Sentences with phrase «soft goal»

The problem for me is not that we let a lead slip against the French champions, even though it was a very soft goal that you could say was a bit unlucky.

But it does not mean we should not looking at our defence issues, letting in 2 soft goals like last game is absolutely not acceptable.

He lets in way too many soft goals, but we usually lead already so its not a big deal.

What we should not expect is to keep giving soft goals away at the other end and that is our big problem.

Whatever wrong decisions were made in the match we shouldn't have conceded that soft goal from set piece.

He has let in number of soft goals recently.

He won't be able to get away with allowing soft goals and continuing to start.

My dog will chew for a little while but once it gets a little soft her goal is to swallow it whole.

At the same time, «serious consideration» is a pretty soft goal that still leaves possible rejection on the table.

In his first 5 games he barely had a save to make and he's let in way too many soft goals.

Conceding soft goals like the third one was a big blow.

Saturdays score is no surprise to me, scoring goals for fun also conceding stupid goals unnecessarily should be the norm, we play like the way we did Saturday week and week out (apart from Bournemouth) but usually the goals just don't go in, lets hope with the new additions we can rectify scoring more goals but we will continue to let in soft goals in to our net

Scoring lots of goals is not the only way to win matches - stop shipping soft goals - show some fight - defend collectively and keep clean sheets: Believe me we won't need a Cavani to win matches then.

Arsene continues to send us out unbalanced and with the wrong tactics, and we continue to conceded soft goals on the break or on set pieces, and don't maximize our ability going forward.

Similarly we tend to overcommit and then get punished on the counter or concede soft goals because we're not use to playing without the ball.

Pekka Rinne's regression to the norm continued as he allowed a reasonably soft goal to Rickard Rakell to open the scoring for Anaheim.

I agree, WS would have probably saved that one — problem is I said Ospina would have saved that soft goal WS let squeeze past him versus Reading.

Why are you not saying the same about Dortmund considering how soft the goals they conceded were.

1 mistake doesn't make for a bad goalkeeper (not saying he's bad) but no super saves and soft goals going in?

But from the moment they lost to Hull City on the opening fixture of the season to two rather soft goals, it really hasn't felt the same.

Arsenal lost their first match of the season against Chelsea after two soft goals made the difference between a loss... Read More»

Manchester United's man between the sticks came under heavy criticism recently as he conceded, what many saw as, two soft goals as Spain were beaten by Croatia at Euro 2016.

So it appears that the players are confident that we will score and so can be more patient and make sure that we do not make any mistakes and give away soft goals at the other end.

That and letting soft goals in.

A striker OR a CB / CDM so we can either out - score the oppositions and sack off the clean sheets, OR stop conceding soft goals and go back to good old 1 - 0 Arsenal tactics.

Weak teams ship soft goals.

this last season we let in so many soft goals from set peaces i think Granit Xhaka was brought in for that reason

Not that Ospina hasn't either but he's just not on their level and still lets in soft goals, same as Szczesny.

Both the goals that Watford scored were soft goals and this happens — even to the best of teams.

I do fear that there'll be moments when we leak a soft goal or two, just as he's getting the plaudits, and then we'd be saying that we should've used him ourselves.

what a soft goal that was!

Soft goals conceded once more.

On Sunday night Marc - Andre Fleury remained red - hot, Jonathan Quick let in a soft goal that seemed like window dressing at the time, but proved to be the game - winner and the Golden Knights clamped down in the final moments to win a third - straight one - goal game.

He will have to get used to our defenders not doing what Chelsea defenders did, because unfortunately you can see more goals «soft goals» gifted by our defenders, it happens every season, we give around 10 + goals away easily in the league.

Hometown crowds would serenade him when he gave up soft goals and at one point he found himself back in the American Hockey League on a conditioning stint.

England in the big tournaments always look so sluggish, they concede soft goals and they seems so nervous.

Unfortunately for Szczesny the same can't be said after letting a soft goal like that in.

However, the rest of the defenders with the exception of Nelson are too casual hence Conceding very soft goals.

But I can not be happy with Gareth Southgate for taking Chambers and not using him at all, especially when their defending was not great, as seen by them letting in three soft goals in the defeat to Italy last night.

I don't know about tactics but then... Squillaci also talked about our approach and our the way we set up to always attack, thereby conceding soft goals, he even said he discussed it with Wenger and he said that's how he wants us to play...

Mourinho was aware that he needed those players to win the bpl, same story with us this coming season, we need to replace our gk (last night ospina let in another soft goal due to his lack of height) peter cech / kondogbia or wanayama / cavani or benzema or higuain.

Though letting in soft goals has been... Food for thought

On defense, the unbelievable number of mistakes and soft goals.

Yes Man City lost away to Chelsea but they played very well and were unlucky, whereas Klopp's team were not so good and their defensive frailties were on show again as Bournemouth pinched two soft goals to earn a point at Anfield.

It was a soft goal dat we conceded.

Holtby hasn't had a game with out a soft goal in a month?