Sentences with phrase «soft bigotry of low expectations»

This rationing of education and soft bigotry of low expectations for poor and minority kids would eventually trickle down into the rest of American public education in the form of ability - tracking and even special education.

Yet, this is only a TV show, and these are only community college students — not to follow George W. Bush's «soft bigotry of low expectations.»

It's this hypocrisy that is the soft bigotry of low expectations.»

For years, education was set back by the soft bigotry of low expectations — the idea that the most disadvantaged children shouldn't be expected to achieve the best results.

Bush and congressional Republicans called for an end to the «soft bigotry of low expectations» and a focus on achievement outcomes.

Can't people speak such truths without being accused of giving «excuses» or practicing «the soft bigotry of low expectations»?

Commentators like Mike Petrilli are right to point out the risk, then, that making it impossible to fail reeks of the «soft bigotry of low expectations.»

In the 2000 election, President Bush's pledge to combat the «soft bigotry of low expectations» was a pillar of his compassionate conservatism and crucial to his razor - thin margin of victory.

«We need to challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations.

She criticizes George W. Bush for worrying about the «soft bigotry of low expectations.»

President George W. Bush famously criticized the «soft bigotry of low expectations» in support of his education - reform agenda.

While some may argue that creating separate accountability frameworks for alternative schools is unfair to the students that they serve — another example of the soft bigotry of low expectations — the current situation is untenable.

Perhaps the intentions behind these policies are pure, but they amount to the soft bigotry of low expectations when it comes to student effort and responsibility.

Jeb Bush is the leader in a movement that promotes the «soft bigotry of low expectations.»

A dozen years after standing with President George W. Bush to issue in a new era of federal accountability with the passage of No Child Left Behind, conservatives in the House and Senate removed substantive federal carrots and sticks that were credited with shining a spotlight on the «soft bigotry of low expectations.»

The «soft bigotry of low expectations,» prevalent in many troubled urban schools, has no place in Catholic education.

To call this goal unrealistic is to abandon millions of children to what President Bush has so aptly termed the soft bigotry of low expectations.

It is the «soft bigotry of low expectations» President Bush so rightly decried.

Some minority parents agree, asserting that lower standards for their children is a form of prejudice, the «soft bigotry of low expectations» as former President George W. Bush called it.

«It reflects this soft bigotry of low expectations around student effort and student behavior,» said Michael Petrilli, president of the Fordham Institute, a right - leaning think tank.

No Child Left Behind, which had strong bipartisan backing when it passed in 2001, was the signature education initiative of George W. Bush, who said the failure of public schools to teach poor students and minorities reflected the «soft bigotry of low expectations.»

And I'm far from alone in believing that this soft bigotry of low expectations will prove yet another impediment for students who are eligible for special education services.

In 2001, President George W. Bush led a bi-partisan group of policymakers, including Senator Edward Kennedy, to address this phenomenon, what he termed the «soft bigotry of low expectations.»

ConnCAN CEO Jennifer Alexander with a great piece on CT Viewpoints today: Soft bigotry of low expectations has no place in Connecticut.

The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations X. I Want My Kids to Fail

The ditching of AYP (along with allowing states to replace the 100 percent proficiency provision with Plessy v. Ferguson - like targets) has allowed states and districts to go back to subjecting poor and minority kids to the soft bigotry of low expectations.

The «soft bigotry of low expectations» has been replaced with an emphasis on student achievement for all students by requiring the disaggregation of performance data by race, gender, and socioeconomic status.

And that's not good for Obama, Duncan or their respective legacies, which have already been stained by their move to allow for states to embrace what predecessor George W. Bush called the soft bigotry of low expectations for poor and minority kids.

More outcry is likely to come in the coming months as reformers and civil rights activists in D.C., Tennessee and other states learn how the waiver gambit has essentially allowed states to damn children through the soft bigotry of low expectations.

Without that right to school choice, Jonah might have been relegated to a system that placed an unwarranted ceiling on his potential or, to use a loaded phrase, stifled his growth through the «soft bigotry of low expectations.»

«The national objective is to challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations and to raise the standards for every single child,» says Bush.

President George W. Bush meaningfully described this phenomenon of setting different standards for certain kids as «the soft bigotry of low expectations.»

Division leaders understood the soft bigotry of low expectations and the calamitous result it could have on their minority and other underserved students.

Many people (including influential educators) still think that a large Pygmalion effect is out there, waiting to be tapped if only we can get teachers to shed «the soft bigotry of low expectations,» as the rhetoric of No Child Left Behind puts it.

After teaching with the CCSS for two years, I am confident they will make a positive difference in Mississippi, where flimsy, ambiguous standards have long allowed schools to skate by on what George W. Bush famously called «the soft bigotry of low expectations.»

The new President, George W. Bush, charged educators with embracing the «soft bigotry of low expectations,» saying, in effect, that they had accepted the money but had never actually expected low - income, minority and handicapped students to perform much better.

Former President George W. Bush used to use that great phrase, «the soft bigotry of low expectations.»

This is the «soft bigotry of low expectations» in action.

The failing teacher likely succumbed to «the soft bigotry of low expectations.»

But in the United States over the past decade, it became fashionable among supporters of the «no excuses» approach to school improvement to accuse anyone raising the poverty issue of letting schools off the hook — or what Mr. Bush famously called «the soft bigotry of low expectations.»

President Bush used the phrase «soft bigotry of low expectations» as a way to explain the need for this legislation, which required all states to see whether their students were meeting the standards of their states.

«I fear that the soft bigotry of low expectations is returning, and for the sake of America's children, that is something we can not allow.