Sceptical scientists and climate realists, contest natural variation;
solar magnetic effects, volcanic eruptions, solar irradiance, ozone depletion, ocean currents PDO / AMO, clouds, all play a much more significant role in the climate system.
Not exact matches
Earth's
magnetic field and atmosphere protect us on the ground from most of the harmful
effects of space weather, but astronauts in low - Earth orbit — or even, one day, in interplanetary space — are more exposed to space weather, including bursts of fast - moving particles called
solar energetic particles, or SEPs.
Imagine being able to monitor the progress of an entire
solar storm from the time it erupts from our sun until it sweeps past our small planet
effecting enormous changes in our
magnetic field.
Any
solar effect (either direct or indirect) which is correlated to
solar activity (i.e.
solar irradiance,
solar magnetic field [and thus galactic cosmic rays], ultraviolet [UV] radiation, etc.) is accounted for in the linear regression.
On the other hand, if
solar magnetic fields have an
effect, then shouldn't we see correlations between climates of Earth & Mars?
The ultraviolet Hubble data was captured after astronomers detected powerful
solar winds heading towards Uranus, and tasked the telescope with observing the
effects on the planet's atmosphere and
magnetic field
C. Carreau, ASPERA - 4 & MAG teams, Venus Express, ESA Annotated image illustrating loss of hydrogen through plasma wake Venus may have lost oceans of water due to a runaway greenhouse
effect which evaporated water into the upper atmosphere, where ultraviolet light dissociated water into ionized atomic hydrogen and oxygen (some later incorporated into carbon dioxide) that were blown away by the
Solar wind due to the lack of a strong
magnetic field like the Earth's (more).
«Any noise in the system — pressure created by
solar radiation, thermal,
magnetic and gravitational
effects — could perturb the gravitational wave,» ESA project scientist Paul McNamara explained via a Skype call last week.
What are the climatic
effects of a diminished
solar wind and interplanetary
magnetic field?
On the other hand, if
solar magnetic fields have an
effect, then shouldn't we see correlations between climates of Earth & Mars?
Many of science does not include the difference in the circumference of the equator to the poles, circular motion and the deflection of
solar energy off a moving object, the energy difference of compression which has a huge impact to the atmosphere and under the planet's surface (centrifugal force), the possibility of two
magnetic fields, the force of the sun's
magnetic field in the sequence to the planets circular motion (bugs on the windshield
effect), etc. etc. etc..
These cycles also
effects of the geo /
solar magnetic coupling (the
effect on cosmic rays for example) for example, and they have little understanding of that as well.
That is, climate models that do not include
solar factors like
magnetic fields,
solar winds, cosmic rays,
solar spectral changes, or lunar
effects are able to -LSB-...]
According to a study in Geographical Research, the droughts are related to the
solar magnetic phases and not the greenhouse
effect.
WAnted to ask have you guys looked into
solar maximum and
solar flares
effecting the earth's
magnetic fields so this may be causing some problems with the dophins sonar regulations?
However, we conclude that the imprint of this Modern Maximum (e.g. Earth climate forcing) would essentially result from time - integration
effects (system inertia), since exceptionally high amplitudes of the
solar magnetic cycle can not be invoked anymore.
«Just how large this role is, must still be investigated, since, according to our latest knowledge on the variations of the
solar magnetic field, the significant increase in the Earth's temperature since 1980 is indeed to be ascribed to the greenhouse
effect caused by carbon dioxide,»
Earth
magnetic change exists, sunspot number is the representative of the
solar magnetic changes, it is fact that both react on the oceans, the physics is certain, so
effect of one can be modulated by or added to the other, only degree of intensity is questionable.
vukcevic December 12, 2012 at 2:46 pm Reply Earth
magnetic change exists, sunspot number is the representative of the
solar magnetic changes, it is fact that both react on the oceans, the physics is certain But not on each other, and their impact on the oceans is too small and short - lived [hours for the
solar part] to have any significant
effect on anything.
Whatever the contribution of
solar variability to LOD is, it does not change the fact that outer planets can not affect the inner
solar system trough
magnetic fields because the plasma of the
solar wind makes the
magnetic effects unidirectional.
When it is noticed that Venus is potentially losing its Atmosphere at a rate related to overall gravity well determinations and the Atmospheric density is potentially due to loss of a planetary «
magnetic dipole» with then a relationship linking the notice of which «Planets» in this
Solar System present «Earth - like Dipoles», the CONTINUANCE of «life as we know it» is NOT in any study of a supposed «greenhouse
effect» or even other Planet's Atmospheres.
The planets may have a spin - orbit coupling
effect on the Sun which affects its rotation rate, which would then affect the
solar dynamo and sunspot production, and therefore the build up of
magnetic flux at the poles, and the length of a
solar cycle: if the
solar cycle is weaker with less sunspots, it'll take longer for the build up of opposing flux to reach the point when it flips the poles.
This makes the most sense because the sun drives the climate and the geo
magnetic field can enhance or diminish given
solar effects depending on if it is in phase or out of phase with
solar.
For some unexplained reason there have been a large number of coronal holes on the surface of the sun, in low latitude positions during
solar magnetic cycle 24, however due to the reduction in the
solar wind density the
solar wind bursts have less
effect on cloud modulation which explains why there has suddenly be an increase sea ice in the Antarctic, a recovery of sea ice in the Arctic, and an inhibiting of the formation of El Niño events.
Up until Svensmark's work, there were inadequate explanations for some of the
effects we have seen in terms of cloud variability and especially with its association with
solar magnetic activity.
Because I was thinking that in the eastward and westward drift of the
magnetic equator, might be some other drifts and a relaxing of polar fields with a trickle down
effect during times of lower
solar wind dynamic pressures.
A more nuanced understanding of
solar and
magnetic effects may well do.
loltwat, that changes in
solar magnetic activity have a profound
effect on temperature which even you can see.
As a result they have a direct
effect on the weather of all the planets in our
solar system, and the Earth's own
magnetic field.
Clouds» impact on climate would obviously change as the world warms (a feedback) but, if
solar -
magnetic effects change clouds, as now seems likely, clouds could also drive climate change (a forcing).6, 7
Over on http://www.solarham.com, we have been discussiing for years the
effect of a potential
solar magnetic minimum; whether such a minimum presages cooler global temperautures.
Effect on Polar atmospheric oscillations of large
solar events and consequent changes in the interplanetary
magnetic field.
During this prolonged
solar minimum the earth's
magnetic field will be weaker then what it was during the Dalton or Maunder Minimums, which will compound
solar effects, from this prolonged
solar minimum period.
Any
solar effect (either direct or indirect) which is correlated to
solar activity (i.e.
solar irradiance,
solar magnetic field [and thus galactic cosmic rays], ultraviolet [UV] radiation, etc.) is accounted for in the linear regression.
The most likely candidate for that climatic variable force that comes to mind is
solar variability (because I can think of no other force that can change or reverse in a different trend often enough, and quick enough to account for the historical climatic record) and the primary and secondary
effects associated with this
solar variability which I feel are a significant player in glacial / inter-glacial cycles, counter climatic trends when taken into consideration with these factors which are, land / ocean arrangements, mean land elevation, mean
magnetic field strength of the earth (
magnetic excursions), the mean state of the climate (average global temperature), the initial state of the earth's climate (how close to interglacial - glacial threshold condition it is) the state of random terrestrial (violent volcanic eruption, or a random atmospheric circulation / oceanic pattern that feeds upon itself possibly) / extra terrestrial events (super-nova in vicinity of earth or a random impact) along with Milankovitch Cycles.
The reversal of
magnetic field strength from one
solar hemisphere to the other may have significant
effects on cosmic ray modulation, for example.
All of this in combination with a weakening geo
magnetic field which should compound given
solar effects.
Who is to say that the
effects of the polarity reversal of the Sun's
magnetic field (marking
Solar Cycle 24's midpoint) will not act in concert with other natural forces to amplify the
effects of the Sun on the Earth's future climate in ways we can not comprehend?
Magnetic field indices derived from synoptic magnetograms of the Mt. Wilson Observatory, i.e.
Magnetic Plage Strength Index (MPSI) and Mt. Wilson Sunspot Index (MWSI), are used to study the
effects of surface magnetism on total
solar irradiance variability during
solar cycles 21, 22 and 23.
But of course, if you ignore the COMPLETE
solar spectrum, I guess you can (need to) ignore the
effect changes in the earth's
magnetic flux would have on that radiation.
High
solar activity means a stronger heliospheric
magnetic field and thus a more efficient screen against GCR, then under the hypothesis underlined above, the reduced GCR flux would promote less clouds amplifying the warming
effect expected from high
solar activity.
There is a discernible repeating pattern in the weather data, due to the Lunar declinational atmospheric tides that, also shows recognizable patterns of interference, that leaves the Earth homopolar
effects mechanism, modulated electromagnetically from the
effects of Earth passing through the concentrated
magnetic field flux, extending from the sun out to that outer planet, that defines the pattern of
magnetic field coupling of the
solar wind into and through the magnetically permeable content of each planet.
«A dramatic and surprising
magnetic effect of light discovered by University of Michigan researchers could lead to
solar power without traditional semiconductor - based
solar cells.