, clinical, and
socioeconomic factors.
(JOSE LUIS PELEAZ / GETTY IMAGES) Even though breast cancer incidence rates are slightly lower overall
among African - American women than white women (the incidence is lower still
among Hispanic, Asian, and Native American women), a combination of
socioeconomic factors and unexplained biological differences make the disease more deadly — and in some cases, harder to treat — in the black community.
In fact,
socioeconomic status is the single largest
factor influencing children's school readiness, according to Inequalities at the Starting Gate: Cognitive and Noncognitive Gaps
among the 2010 — 2011 Kindergarten Classmates.
They examined a variety of
factors, such as student gender, age, health,
socioeconomic status, education of parents, whether the school was urban or suburban, the number of years of experience
among teachers, the school's average test performance and the rate of free - or reduced - price lunch program participation.
Effects of
socioeconomic factors on cardiovascular - related symptoms
among residents in Fukushima after the Great East Japan Earthquake: a cross-sectional study using data from the Fukushima Health Management Survey
This interpretation is strengthened by the observation that the associations
among television and children's consumption of fruits, vegetables, and juices; all meats; and pizza, salty snacks, and soda remained statistically significant in the full regression models, where the effects of
socioeconomic and other confounding
factors were controlled.
The effects of place may also vary with individual and households characteristics.2 This is reflected in an urban excess of CMD only
among those who were economically inactive, 51 variation in suicide rates with area level and individual
socioeconomic factors, particularly unemployment, 52,53 and interaction between ethnicity and urban / rural location in the association with depressive symptoms
among those living in poverty in the USA.54 Thus, place may only affect those with specific vulnerabilities.13
Eighty five percent of the sample originally recruited to the Elmira programme had at least 1 to 3 sociodemographic risk
factors, and Olds et al emphasise that most of the positive findings were concentrated
among women who were from low
socioeconomic status households and unmarried.
Indeed, Jay Belsky incorporated all of these risk
factors into his process model of parenting, 11 and data from multiple studies support links to child well - being.12 In an experiment on the effectiveness of a program for low - birth - weight infants, Lawrence Berger and Jeanne Brooks - Gunn examined the relative effect of both
socioeconomic status and parenting on child abuse and neglect (as measured by ratings of health providers who saw children in the treatment and control groups six times over the first three years of life, not by review of administrative data) and found that both
factors contributed significantly and uniquely to the likelihood that a family was perceived to engage in some form of child maltreatment.13 The link between parenting behaviors and child maltreatment suggests that interventions that promote positive parenting behaviors would also contribute to lower rates of child maltreatment
among families served.
In fact, controlling for a broad set of
socioeconomic and relationship
factors, only father doubting the child's paternity significantly predicts the failure to establish paternity
among those at the hospital.
We will assess clinical heterogeneity across studies by examining the distribution of important participant
factors (e.g. age,
socioeconomic status, maternal maltreatment history, caregiver depression) and intervention characteristics (e.g. style, setting, personnel, context of delivery)
among trials.
Although social
factors have been shown to be predictive in other populations and are increasingly being recognised as key determinants of smoking and targets for intervention, 26 the low
socioeconomic status, multiple demographic risk
factors, and high population smoking rates, may render these
factors particularly salient
among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women.
This study assumes that socio - emotional development of infants would be equally affected by different
factors among which is type of feeding in addition to other
factors such as micronutrient adequacy, demographic
factors (as maternal education and
socioeconomic status), and host
factors (as child order of birth).
We have investigated the extent to which interest in attending parenting programmes is determined by
factors such as
socioeconomic status, educational level, and the presence of behaviour problems
among the children, in a survey of a representative sample of parents of 2 — 8 year olds in Oxford.
Prevention efforts have identified a number of within - group contextual
factors involved in the etiology of substance use
among Latino youth including family
socioeconomic status, nativity status, acculturation processes, acculturation stress, and structural barriers.
Among these environmental risk
factors,
socioeconomic disadvantage (SED) has been described as one of the major contributors for the development and persistence of mental health problems [9 — 13].