Filed Under: E-Books and Technology for Writers, Self - Publishing, Social Media and Marketing For Writers Tagged With: Big 6 -5-4, Derek Haines, Jane Friedman, Joe Konrath, KDP Select, Kindle Millionaires, Kobo, Kristen McLean, Mark Coker, Meghan Ward, missing Amazon reviews, Smashwords,
sock puppet reviews.
There's been a lot of scandal about
the sock puppet reviews but reviews are still critical because they give your sales page social proof and they feed into the book site algorithms.
Even though Amazon and others have tried to tighten up against
sock puppet reviews, they still happen.
Now if they would just do the same about
the sock puppet reviews...
Not exact matches
How does that compare with making a
sock puppet account or paying a
review service?
Amazon has certainly become a much more crowded space since then, and the
sock puppeting that went on this summer (and news such as John Locke and other authors paying for
reviews) has also made the credibility of Amazon.com
reviews much lower IMHO.
The freak out at
sock -
puppet reviews.
I don't look at 5 - star
reviews for indies, too many
sock puppets.
One thing I want to emphasize, is that in no way was I looking to get bullshit
sock -
puppeted reviews.
Perhaps it was a bigger problem before Amazon's program started removing and blocking most of the shill
reviews and
sock puppets.
It turned out that Duns — author of the Paul Dark series of spy novels for Simon and Schuster — had done some investigative work on a few Amazon
reviews (godspeed, sir, in that abode of the damned) and come up with conclusive proof that bestselling thriller writer R. J. Ellory had engaged in
sock puppeting: using aliases to write positive
reviews on the site for his own books, whilst slamming those of his rivals.
Like that thriller writer who wrote himself 100s of
sock -
puppet reviews.
Let's look at these three areas of policy change:
Sock -
puppet reviews, paid
reviews, and author - to - author
reviews.
Coincidental with the recent
sock -
puppet scandal, Amazon began quietly marching a number of
reviews off the site and into the darkness.
We think of
sock -
puppet reviews as those written by someone using multiple accounts set up under false names for the purposes of generating numerous positive
reviews of his own work, or scathing
reviews of a competitor's work.
Readers are looking for something to help separate the good from the bad and, yes, they know if
reviews are posted by
sock puppets and challenge those
reviews.
Forbes again does a good job in outlining the underlying issue this has created, affectionately known as «
sock puppet»
reviews.
Reviews, especially good ones that aren't obvious sock - puppet reviews will bring in more r
Reviews, especially good ones that aren't obvious
sock -
puppet reviews will bring in more r
reviews will bring in more readers.
Some authors have also used «
sock puppets» — false identities that they create themselves — to post good
reviews they wrote for their own books.
The
sock puppet crap is really what annoys me, some get people with 40K amazon accounts to buy and
review 1000 times over and then buy competitors and post negative
reviews.
Almost any author who is trying to sell books these days has run into the trolls and
sock puppets who seem to spend their days leaving nasty or idiotic
reviews (for books they obviously haven't read) for no particular purpose except to wield the power they probably don't have in their real lives.
In response to my query on how it has handled «
sock puppet»
reviews, Amazon sent me a link to its
review guidelines with no other comment.
It's a violation of the Terms of Service to attempt to artificially inflate a book's
review rankings by creating
sock puppet accounts to leave fake
reviews, or hiring or bartering with others to do the same.
So far, 56 authors — including Laura Lippman, Michael Connelly and Lee Child — have signed this statement vowing they'll never create «
sock puppet»
reviews.
Not to mention the recent hoopla about
sock -
puppet reviews on Amazon and authors buying
reviews (like John Locke supposedly did — all 300 of them or so people say...)
The paid
review and
sock -
puppet review scandals that rocked Amazon this summer after revelations by Locke — and an embarrassing number of others — have resulted in a draconian crackdown on all Amazon
reviews.
They claim this is because their TOS guidelines ban
reviewing by a «competitor,» and this protects against attacks on rivals by
sock puppets.
That's rich coming from a guy who phoned in his Steyn
review with nothing to back him up but an ugly misogynist
sock puppet.