There were prime borrowers who were
sold subprime mortgages simply because there was an incentive for the broker to do so.
Brokers were paid higher commissions to
sell subprime mortgages than prime mortgages.
Not exact matches
Back in 2010 it paid $ 550 million to settle charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that it mislead investors into buying a so - called synthetic collateralized debt obligation named Abacus, which was made up of a bundle of financial instruments tied to
subprime mortgage bonds, many of which plummeted in value shortly after the deal was
sold.
It owned office buildings and stores; financed supermarkets, fast - food franchises, and other mid-market businesses; loaned money to consumers;
sold insurance; and at one time even made
subprime mortgages.
It got into trouble by
selling guarantees on
mortgage securities that forced it to pay billions of dollars after the
subprime mortgage bubble burst in 2007.
Around the time that the bank agreed in 2010 to pay $ 550 million to settle charges it improperly
sold a product linked to
subprime mortgages, chairman and Chief Executive Blankfein launched a global review to strengthen the firm's practices and culture.
So with poetic justice, it was in the same position as the
subprime borrowers whose junk
mortgages it had underwritten and
sold to investors gullible enough to believe Moody's and Standard and Poor's AAA ratings.
He devises a way to bet against the housing market, to buy
subprime mortgages to
sell short.
With
subprime, they were able to spread that risk by
selling the
mortgages on the secondary market.
«University administrators are the equivalent of
subprime mortgage brokers,» he says, «
selling you a story that you should go into debt massively, that it's not a consumption decision, it's an investment decision.
But by
selling the
subprime loans through the secondary
mortgage market, the lenders were able to «offload» the risk associated with those loans.
And in a flashback to the
subprime mortgage boom, P2P startups have begun bundling and
selling off loans through securitizations.
«Isnâ $ ™ t the packaging of
mortgages and
selling them to investors one of the reasons we got into the
subprime mess?
Big Wall Street banks package
subprime mortgages into securities and
sell them to hedge funds and institutional investors looking for high yielding assets.
Much like
mortgages,
subprime auto loans go through Wall Street's securitization machine: Once lenders make the loans, they pool thousands of them into bonds that are
sold in slices to investors like mutual funds, pensions and hedge funds.
And, like
subprime mortgages before the financial crisis, many
subprime auto loans are bundled into complex bonds and
sold as securities by banks to insurance companies, mutual funds and public pension funds — a process that creates ever - greater demand for loans.
2) Wall Street spends millions of dollars doing credit checks and filling out ISDA agreements before entering swap transactions with customers... and yet, no one blinked at the idea of
selling a
subprime borrower a receiver swap — allowing them to pay floating instead of fixed rates on their
mortgage.
They allow traders to package emissions permits into complex financial products and
sell them in bundles — much like they did with
subprime mortgages.
Anyway, we're back at it again, except this time instead of
subprime mortgages being
sold to baby boomers it's $ 400 pants being
sold to millennials.
(Bloomberg)-- U.S. prosecutors have abandoned their case against Angelo Mozilo, a leader in
selling the risky
subprime mortgages that fueled the financial crisis, after a two - year quest to bring a civil suit against him...
Because the interest rates on
subprime loans were much higher than prime loans,
subprime mortgages were «securitized» and
sold on Wall Street.
But if you
sold subprime, er, I mean, affordable
mortgages, you had a helluva lot less competition so for years you could
sell more
mortgages and, in addition, charge higher fees.
During the boom, loan officers could make 2 to 3 times more money
selling one
subprime mortgage versus one prime
mortgage.
If everyone is
selling prime
mortgages, there's more money in
selling something more unique like affordable /
subprime mortgages.
The reason the number of affordable /
subprime mortgages skyrocketed during the boom was because lower lending standards mean more people can get
mortgages and that means
mortgage companies can
sell more
mortgages.
«By and large, the ARM market was polluted by the abuses that went on with
subprime mortgages,» said Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside
Mortgage Finance, adding that «prime»
mortgages sold to borrowers with solid credit histories tend to have much clearer terms.
Driven by Wall Street's demand for
subprime loans to securitize and
sell to investors, lenders
sold high - risk products such as exploding adjustable - rate
mortgages — loans with interest rates that could triple after two years — and liar loans, also known as stated income loans, which required little or no documentation about income, assets, or credit history.