Sentences with phrase «solutions than the court»

It can enable more creative, tailor - made solutions than the court process allows.

Agreements in mediation often contain more creative and personal solutions than a court would allow.

Mediation can be a better solution than court as it often results in a more beneficial outcome for both parties.

I suggest that mediation may be a better solution than court.

Not exact matches

you can have a court system that is supposed to deal non-violently with solutions to these dillimmas but mostely it is entertainment and laughable in it's core justice to begin with humans are human so how does the newer muslim prophet propose to become more than human in response to violence and as a tool for enactment for change — if necessary?

ADR also can allow the parties to develop a more flexible or creative solution than is generally possible in court or formal hearings and appeals.

The introduction of the Online Solutions Court however goes further than changing the means of delivery.

It would be a more flexible solution than the creation of specialised courts to the extent that litigation may increase in areas not initially foreseen and that cases most suitable for specialised courts tend to be repetitive and easy to deal with;

While the action for damages had been initially conceived to protect those having a subjective right to be enforced before national courts, a reasonable solution in the present situation could be that the party who had drawn a benefit from the implementing act contrary to EU law now would be required to carry the burden of undertaking the necessary steps of an action for damages against the Member State; this would appear more justified than to impose said burden on the party who possesses a right created through the concretisation of the content of a principle (para 79).

With the Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision in Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc., Canadian jurisprudence and values bring us closer to the EU on privacy issues than with the U.S.

Therefore, a constitutional right of access to the regular courts is likely to be no more than a bandaid solution rendered palatable only by reasons of government parsimony in the support of adequate administrative processes.

The collaborative family law process works when it is more important for you to solve problems and work privately towards fair solutions rather than arguing publicly in court.

It does not sound as if the spouses could have arrived at a mediated solution — but if they had, the wife might have got more money than the Court of Appeal has given her.

One difference between inter partes and solicitor / client disputes can be that the parties still want to maintain a professional relationship and a court assessment is likely to jeopardise that, whereas «[m] ediation provides litigants with a wider range of solutions than those that are available in litigation: for example... continuation of an existing professional or business relationship perhaps on new terms» (see Lord Justice Dyson in Halsey).

I don't know if a software solution (Deal Proof comes to mind, though there are competitor products) is enough to guarantee no mistakes, but the thought of a double check certainly would be better than being criticized in court.

The solution to the problem of patent trolls is as simple as it is difficult to implement; more rigorous examination of patent applications, clarification and limitations of claims during prosecution, and increased use by the courts themselves (rather than the parties in litigation) of expert witnesses who can inform the court of the state of the art, and what implied limitations of the original invention should be considered by the court.

Providing parents with tools to empower them to handle their own situations and issues is a far better long - term solution for the children than having to rely on return trips to court.

However, because the collaborative attorneys will not bring contested issues to court, their focus is on finding solutions rather than using the meetings as a tool of opposition research.

Perhaps more importantly, it could mean the difference between the couple ending up in court representing themselves because they believe they can not afford mediation rather than in mediation where will be focusing on how they can reach solutions together and improve their communication.

A skilled collaborative team can help you find a solution to a difficulty much faster and more creatively than court ever could.

For example, parents in mediation can work out custody solutions that change over time to respond to a child's needs, a more flexible approach than court - mandated shared custody, Aulis says.

It may be too late for this, but if your ex-boyfriend is willing to mediate this dispute with you, you might be able to come up with some kind of solution that is at least better than what you would get in court.

The client who can look back and see that his or her lawyer was truly committed to finding solutions is going to be much more satisfied than the one who spent long hours waiting in court, was forced to endure adversarial and contentious arguments and suffered through the months or even years of litigation while having little control over the process.

Rather than trying to use the court to evoke revenge on your errant spouse, it's in your best interests to try and come up with the most workable solution you can without the court's intervention.

Adversarial family courts are structured for all - or - nothing solutions — which are part of the problem for high - conflict families, rather than part of the solution.

We help families who are facing difficult transitions to manage emotions, communicate effectively, make educated decisions and reduce conflict while keeping the most important goals of both parties at the forefront of the settlement.The focus is on constructive problem solving rather than on adversarial bargaining and court imposed solutions.

However, rather than turning to the courts and other adversarial processes to find a neat and tidy solution to an otherwise complex and messy situation, our government has taken the approach of encouraging and supporting both sides to find a mutually agreed upon resolution themselves.

My mediation work is geared to helping parents develop parenting plans that focus on their family's needs, rather than have a court - imposed solution.

Anything would be better than The Family Court System, but I have a solution that I deem the civilized divorce and it would have never allowed me to lose my daughter like The Family Courts did.

But for couples seeking to find a lasting solution rather than attack each other in court, the team approach can be highly recommended.

Rather than fighting an acrimonious court battle, couples and their lawyers work together with such experts to seek the best solution for the family.