The interaction of
sociological theology and ecological theology can lead to an ecologically sensitive
sociological theology and a sociologically sensitive ecological theology.
Even if the philosophical differences are not overcome,
sociological theology and ecological theology need one another.
Sociological theology needs ecological theology in order to widen its horizons to the actual situation of the majority of the human population who face an increasingly desperate and neglected plight in their rural villages.
Because of its tendency to see what is happening now in a temporally extended context, it needs
sociological theology to remind it of the immediate importance of the present suffering of a single child.
The gap between such a new
sociological theology and a new ecological one will be narrowed.
Unless it breaks fundamentally from the Kantian tradition, even an ecologically sensitive
sociological theology can not acknowledge this inherent reality and worth of our fellow creatures.
22 That this is so, and, especially, how this is so, may be clearer from the ecological perspective than from the sociological, but it remains a true and important point about human society, which
sociological theology need not and should not continue to neglect.
Ecological theology needs
sociological theology because left to itself it does not deal realistically with the actual structures of power whose exercise will determine human destiny.
Sociological theology has focused on questions of justice, but as it has recognized that the effects of human beings on their environment are having seriously deleterious consequences for humanity, it has extended its concern to questions of the sustainability of human society.23 Yet in practice the difference of the amount of attention given to these two issues of justice and sustainability still leads to opposing judgements on important issues.
This chapter proposes that the horizons of political theology should be so broadened that it can be formulated as an ecological theology rather than as
a sociological theology.
Not exact matches
The pluralism and relativism built into this
sociological approach are the latest substitutes for the
theology of law and the orders of creation that framed the ethical discussions of the church in the past.
Personally, I've got a better
theology of ministry on Good Friday («Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures»), with all sorts of sound
sociological, psychological reasons for death and defeat, than I have a pastoral
theology robust enough for Easter («He was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures»).
Indeed, a «
sociological imagination» is slowly transforming all
theologies — sometimes with unsettling and explicit power, as in the use of critical social theories in political and liberation
theologies; sometimes with more implicit but no less unsettling effect, as in the increasing use of sociology of knowledge to clarify the actual social settings (or publics) of different
theologies.
His criticism did not focus directly on liberation
theology itself, but on the philosophical Marxism it employs as a
sociological tool.
In his address «Christianity, Marxisn - Liberation
Theology,» prepared for his United States tour this past spring, Pannenberg declared his strong opposition to Marxism and by implication any theology that appeals to Marxism for philosophical or sociological
Theology,» prepared for his United States tour this past spring, Pannenberg declared his strong opposition to Marxism and by implication any
theology that appeals to Marxism for philosophical or sociological
theology that appeals to Marxism for philosophical or
sociological insight.
In fairness to Girard, I must say that he realizes very clearly that the key to the whole problem is found in the Prologue of John, but he writes in the genre of
sociological theory rather than the genre of
theology, which prevents him from speaking as freely as he might of the Incarnation of the Word of God in human history.
As with other fields of
sociological research the question has been asked if there is good enough reason to treat socioreligious phenomena separately instead of handling them in the traditional disciplines (
theology, philosophy, anthropology, etcetera).30 Yet, as against such doubts, the work done by modern scholarship has proved the right to an independent existence of «sociology of religion.»
That several books or bodies of literature of crucial importance for
theology appeared in close proximity to one another still impresses me as coincidental or providential rather than subject to a single
sociological explanation.
But for
sociological reasons that I only vaguely understand,
theology briefly became a public discussion.
(Historical, psychological,
sociological, and phenomenological investigations proceed along descriptive lines; philosophy and
theology are normative.
While the character of certain movements and groups is to a large extent defined by
sociological criteria, such as the earlier so - called Frontier religion or now the Buchmean (Oxford group) Movement, which Allan Eister has recently analyzed in his book Drawing Room Conversion, we find that the more definitely a religious group is a religious group — as distinct from an economic, political, or cultural association — the more important, both for members of the group and students of it, will become its worship and its
theology.
Section III shows that without altogether ceasing to be anthropocentric
sociological theory can become much more sensitive to ecological issues and that ecological
theology needs to be informed by
sociological understanding.
Kaplan's analysis of Jewish nationalism begins with the Bible, the Talmud, the Midrash, and medieval Jewish
theology, while simultaneously freely utilizing modern
sociological and philosophical insights.
If we agree with him, he has given a strong
sociological reason for including
theology in a research university; but the very notion of a research university seems necessarily to exclude
theology.
One can point to the emergence of a variety of critical approaches to religion in general, and to Christianity in particular, which have contributed to the breakdown of certainties: These include historical - critical and other new methods for the study of biblical texts, feminist criticism of Christian history and
theology, Marxist analysis of the function of religious communities, black studies pointing to long - obscured realities,
sociological and anthropological research in regard to cross-cultural religious life, and examinations of traditional teachings by non-Western scholars.
And understanding how
theology can respond to
sociological problems enables us to view the future with hope, as Ellul does.
Seeing the
sociological realities that motivate the author's
theology helps us grasp his emphases.
The tenor of present liberation -
theology reflection is often excoriated as too political or
sociological.
Three Purposes for Sacrifice
Sociological Sacrifice Psychological Sacrifice Spiritual Sacrifice Questioning Sacrifice Traditional Sacrificial
Theology The Bible Undermines Sacrifice The Sacrifice of Jesus The Sacrifice to End All Sacrifices
A succinct theological critique of the
sociological approaches of Hans Mol (classical functionalism), Max Weber (pluralist / symbolic sociology), and Karl Marx (conflict sociology) can be found in Baum's «Three Theses on Contextual
Theology.»