Their abstract says «energy budget calculations show that poleward atmospheric energy transport increases more in solar forcing compared to equivalent CO2 forcing simulations, which is in line with the identified strong increase in large - scale precipitation in
solar forcing scenarios.»
Not exact matches
Santer et al in the PNAS paper also provide some additional tests in examining
scenarios with much greater
solar and volcanic
forcings than observed in the real world.
They maintain that the actual
forcings (which includes things other than just CO2) are closest to Hansen's
scenario B. Remember this wasn't an exercise in predicting future CO2, methane,
solar, volcanic, etc.
forcings, but a prediction of what could happen under some hypothetical «high», «medium» and «low»
forcing scenarios.
It may well be the case that only the systems that produce
forcings eg volcanic eruption,
solar winds, sunspot activity and the like could be non ergodic but still capable of yielding
scenarios for climate modelling purposes.
Figure 2: Global mean temperature anomalies 1900 to 2100 relative to the period 1961 to 1990 for the A1B (red lines) and A2 (magenta lines)
scenarios and for three different
solar forcings corresponding to a typical 11 - year cycle (solid line) and to a new Grand Minimum with
solar irradiance corresponding to recent reconstructions of Maunder - minimum irradiance (dashed line) and a lower irradiance (dotted line), respectively.
The larger the MWP temperature rise in this
scenario, the larger the TCR, and the same feedbacks both positive and negative will operate for
solar and CO2
forcing.
The influence of reduced
solar forcing (grand
solar minimum or geoengineering
scenarios like
solar radiation management) on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is assessed in an ensemble of atmosphere — ocean — chemistry — climate model simulations.
Well, there is a lot of magical thinking built into the models, from unrealistic emission
scenarios that disregard proven fossil fuel reserves, to made up sensitivity values from overestimated aerosol
forcings and underestimated
solar forcings, and made up feedbacks.
[1] AR4 Chapter 2: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative
Forcing 2.7.1.3 Indirect Effects of
Solar Variability «Various scenarios have been proposed whereby solar - induced galactic cosmic ray fluctuations might influence climate (as surveyed by Gray et al., 2005).&r
Solar Variability «Various
scenarios have been proposed whereby
solar - induced galactic cosmic ray fluctuations might influence climate (as surveyed by Gray et al., 2005).&r
solar - induced galactic cosmic ray fluctuations might influence climate (as surveyed by Gray et al., 2005).»