They show how different ethnicities and
socioeconomic levels perform compared to statewide averages at a given school.
Not exact matches
Companies do better, economies
perform better, and overall
socioeconomic opportunities are better when women compete on the same
level as men.
To me, the biggest issues are the achievement gaps, as you said, and the achievement gaps are still there, according to
socioeconomic background — disadvantaged students are still achieving at a much lower
level than advantaged students or affluent students — and Indigenous students are still
performing at a much lower
level than non-Indigenous, and rural and remote students are still not achieving at the same
levels as metropolitan students.
The resources available for this study ($ 500,000, or roughly $ 8,000 per teacher) would certainly have been more than enough to
perform a rigorous analysis of the performance of National Board teachers vis - à - vis unsuccessful candidates, using a random sample of the two groups and adjusting for students»
socioeconomic status and previous achievement
levels.
Connecticut has the nation's largest achievement gap when it's measured by students»
socioeconomic status, with poor students
performing almost three grade -
levels below their more privileged peers, according to national exams.
In 50 years of evaluation, PCHP has documented important longitudinal impacts for program participants: graduates enter school as well or better prepared than their classmates,
perform significantly better than their
socioeconomic peers and as well as or better than the overall population on school readiness measures in kindergarten and first grade, and are reading and doing math on grade
level in third grade.