Sentences with phrase «sole prerogative»
The phrase "sole prerogative" means having the exclusive right or power to do something. It suggests that only one person or entity has the authority to make decisions or take certain actions. Full definition
«Fred Phelps has health issues,» the church said in a statement Sunday, «but the idea that someone would suggest that he is near death, is not only highly speculative, but foolish considering that all such matters are the sole prerogative of God.»
religion.blogs.cnn.com
That is the sole prerogative of clergy.
«but the idea that someone would suggest that he is near death, is not only highly speculative, but foolish considering that all such matters are the sole prerogative of God.»
From Monday's article: «Fred Phelps has health issues,» the church said in a statement Sunday, «but the idea that someone would suggest that he is near death, is not only highly speculative, but foolish considering that all such matters are the sole prerogative of God.»
Faith is not the sole prerogative of any one cultural tradition, though Christians have often shown a tendency to think faith was exclusively a Christian phenomenon.
«I don't have a problem with the legislature setting up committees and naming chairmen [previously the sole prerogative of legislature chairmen] but I think a so - called rail corridor committee should have more members from the corridor on it.»
Appointments are the sole prerogative of the president who knows who is best for which job to help his administration.
Taylor identified the «organisation of work being the sole prerogative of management» (Stoney, 2001, p. 33).
It is clear that the Electrabel tribunal's use of EU law is poles apart from e.g. the Maffezini tribunal's engagement, and its discussion on the division of competences between the EU and its member states is problematic in light of Opinions 1/91 and 2/13, where the Court explicitly stated that questions of competence are its sole prerogative.
But it is the judge's sole prerogative to instruct the jury in the law.
No damages were awarded for this breach, however, because the judge held that according to the House of Lords ruling in Johnson v Unisys [2001] ICR 480, [2001] All ER (D) 274 (Mar) if the loss was caused by the dismissal, any claim was the sole prerogative of the law of unfair dismissal and not the common law.