Sentences with phrase «sole responsibility for a child»

Is it strictly a family matter, wherein the parents have sole responsibility for their children's mental health, or should schools also play a prominent role in suicide prevention?

Once a child begins school, parents face letting go of the sole responsibility for their child's learning.

In a joint custody arrangement, parents share physical and / or legal custody of a child; whereas, in a full custody arrangement, one parent has sole responsibility for a child.

Having sole responsibility for your children and household can be hard.

Not exact matches

Just FYI, the sole responsibility for raising children lies with the parents.

When a congregation has social networks in which intergenerational relationships are possible, parents are relieved of sole responsibility for the faith of their children.

• Reducing mothers» sole responsibility for infants and young children through more active paternal care, and supporting mothers to interact with adults outside the child - rearing arena (for example, in employment) are likely to contribute to better mental health among mothers and reduced parenting stress (Hrdy, 2009 — pp 168 - 171).

An order for joint custody may specify one home as the primary residence of the child and designate one parent to have sole power to make decisions regarding specific matters while both parents retain equal rights and responsibilities for other matters.

It's unrealistic to expect a child, regardless of age, to have sole responsibility for caring for a dog.

(1) «Joint custody» means both parents have equal rights and responsibilities for major decisions concerning the child, including the child's education, medical and dental care, extracurricular activities, and religious training; however, a judge may designate one parent to have sole authority to make specific, identified decisions while both parents retain equal rights and responsibilities for all other decisions.

There are two types of legal custody: (i) «sole legal custody» refers to when only one of the parents has these rights; and (ii) «joint legal custody» is where both parents have the same rights and responsibilities for the major decisions for the child.

With sole custody, one parent (custodial parent) will have the responsibility for making all major decisions involving the child.

If awarded sole legal custody, one parent holds the exclusive responsibility for «decisions relating to the health, education, and welfare of a child.»

The court may award joint custody, where the parents share decision - making for the children, or sole custody, one parent having control over and parental responsibility for the care, upbringing and education of the child.

In this aspect women in particular (thanks to Gardners sterotyping) are told to leave their abusers and are supported therein, but as soon as it happens and they are fighting for sole parental responsibilities to protect their child from exploitation and as a proxy for continued abuse, they are labeled «mother gaters» or alienators.

Section 61.13 of the Florida Statutes advises that a judge can only grant a request for sole parental responsibility if joint decision making would be detrimental to a child.

The first is a sole custody arrangement in which the child lives with the parent who has the responsibility for providing daily childcare and making decisions about the child's religion, schooling, and medical care.

Possessory Conservatorship — In Texas, possessory conservatorship refers to the child custody arrangement in which one parent by agreement or by court order is given some rights in a child's upbringing, when the other parent is designated as sole managing conservator and has the primary responsibility for a child or children after a divorce.

If the court determines that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental responsibility and make such arrangements for time - sharing as specified in the parenting plan as will best protect the child or abused spouse from further harm.

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — With whom a child shall live — Where there are competing applications for the care of the children by the maternal grandmother, the maternal grandmother's former de-facto partner and the maternal great aunt and uncle — Where the children's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt aCHILDREN — With whom a child shall live — Where there are competing applications for the care of the children by the maternal grandmother, the maternal grandmother's former de-facto partner and the maternal great aunt and uncle — Where the children's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren by the maternal grandmother, the maternal grandmother's former de-facto partner and the maternal great aunt and uncle — Where the children's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren shall live with the maternal aunt and uncle

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — with whom the child lives — where there are allegations the father and paternal grandmother sexually abused the child — whether there is an unacceptable risk of harm to the child in the father's care — where the child has speech and language delays — where the child had spent unsupervised time with the father after separation — where the parties entered into final Consent Orders in October 2015 — where the allegations arose after that — where the child has been spending supervised time with the father since October 2016 — where the mother obtained a domestic violence protection order against the father in 2015 — where an order for equal shared parental responsibility is not in the child's best interests — where an unacceptable risk of harm is not found — where the mother is granted sole parental responsibility — where the child will continue to live primarily with the mother and spend unsupervised time with the father on an increasing basis

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Parenting — Parental responsibility — With whom the children shall live and spend time — Separation of siblings — Where the two eldest children have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tCHILDREN — Parenting — Parental responsibility — With whom the children shall live and spend time — Separation of siblings — Where the two eldest children have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren shall live and spend time — Separation of siblings — Where the two eldest children have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirteen.

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thCHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the mother

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered for the child to spend no time with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.

However, the court will award sole decision - making responsibility to one parent if it finds a shared arrangement is not in the child's best interests, for example, when there is a history of abuse.

Both parents maintain equal rights and responsibilities, but the court may appoint one parent to have a sole capacity to make certain decisions for the best interest of the child.

A legally ordered arrangement, for parents who do not live together, by which neither parent is considered the sole custodial parent but equally share the rights and responsibilities for raising the child (ren).

Authorised carers can apply for «sole parental responsibility» for a child or young person who has been in their care for two years or more.

Authorised carers now have the option to apply for sole parental responsibility for children and young people who have been in their care for two years or more.

If a parent is granted «sole» parental rights and responsibilities, she is responsible for providing a home for the child and making decisions concerning his welfare, such as decisions about education, health and religion.

In the most severe cases, the court will grant sole custody of the child to the other parent and not allow any parenting or visitation time for the impaired parent, until such time as that parent can demonstrate an ability to appropriately exercise such parenting time or responsibilities.