Sentences with phrase «solve legal problems which»

Not exact matches

«Were we to separate legal and sacramental marriage, it would solve all sorts of problems, not the least of which is the growing discomfort that many of us have that legal marriage is available only to some responsible adults who are in monogamous relationships.»

The church can solve this problem by a «render unto Caesar» approach by relinquishing the legal role that the state has lumbered it with, and gets back to the basics of celebrating who God puts together — which, as stated in the previous verse, was between a man and woman instinct-wise.

«The Jehovah's Witnesses,» Supreme Court Justice Harlan Stone once famously said, «ought to have an endowment in view of the aid which they give in solving the legal problems of civil liberties.»

«A new study by LawGeex pitted 20 experienced lawyers against the LawGeex AI, which was designed to solve legal problems.

And therefore devices such as the following are used by law societies: (1) methods to control an alleged over-supply of lawyers; (2) «alternative legal services,» which are charity, simplistic services, and without the benefit of the solicitor - client relationship (pro bono services being but a very small exception, and possibly targeted legal services); and, (3) the sponsoring of «apps,» (the application of electronic technology to legal services), the effect of which upon the problem is unknown and unanalyzed, and can not solve any such access to justice problem.

Evidently, leaving the balancing to national courts would not solve the problem of divergent judgments in individual cases, which would again adversely affect legal certainty and equal treatment.

Right now, they have nothing of that nature — no program the purpose of which is to solve the problem of unaffordable legal services.

Law society neglect of the problem, which is in law, its duty to solve, has created a large permanent class within society that can not obtain affordable legal services.

The probability of wrongful convictions is increased by increasing numbers of defendants in the courts without lawyers, which is due to: (a) very poor government funding of legal aid programs; and, (b) law societies» failure to attempt to solve the unaffordable legal services problem — the one aggravates the damage done by the other.

Even the job which law schools supposedly do well, which is to indoctrinate impressionable youth in arcane legal reasoning, can actually get in the way of running a law firm, because law schools teach students how to identify issues or problems, but not how to solve them.

New law which is lowering cost to solve legal problems.

Lawyers are never taught this second step, which is not part of the legal process, and so lawyers tend to believe that a group of lawyers, sitting in a conference room, can solve firm management problems without any additional input, learning, or testing.

Alternative business structures proposals (ABS proposals), the basis of which is to allow commercial investors to own law firms, have no capacity to solve the problem of unaffordable legal services («the problem»).

But if we take the opportunity to build a new law school, free from the institutional memory / constraints and bureaucracy / opposition from existing faculty, we might just have a law school which solves the existing problems in the legal community, and the ones yet to emerge.

That we are coming closer to the One True Structure, which, when we find it, will solve «the problem» of legal writing and of teaching legal writing?

In which case, the best answer may be that you don't need to be a lawyer to be a legal tech founder, but you do need to have first - hand experience of the problem you are trying to solve in the legal world.

But the problem is not a legal problem, nor one solved by a more intensive use of previously used solutions, which is what is recommended.

So: threaten law societies that if they don't get competent to solve the problem of unaffordable legal services, then we must petition government to abolish law societies which would be the best thing that could be done for the population, the justice system, and the legal profession itself.

(3) The unavailability of legal services to a large majority of the population at reasonable cost has been a serious problem for decades and is getting worse, which shows that law societies are not able to solve the problem.

Building on our present Legal Research & Writing program, which will remain, we shall introduce our students to a range of skills including: talking to their clients, making a business arrangement with them, offering case - specific counselling and advice, coaching clients on procedures and strategy, reviewing options and alternatives for problem - solving with them, supporting client self - help and self - care, talking to and negotiating with the other side (s), participating as advocates for clients in mediation and other settlement processes, and a variety of hearings processes.

(2) I believe that trying to find a just solution to a contentious matter is as if not more demanding than arguing for its resolution according to legal precedents (I always tell my students that they are mistaken if they believe that mooting is the pinnacle of intellectual achievement in law school — in fact it is learning how to negotiate, mediate and problem - solve)(3) Learning how to problem - solve (which includes relating to the people as well as the problem) is a good deal more practical and important for prospective lawyers than being able to find and apply legal precedent, any well - trained monkey can learn to do that and (4) I think we make the mistake all the time of imagining that knowledge and skills are somehow binary processes.

That goes to something we've talked about before on the podcast which is realize that lawyers tend to be myopic thinking about, «There is a legal problem and I have the solution to it,» rather than, «My client has a problem, one aspect of which is a legal problem that I was trained to solve in law school, but there's a bigger problem that I can help solve.»

Technology innovators want to solve legal problems once for an unlimited number of people, which will allow them to provide the service more cheaply than is possible with current methods.

This extensive litigation experience, combined with our knowledge of the industries in which our clients compete, and our commitment to excellence, give us the ability to help solve our client's clients» legal problems through the business litigation process.

While at Berkeley he began to come around to the view that family courts are often required to solve problems which fundamentally are not legal but social.

However, the building of this kind of process requires a knowledge about substantive legal problems and how people practically can solve them which would go beyond what a court in this country would normally hold themselves out as holding.

During the LWOW program the teams must identify a problem in legal education or practice and create a Project of Worth which includes a prototype and business plan for a legal start - up that solves a specific problem.

An adjunct professor at Vanderbilt Law School, Cat co-teaches legal project management with Larry Bridgesmith and teaches Legal Problem Solving, which applies human - centered design thinking to both the practice and business oflegal project management with Larry Bridgesmith and teaches Legal Problem Solving, which applies human - centered design thinking to both the practice and business ofLegal Problem Solving, which applies human - centered design thinking to both the practice and business of law.

Clients value Stephen's creativity and problem solving skills which he combines with his deep knowledge of law and excellent legal skills.

Among other considerations sought from UdM by the FLSC to meet the requirements of the national common law program (see Appendix A of the report), the university is adding two more classes to its program: Integration Workshop (problem - solving, research and oral and written legal communication skills) and Ethics and Professionalism, which requires students to demonstrate «an awareness and understanding of the ethical requirements for the practice of law in Canada.»

wouldn't tell the public that the problem is not the Law Society's problem, as in effect it does; (15) LSUC's website wouldn't state that lay benchers «represent the public interest,» which is impossible now that we are well beyond the 19th century; (16) CanLII's services would be upgraded in kind and volume to be a true support service, able to have a substantial impact upon the problem, and several other developed support services, all provided at cost, would together, provide a complete solution; (17) LSUC's management would not be part - time management by amateurs - amateurs because benchers don't have the expertise to solve the problem, nor are they trying to get it, nor are they joining with Canada's other law societies to solve this national problem; (18) the Federation of Law Societies of Canada would not describe the problem as being one of mere «gaps in access to legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorilegal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authoriLegal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorilegal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorities.

Both solutions will occur because the power of the news media and of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types of information, the cumulative effect of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations of the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable cost.

The independence of Canada's law societies from government intervention has meant that their performance shows that they can not solve the problem, which is, «the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.»

This same technology can create several other support services, which together, would solve «the unaffordable legal services problem»: the majority of population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.

● Clarify the vision, purpose, and mission for your law practice ● Define and develop your legal niche to match your greatest strengths and motivate you to be the best in that field ● Project a likeable personality and acquire traits that will attract potential clients, who will eagerly seek you out to solve their legal problems ● Network and market your practice to generate a stream of clients ● Efficiently manage a solo law practice or small firm with limited resources and optimum results ● Evaluate law practice technology and marketing companies to find those which add value to your business (within your budget) ● Create systems and procedures for all office operations and client relations ● Create a peer group or gain a mentor to encourage and guide you as you build your practice

Settlement Counsel take a «big picture», problem - solving approach to a dispute in which legal rights are important — but a client's other needs and interests are also given weight.

According to Associate Dean and Professor Mark McKenna, an expert on intellectual property law who is a driving force behind the Law School's Program of Study in Intellectual Property and Technology law, «This is a welcome, forward - looking course that is dedicated to readying our grads for the new reality of legal practice in the 21st century, a time in which more law firm and corporate employers are seeking to hire attorneys who are familiar with technology and are able to find creative, non-traditional, cost - effective ways of solving legal problems.»

We often hear clients want a focus on value, which translates to thinking like the clients, understanding their business, solving their legal problems and helping them manage costs — and doing so in a predictable fashion.

Is there a law society program to solve the A2J problem, as distinguished from the current «alternative legal services» (ALSs), the purpose of which is merely to help society learn to live with the problem?

They do nothing more than help the population learn to live with the problem, which tells everyone that never again will they have a lawyer of their own, in a fiduciary duty, whose duty it is to solve the client's legal problems affordably.

«We were looking for people who would think more like a GC would think, which is let me solve the business problem with a creative legal solution versus a standard white - shoe answer, which is there are three ways to do it and it doesn't look like you're going to be able to do what you're planning on doing,» he says.

«Her years of experience and service reflect the core values of ESR which include a commitment to serving needs and solving problems of clients, professional excellence, organizational integrity, respect for consumers, and an industry leading standard for legal compliance.»

Enables lawyers to focus on legal issues and on problem solving, which are their areas of expertise.

Collaborative Law — A binding, non-litigation approach to solving legal problems in which parties engage in a series of settlement meetings outside the courthouse.