This rationing of education and
soft bigotry of low expectations for poor and minority kids would eventually trickle down into the rest of American public education in the form of ability - tracking and even special education.
This isn't to say that these officials don't care about these children, but that they are disinterested in taking on the tough work needed to overhaul districts and schools in order provide kids with the schools they deserve — which includes challenging
the soft bigotry of low expectations for poor and minority kids held by far too many adults working in American public education in Virginia and the rest of the nation, and the affiliates of the National Education Association which has succeeded for so long in keeping the Old Dominion's status quo quite ante.
But the fact that the Obama administration granted Virginia a waiver in the first place in spite of its record of obstinacy on systemic reform, along with the fact that many of the 32 other states granted waivers (along with the District of Columbia) have also set low expectations for districts and schools to improve the achievement of the poor and minority kids in their care, has put President Obama in the uncomfortable position of supporting
the soft bigotry of low expectations for children — especially those who share his race and skin color.
Not exact matches
Bush and congressional Republicans called
for an end to the «
soft bigotry of low expectations» and a focus on achievement outcomes.
While some may argue that creating separate accountability frameworks
for alternative schools is unfair to the students that they serve — another example
of the
soft bigotry of low expectations — the current situation is untenable.
Some minority parents agree, asserting that
lower standards
for their children is a form
of prejudice, the «
soft bigotry of low expectations» as former President George W. Bush called it.
And I'm far from alone in believing that this
soft bigotry of low expectations will prove yet another impediment
for students who are eligible
for special education services.
The «
soft bigotry of low expectations» has been replaced with an emphasis on student achievement
for all students by requiring the disaggregation
of performance data by race, gender, and socioeconomic status.
# 25: Aaron Sams on 5 Ideas to Master Technology and not let it master you
for 5 Idea Friday 3/3/17 # 24: Anael Alston on «The
Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations»
for Thought - Leader Thursday 3/2/17 # 23: Micki Uppena on Creating a Student Centered Library Where Kids Love to Learn
for Wonderful Wednesday 3/1/17 # 22: Chad Lehman What to buy
for your maker space
for Tech Tool Tuesday 2/28/17 # 21: Todd Nesloney on Reaching Struggling Kids
for #MondayMotivation 2/27/17
«The national objective is to challenge the
soft bigotry of low expectations and to raise the standards
for every single child,» says Bush.
President George W. Bush meaningfully described this phenomenon
of setting different standards
for certain kids as «the
soft bigotry of low expectations.»
President Bush used the phrase «
soft bigotry of low expectations» as a way to explain the need
for this legislation, which required all states to see whether their students were meeting the standards
of their states.
«I fear that the
soft bigotry of low expectations is returning, and
for the sake
of America's children, that is something we can not allow.
No Child Left Behind, on the books since 2002, was supposed to close achievement gaps
for disadvantaged students (racial and ethnic minorities,
low - income students, youngsters with special needs and English learners) and to eliminate what President George W. Bush decried as «the
soft bigotry of low expectations.»
[Update: Katie Haycock
of the Education Trust (which has gotten into trouble
for its role in helping the administration define proficiency down as well as developing the Plessy v. Ferguson - like Cut the Gap in Half approach that is subjecting poor and minority kids to the
soft bigotry of low expectations), is now going to say that she doesn't like the direction
of of the administration's gambit; EdTrust has also released a report criticizing the effort thus far.]